| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P50 | author | Brian J Zikmund-Fisher | Q40392300 |
| Angela Fagerlin | Q87205900 | ||
| Peter A. Ubel | Q98066077 | ||
| P2860 | cites work | Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions | Q24250303 |
| Computer program to assist in making decisions about adjuvant therapy for women with early breast cancer | Q31960178 | ||
| When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? | Q33929999 | ||
| Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale | Q34653859 | ||
| Patients' preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: is treatment worthwhile? | Q36622427 | ||
| Improving understanding of adjuvant therapy options by using simpler risk graphics | Q37276006 | ||
| Decreased use of adjuvant breast cancer therapy in a randomized controlled trial of a decision aid with individualized risk information | Q42659459 | ||
| A decision aid to assist in adjuvant therapy choices for breast cancer | Q42681645 | ||
| Further insight into the perception of quantitative information: judgments of gist in treatment decisions | Q43993533 | ||
| Risk communication with patients with breast cancer: cautionary notes about printing Adjuvant! estimates. | Q45970567 | ||
| Patients' preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: what makes AC and CMF worthwhile now? | Q46673536 | ||
| Choice processing in emotionally difficult decisions. | Q48764683 | ||
| Alternate methods of framing information about medication side effects: incremental risk versus total risk of occurrence. | Q51893433 | ||
| Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations. | Q51901185 | ||
| Reducing the influence of anecdotal reasoning on people's health care decisions: is a picture worth a thousand statistics? | Q51967791 | ||
| Reducing aversion to side effects in preventive medical treatment decisions | Q57749448 | ||
| Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers | Q80092332 | ||
| Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences | Q81374041 | ||
| P433 | issue | 6 | |
| P304 | page(s) | 661-671 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2010-04-07 | |
| P1433 | published in | Medical Decision Making | Q6806321 |
| P1476 | title | A demonstration of ''less can be more'' in risk graphics | |
| P478 | volume | 30 |
| Q36132098 | Animated graphics for comparing two risks: a cautionary tale |
| Q37710250 | Blocks, ovals, or people? Icon type affects risk perceptions and recall of pictographs |
| Q47656530 | Combining risk communication strategies to simultaneously convey the risks of four diseases associated with physical inactivity to socio-demographically diverse populations |
| Q38084624 | Communicating quantitative risks and benefits in promotional prescription drug labeling or print advertising |
| Q35567637 | Cool but counterproductive: interactive, Web-based risk communications can backfire |
| Q38963948 | Designing Visual Aids That Promote Risk Literacy: A Systematic Review of Health Research and Evidence-Based Design Heuristics |
| Q30533697 | Development of a decision aid to inform patients' and families' renal replacement therapy selection decisions. |
| Q47435017 | Does Iconicity in Pictographs Matter? The Influence of Iconicity and Numeracy on Information Processing, Decision Making, and Liking in an Eye-Tracking Study |
| Q36835895 | Does value mean quality? The payer's perspective |
| Q41480729 | Graphics help patients distinguish between urgent and non-urgent deviations in laboratory test results |
| Q35557031 | Helping patients decide: ten steps to better risk communication |
| Q48631800 | High Numerates Count Icons and Low Numerates Process Large Areas in Pictographs: Results of an Eye-Tracking Study. |
| Q37367201 | How could disclosing incidental information from whole-genome sequencing affect patient behavior? |
| Q37333408 | How do people interpret information about colorectal cancer screening: observations from a think-aloud study |
| Q92184618 | How to communicate evidence to patients |
| Q33637558 | Impact of delivery models on understanding genomic risk for type 2 diabetes |
| Q37124483 | Improving communication of breast cancer recurrence risk |
| Q57810603 | Improving the Understanding of Test Results by Substituting (Not Adding) Goal Ranges: Web-Based Between-Subjects Experiment |
| Q64885192 | Informing, Reassuring, or Alarming? Balancing Patient Needs in the Development of a Postsurgical Symptom Reporting System in Cancer. |
| Q64122622 | Keeping the patient in the center: Common challenges in the practice of shared decision making |
| Q37703391 | Negotiating Tensions Between Theory and Design in the Development of Mailings for People Recovering From Acute Coronary Syndrome |
| Q35792716 | Patient educational technologies and their use by patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer |
| Q57176113 | Patient-rated importance of key information on screening colonoscopy in Germany: a survey of statutory health insurance members |
| Q37567500 | Persuasive Interventions for Controversial Cancer Screening Recommendations: Testing a Novel Approach to Help Patients Make Evidence-Based Decisions. |
| Q30579901 | Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers |
| Q53629445 | Providing Quantitative Information and a Nudge to Undergo Stool Testing in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Decision Aid: A Randomized Clinical Trial. |
| Q59209325 | Racial and Ethnic Differences in Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests Awareness in HINTS 2007: Sociodemographic and Numeracy Correlates |
| Q38642738 | Reducing the socioeconomic gradient in uptake of the NHS bowel cancer screening Programme using a simplified supplementary information leaflet: a cluster-randomised trial |
| Q50915746 | Risk Communication, Values Clarification, and Vaccination Decisions. |
| Q35567616 | Risk estimates from an online risk calculator are more believable and recalled better when expressed as integers |
| Q30881534 | Stories of MDM: from a conversation to a career of making less data more useful |
| Q36615205 | The benefits of discussing adjuvant therapies one at a time instead of all at once |
| Q37394209 | The development and testing of a brief ('gist-based') supplementary colorectal cancer screening information leaflet |
| Q45731887 | The right tool is what they need, not what we have: a taxonomy of appropriate levels of precision in patient risk communication. |
| Q37057629 | Time trade-off: one methodology, different methods |
| Q48567559 | Visual aid tool to improve decision making in acute stroke care. |
| Q35856951 | Visual aids improve diagnostic inferences and metacognitive judgment calibration |
Search more.