The COMPASs Study: Community Preferences for Prostate cAncer Screening. Protocol for a quantitative preference study

scientific article published on 7 January 2012

The COMPASs Study: Community Preferences for Prostate cAncer Screening. Protocol for a quantitative preference study is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1136/BMJOPEN-2011-000587
P932PMC publication ID3253419
P698PubMed publication ID22226686
P5875ResearchGate publication ID221730596

P50authorMichael P. PignoneQ42908785
Graham J MannQ56420238
Michelle CunichQ58418062
P2093author name stringKirsten Howard
Glenn P Salkeld
Manish I Patel
P2860cites workMortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trialQ24601536
Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European studyQ29617485
Quality of life three years after diagnosis of localised prostate cancer: population based cohort studyQ37444820
Measuring Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening: What are the Implications for Moving Forward?Q37978398
Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health - How are Studies being Designed and Reported?: An Update on Current Practice in the Published Literature between 2005 and 2008.Q37978419
Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task ForceQ39739727
Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide.Q40071854
Evidence-based consumer choice: a case study in colorectal cancer screeningQ40540014
Things are Looking up Since We Started Listening to Patients: Trends in the Application of Conjoint Analysis in Health 1982-2007.Q42722125
Does attribute framing in discrete choice experiments influence willingness to pay? Results from a discrete choice experiment in screening for colorectal cancerQ45835107
Measuring patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening using a choice-format surveyQ48383025
Analysing public preferences for cancer screening programmesQ48654616
A model of prostate-specific antigen screening outcomes for low- to high-risk men: information to support informed choices.Q51137092
Screening for prostate cancer. American College of PhysiciansQ73161582
Help Me in My Confusion: Should We Think More About Mammography and Colonoscopy as “Preference Sensitive Care’?Q82371942
P433issue1
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)e000587
P577publication date2012-01-07
P1433published inBMJ OpenQ17003470
P1476titleThe COMPASs Study: Community Preferences for Prostate cAncer Screening. Protocol for a quantitative preference study
P478volume2

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q37682102Comparing 3 techniques for eliciting patient values for decision making about prostate-specific antigen screening: a randomized controlled trial
Q36406693Informed decision making about prostate cancer testing in predominantly immigrant black men: a randomized controlled trial
Q55063465Men's preferences and trade-offs for prostate cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment.

Search more.