Improving understanding of adjuvant therapy options by using simpler risk graphics

scientific article published on December 2008

Improving understanding of adjuvant therapy options by using simpler risk graphics is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1002/CNCR.23959
P932PMC publication ID2716049
P698PubMed publication ID19012353
P5875ResearchGate publication ID23476639

P50authorAngela FagerlinQ87205900
Peter A. UbelQ98066077
Brian J Zikmund-FisherQ40392300
P2860cites workReducing aversion to side effects in preventive medical treatment decisionsQ57749448
Formats for Improving Risk Communication in Medical Tradeoff DecisionsQ57749507
Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferencesQ81374041
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisionsQ24250303
Graphical perception and graphical methods for analyzing scientific dataQ31125203
Computer program to assist in making decisions about adjuvant therapy for women with early breast cancerQ31960178
When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing?Q33929999
Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy ScaleQ34653859
Communicating side effect risks in a tamoxifen prophylaxis decision aid: the debiasing influence of pictographsQ37113445
Decreased use of adjuvant breast cancer therapy in a randomized controlled trial of a decision aid with individualized risk informationQ42659459
A decision aid to assist in adjuvant therapy choices for breast cancerQ42681645
Further insight into the perception of quantitative information: judgments of gist in treatment decisionsQ43993533
Judgments of change and proportion in graphical perceptionQ44948169
Risk communication with patients with breast cancer: cautionary notes about printing Adjuvant! estimates.Q45970567
Choice processing in emotionally difficult decisions.Q48764683
Alternate methods of framing information about medication side effects: incremental risk versus total risk of occurrence.Q51893433
Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations.Q51901185
Reducing the influence of anecdotal reasoning on people's health care decisions: is a picture worth a thousand statistics?Q51967791
P433issue12
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)3382-3390
P577publication date2008-12-01
P1433published inCancerQ326041
P1476titleImproving understanding of adjuvant therapy options by using simpler risk graphics
P478volume113

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q35112751'I'll do what they did": social norm information and cancer treatment decisions
Q36622299A demonstration of ''less can be more'' in risk graphics
Q38685531Acceptability of In Utero Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Sickle Cell Disease
Q36132098Animated graphics for comparing two risks: a cautionary tale
Q37689903Animated randomness, avatars, movement, and personalization in risk graphics
Q50583111Antenatal counselling for parents facing an extremely preterm birth: limitations of the medical evidence.
Q37710250Blocks, ovals, or people? Icon type affects risk perceptions and recall of pictographs
Q36739781Breast cancer patients' treatment expectations after exposure to the decision aid program adjuvant online: the influence of numeracy
Q35651125Breast cancer specialists' views on and use of risk prediction models in clinical practice: a mixed methods approach
Q35006280Calibration and discriminatory accuracy of prognosis calculation for breast cancer with the online Adjuvant! program: a hospital-based retrospective cohort study.
Q37389775Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine
Q38084624Communicating quantitative risks and benefits in promotional prescription drug labeling or print advertising
Q42573492Communicating risk to patients and the public
Q35567637Cool but counterproductive: interactive, Web-based risk communications can backfire
Q35142194Decision making and cancer.
Q34033150Development and preliminary user testing of the DCIDA (Dynamic computer interactive decision application) for 'nudging' patients towards high quality decisions
Q38076157Effectiveness of multimedia aids to enhance comprehension of research consent information: a systematic review.
Q40845421Effects of Numerical Versus Foreground-Only Icon Displays on Understanding of Risk Magnitudes
Q37255042Evaluation of risk communication in a mammography patient decision aid
Q41480729Graphics help patients distinguish between urgent and non-urgent deviations in laboratory test results
Q35557031Helping patients decide: ten steps to better risk communication
Q92184618How to communicate evidence to patients
Q37124483Improving communication of breast cancer recurrence risk
Q57810603Improving the Understanding of Test Results by Substituting (Not Adding) Goal Ranges: Web-Based Between-Subjects Experiment
Q64885192Informing, Reassuring, or Alarming? Balancing Patient Needs in the Development of a Postsurgical Symptom Reporting System in Cancer.
Q37919556Literature review: using pictographs in discharge instructions for older adults with low-literacy skills
Q39293103Measuring Graph Literacy without a Test: A Brief Subjective Assessment
Q28681293More Is Not Always Better: Intuitions About Effective Public Policy Can Lead to Unintended Consequences
Q33436043Oncologist use of the Adjuvant! model for risk communication: a pilot study examining patient knowledge of 10-year prognosis
Q39648121Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 for vaccination decisions.
Q36940952Pilot study of a physician-delivered education tool to increase patient knowledge about CKD.
Q30579901Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers
Q47842913Provider perspectives on presenting risk information and managing worry about recurrence among breast cancer survivors
Q50915746Risk Communication, Values Clarification, and Vaccination Decisions.
Q34361319Risky feelings: why a 6% risk of cancer does not always feel like 6%
Q30881534Stories of MDM: from a conversation to a career of making less data more useful
Q39312413Strengths and Gaps in Physicians' Risk Communication: A Scenario Study of the Influence of Numeracy on Cancer Screening Communication
Q37164673Tables or bar graphs? Presenting test results in electronic medical records
Q57391070The Influence of Graphic Display Format on the Interpretations of Quantitative Risk Information among Adults with Lower Education and Literacy
Q35824620The Many Facets of Genetic Literacy: Assessing the Scalability of Multiple Measures for Broad Use in Survey Research
Q36615205The benefits of discussing adjuvant therapies one at a time instead of all at once
Q51472808The defining characteristics of Web 2.0 and their potential influence in the online vaccination debate.
Q48015694The impact of doctor-patient communication on patients' perceptions of their risk of breast cancer recurrence
Q59195356The neural correlates of health risk perception in individuals with low and high numeracy
Q45731887The right tool is what they need, not what we have: a taxonomy of appropriate levels of precision in patient risk communication.
Q30544850The value of personalised risk information: a qualitative study of the perceptions of patients with prostate cancer
Q55249936Trial of infographics in Northern Ireland (TINI): Preliminary evaluation and results of a randomized controlled trial comparing infographics with text.
Q47689618Understanding the Harms and Benefits of Cancer Screening: A Model of Factors That Shape Informed Decision Making
Q37728416Use of a computerised decision aid (DA) to inform the decision process on adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer: development and preliminary evaluation
Q35856951Visual aids improve diagnostic inferences and metacognitive judgment calibration
Q31036088Visual presentations of efficacy data in direct-to-consumer prescription drug print and television advertisements: A randomized study
Q28247559Visualizing uncertainty about the future

Search more.