| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P50 | author | Jane Wardle | Q15995569 |
| Samuel G Smith | Q50288316 | ||
| Christian von Wagner | Q56611928 | ||
| Michael S. Wolf | Q107640647 | ||
| Austin Obichere | Q125246105 | ||
| P2093 | author name string | Rosalind Raine | |
| P2860 | cites work | A theory of medical decision making and health: fuzzy trace theory | Q24651866 |
| Evidence that disgust evolved to protect from risk of disease | Q24683686 | ||
| The test of functional health literacy in adults: a new instrument for measuring patients' literacy skills | Q28274387 | ||
| More Is Not Always Better: Intuitions About Effective Public Policy Can Lead to Unintended Consequences | Q28681293 | ||
| Supporting informed consumer health care decisions: data presentation approaches that facilitate the use of information in choice | Q30746343 | ||
| Can user testing of a clinical trial patient information sheet make it fit-for-purpose?--a randomized controlled trial | Q33967348 | ||
| Literacy and learning in health care | Q34040333 | ||
| Effect of various risk/benefit trade-offs on parents' understanding of a pediatric research study | Q34159633 | ||
| A decision aid to support informed choices about bowel cancer screening among adults with low education: randomised controlled trial | Q34246235 | ||
| Presenting research risks and benefits to parents: does format matter? | Q35800763 | ||
| Risk perception and communication in vaccination decisions: a fuzzy-trace theory approach | Q35899214 | ||
| Literacy, cognitive function, and health: results of the LitCog study | Q36243480 | ||
| Does labeling prenatal screening test results as negative or positive affect a woman's responses? | Q36372717 | ||
| Effective recruitment and retention of minority research participants | Q36419466 | ||
| Communication about colorectal cancer screening in Britain: public preferences for an expert recommendation. | Q36451775 | ||
| A demonstration of ''less can be more'' in risk graphics | Q36622299 | ||
| Functional health literacy and health-promoting behaviour in a national sample of British adults | Q36768968 | ||
| Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review | Q37002937 | ||
| Health literacy and health actions: a review and a framework from health psychology | Q37252585 | ||
| Information needs and preferences of low and high literacy consumers for decisions about colorectal cancer screening: utilizing a linguistic model | Q37332297 | ||
| Responses to procedural information about colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood testing: the role of consideration of future consequences | Q37332798 | ||
| A framework for the evaluation of patient information leaflets | Q37332842 | ||
| How do people interpret information about colorectal cancer screening: observations from a think-aloud study | Q37333408 | ||
| Performance-based readability testing of participant information for a Phase 3 IVF trial | Q37346127 | ||
| The design of patient decision support interventions: addressing the theory-practice gap. | Q37779120 | ||
| Psychosocial determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening participation: a conceptual framework. | Q37876585 | ||
| Comparative analysis of print and multimedia health materials: a review of the literature | Q38024479 | ||
| A pilot study of StopAdvisor: a theory-based interactive internet-based smoking cessation intervention aimed across the social spectrum | Q39586274 | ||
| Perceived risk of tamoxifen side effects: a study of the use of absolute frequencies or frequency bands, with or without verbal descriptors | Q43246705 | ||
| Inequalities in participation in an organized national colorectal cancer screening programme: results from the first 2.6 million invitations in England | Q44259056 | ||
| Colorectal cancer screening knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs among veterans: does literacy make a difference? | Q45333497 | ||
| The right tool is what they need, not what we have: a taxonomy of appropriate levels of precision in patient risk communication. | Q45731887 | ||
| Bringing meaning to numbers: the impact of evaluative categories on decisions | Q45844439 | ||
| Statistical numeracy for health: a cross-cultural comparison with probabilistic national samples | Q47403578 | ||
| Patient information leaflets for medicines: using consumer testing to determine the most effective design | Q47625277 | ||
| Colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of 35 initiatives in 17 countries. | Q48687462 | ||
| Literacy, cognitive ability, and the retention of health-related information about colorectal cancer screening. | Q51036078 | ||
| Health literacy and self-efficacy for participating in colorectal cancer screening: The role of information processing. | Q51870290 | ||
| "User-testing" as a method for testing the fitness-for-purpose of written medicine information. | Q52845786 | ||
| European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Communication. | Q53122887 | ||
| Informed consent on trial | Q56775366 | ||
| Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers | Q80092332 | ||
| Physician decision making and cardiac risk: effects of knowledge, risk perception, risk tolerance, and fuzzy processing | Q80215117 | ||
| What affects the uptake of screening for bowel cancer using a faecal occult blood test (FOBt): a qualitative study | Q80931525 | ||
| Science and society: the communications revolution and cancer control | Q81287908 | ||
| Nottingham trial of faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer: a 20-year follow-up | Q82336764 | ||
| P433 | issue | 3 | |
| P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
| P921 | main subject | colorectal cancer | Q188874 |
| colorectal cancer screening | Q19391980 | ||
| colorectal carcinoma | Q25493920 | ||
| P304 | page(s) | 619-625 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2013-08-20 | |
| P1433 | published in | Patient Education and Counseling | Q15760736 |
| P1476 | title | The development and testing of a brief ('gist-based') supplementary colorectal cancer screening information leaflet | |
| P478 | volume | 93 |
| Q37704261 | Acceptability of the Cytosponge procedure for detecting Barrett's oesophagus: a qualitative study |
| Q40812957 | Comparative investigation of the effectiveness of face-to-face verbal training and educational pamphlets on readiness of patients before undergoing non-emergency surgeries |
| Q36601572 | Effects of evidence-based strategies to reduce the socioeconomic gradient of uptake in the English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (ASCEND): four cluster-randomised controlled trials |
| Q39057737 | Ethical issues with colorectal cancer screening-a systematic review |
| Q37333408 | How do people interpret information about colorectal cancer screening: observations from a think-aloud study |
| Q42736479 | Readability Analysis of the Package Leaflets for Biological Medicines Available on the Internet Between 2007 and 2013: An Analytical Longitudinal Study |
| Q88106521 | Readability assessment of package inserts of biological medicinal products from the European medicines agency website |
| Q61813912 | Readability assessment of package leaflets of biosimilars |
| Q38642738 | Reducing the socioeconomic gradient in uptake of the NHS bowel cancer screening Programme using a simplified supplementary information leaflet: a cluster-randomised trial |
| Q35159924 | The effect of a supplementary ('Gist-based') information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial |
| Q30831704 | Using Specialist Screening Practitioners (SSPs) to increase uptake of the Bowel Scope (Flexible Sigmoidoscopy) Screening Programme: a study protocol for a feasibility single-stage phase II trial |
Search more.