| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1111/J.1524-4733.2008.00417.X |
| P8608 | Fatcat ID | release_di6dt7ww4ffitnyv6alzpfh7cu |
| P698 | PubMed publication ID | 18657102 |
| P5875 | ResearchGate publication ID | 51430175 |
| P2093 | author name string | Kirsten Howard | |
| Glenn Salkeld | |||
| P433 | issue | 2 | |
| P921 | main subject | colorectal cancer | Q188874 |
| P304 | page(s) | 354-363 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2008-07-24 | |
| P1433 | published in | Value in Health | Q15766908 |
| P1476 | title | Does attribute framing in discrete choice experiments influence willingness to pay? Results from a discrete choice experiment in screening for colorectal cancer | |
| P478 | volume | 12 |
| Q38583668 | A Note on the Validity and Reliability of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Benefit-Risk Assessment of Medicines |
| Q38754295 | A discrete choice experiment to determine UK patient preference for attributes of disease modifying treatments in Multiple Sclerosis. |
| Q30365074 | Acceptance of vaccinations in pandemic outbreaks: a discrete choice experiment |
| Q49720616 | Application of Discrete-Choice Experiment Methods in Tobacco Control: A Systematic Review |
| Q34091305 | Applying discrete choice modelling in a priority setting: an investigation of public preferences for primary care models |
| Q38197949 | Assessing stated preferences for colorectal cancer screening: a critical systematic review of discrete choice experiments. |
| Q37682102 | Comparing 3 techniques for eliciting patient values for decision making about prostate-specific antigen screening: a randomized controlled trial |
| Q38227517 | Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature |
| Q92147059 | Disutility associated with cancer screening programs: A systematic review |
| Q59725121 | EFFICIENCY AND EQUITY: A STATED PREFERENCE APPROACH |
| Q42679374 | Eliciting willingness to pay in obstetrics: comparing a direct and an indirect valuation method for complex health outcomes |
| Q47799217 | How Does Health-Related Advertising with a Regulatory Focus and Goal Framing Affect Attitudes toward Ads and Healthy Behavior Intentions? |
| Q42203439 | How big does the effect of an intervention have to be? Application of two novel methods to determine the smallest worthwhile effect of a fall prevention programme: a study protocol |
| Q47551923 | How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity |
| Q35182729 | Learning and satisficing: an analysis of sequence effects in health valuation. |
| Q37978398 | Measuring Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening: What are the Implications for Moving Forward? |
| Q35867663 | Older adults' preferences for colorectal cancer-screening test attributes and test choice |
| Q39156536 | One size does not fit all: investigating doctors' stated preference heterogeneity for job incentives to inform policy in Thailand |
| Q57574296 | Patient Preferences for Treatment of Achilles Tendon Pain |
| Q33747360 | Preferences for colorectal cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment. |
| Q34199406 | Prioritising health service innovation investments using public preferences: a discrete choice experiment |
| Q39781561 | Public and decision maker stated preferences for pharmaceutical subsidy decisions: a pilot study |
| Q30577041 | Public stated preferences and predicted uptake for genome-based colorectal cancer screening. |
| Q38190876 | Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature. |
| Q27692660 | Stated Preference for Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 1990-2013 |
| Q35659835 | The COMPASs Study: Community Preferences for Prostate cAncer Screening. Protocol for a quantitative preference study |
| Q50150061 | Understanding consumer preferences in the context of managed competition: evidence from a choice experiment in Colombia |
| Q38768040 | Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform the Benefit-Risk Assessment of Medicines: Are We Ready Yet? |
| Q87984747 | Using Discrete-Choice Experiment Methods to Estimate the Value of Informal Care: The Case of Children with Intellectual Disability |
| Q34707908 | Using a discrete choice experiment to inform the design of programs to promote colon cancer screening for vulnerable populations in North Carolina |
| Q92269402 | What Does Society Value About Cancer Medicines? A Discrete Choice Experiment in the Belgian Population |
| Q91989982 | What attributes should be included in a discrete choice experiment related to health technologies? A systematic literature review |
Search more.