scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P50 | author | Angela Fagerlin | Q87205900 |
Peter A. Ubel | Q98066077 | ||
Brian J Zikmund-Fisher | Q40392300 | ||
P2860 | cites work | Reducing aversion to side effects in preventive medical treatment decisions | Q57749448 |
Formats for Improving Risk Communication in Medical Tradeoff Decisions | Q57749507 | ||
Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences | Q81374041 | ||
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions | Q24250303 | ||
Graphical perception and graphical methods for analyzing scientific data | Q31125203 | ||
Computer program to assist in making decisions about adjuvant therapy for women with early breast cancer | Q31960178 | ||
When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? | Q33929999 | ||
Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale | Q34653859 | ||
Communicating side effect risks in a tamoxifen prophylaxis decision aid: the debiasing influence of pictographs | Q37113445 | ||
Decreased use of adjuvant breast cancer therapy in a randomized controlled trial of a decision aid with individualized risk information | Q42659459 | ||
A decision aid to assist in adjuvant therapy choices for breast cancer | Q42681645 | ||
Further insight into the perception of quantitative information: judgments of gist in treatment decisions | Q43993533 | ||
Judgments of change and proportion in graphical perception | Q44948169 | ||
Risk communication with patients with breast cancer: cautionary notes about printing Adjuvant! estimates. | Q45970567 | ||
Choice processing in emotionally difficult decisions. | Q48764683 | ||
Alternate methods of framing information about medication side effects: incremental risk versus total risk of occurrence. | Q51893433 | ||
Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations. | Q51901185 | ||
Reducing the influence of anecdotal reasoning on people's health care decisions: is a picture worth a thousand statistics? | Q51967791 | ||
P433 | issue | 12 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P304 | page(s) | 3382-3390 | |
P577 | publication date | 2008-12-01 | |
P1433 | published in | Cancer | Q326041 |
P1476 | title | Improving understanding of adjuvant therapy options by using simpler risk graphics | |
P478 | volume | 113 |
Q35112751 | 'I'll do what they did": social norm information and cancer treatment decisions |
Q36622299 | A demonstration of ''less can be more'' in risk graphics |
Q38685531 | Acceptability of In Utero Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Sickle Cell Disease |
Q36132098 | Animated graphics for comparing two risks: a cautionary tale |
Q37689903 | Animated randomness, avatars, movement, and personalization in risk graphics |
Q50583111 | Antenatal counselling for parents facing an extremely preterm birth: limitations of the medical evidence. |
Q37710250 | Blocks, ovals, or people? Icon type affects risk perceptions and recall of pictographs |
Q36739781 | Breast cancer patients' treatment expectations after exposure to the decision aid program adjuvant online: the influence of numeracy |
Q35651125 | Breast cancer specialists' views on and use of risk prediction models in clinical practice: a mixed methods approach |
Q35006280 | Calibration and discriminatory accuracy of prognosis calculation for breast cancer with the online Adjuvant! program: a hospital-based retrospective cohort study. |
Q37389775 | Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine |
Q38084624 | Communicating quantitative risks and benefits in promotional prescription drug labeling or print advertising |
Q42573492 | Communicating risk to patients and the public |
Q35567637 | Cool but counterproductive: interactive, Web-based risk communications can backfire |
Q35142194 | Decision making and cancer. |
Q34033150 | Development and preliminary user testing of the DCIDA (Dynamic computer interactive decision application) for 'nudging' patients towards high quality decisions |
Q38076157 | Effectiveness of multimedia aids to enhance comprehension of research consent information: a systematic review. |
Q40845421 | Effects of Numerical Versus Foreground-Only Icon Displays on Understanding of Risk Magnitudes |
Q37255042 | Evaluation of risk communication in a mammography patient decision aid |
Q41480729 | Graphics help patients distinguish between urgent and non-urgent deviations in laboratory test results |
Q35557031 | Helping patients decide: ten steps to better risk communication |
Q92184618 | How to communicate evidence to patients |
Q37124483 | Improving communication of breast cancer recurrence risk |
Q57810603 | Improving the Understanding of Test Results by Substituting (Not Adding) Goal Ranges: Web-Based Between-Subjects Experiment |
Q64885192 | Informing, Reassuring, or Alarming? Balancing Patient Needs in the Development of a Postsurgical Symptom Reporting System in Cancer. |
Q37919556 | Literature review: using pictographs in discharge instructions for older adults with low-literacy skills |
Q39293103 | Measuring Graph Literacy without a Test: A Brief Subjective Assessment |
Q28681293 | More Is Not Always Better: Intuitions About Effective Public Policy Can Lead to Unintended Consequences |
Q33436043 | Oncologist use of the Adjuvant! model for risk communication: a pilot study examining patient knowledge of 10-year prognosis |
Q39648121 | Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 for vaccination decisions. |
Q36940952 | Pilot study of a physician-delivered education tool to increase patient knowledge about CKD. |
Q30579901 | Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers |
Q47842913 | Provider perspectives on presenting risk information and managing worry about recurrence among breast cancer survivors |
Q50915746 | Risk Communication, Values Clarification, and Vaccination Decisions. |
Q34361319 | Risky feelings: why a 6% risk of cancer does not always feel like 6% |
Q30881534 | Stories of MDM: from a conversation to a career of making less data more useful |
Q39312413 | Strengths and Gaps in Physicians' Risk Communication: A Scenario Study of the Influence of Numeracy on Cancer Screening Communication |
Q37164673 | Tables or bar graphs? Presenting test results in electronic medical records |
Q57391070 | The Influence of Graphic Display Format on the Interpretations of Quantitative Risk Information among Adults with Lower Education and Literacy |
Q35824620 | The Many Facets of Genetic Literacy: Assessing the Scalability of Multiple Measures for Broad Use in Survey Research |
Q36615205 | The benefits of discussing adjuvant therapies one at a time instead of all at once |
Q51472808 | The defining characteristics of Web 2.0 and their potential influence in the online vaccination debate. |
Q48015694 | The impact of doctor-patient communication on patients' perceptions of their risk of breast cancer recurrence |
Q59195356 | The neural correlates of health risk perception in individuals with low and high numeracy |
Q45731887 | The right tool is what they need, not what we have: a taxonomy of appropriate levels of precision in patient risk communication. |
Q30544850 | The value of personalised risk information: a qualitative study of the perceptions of patients with prostate cancer |
Q55249936 | Trial of infographics in Northern Ireland (TINI): Preliminary evaluation and results of a randomized controlled trial comparing infographics with text. |
Q47689618 | Understanding the Harms and Benefits of Cancer Screening: A Model of Factors That Shape Informed Decision Making |
Q37728416 | Use of a computerised decision aid (DA) to inform the decision process on adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer: development and preliminary evaluation |
Q35856951 | Visual aids improve diagnostic inferences and metacognitive judgment calibration |
Q31036088 | Visual presentations of efficacy data in direct-to-consumer prescription drug print and television advertisements: A randomized study |
Q28247559 | Visualizing uncertainty about the future |
Search more.