The impact of fair colonoscopy preparation on colonoscopy use and adenoma miss rates in patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy

scientific article published on 30 April 2013

The impact of fair colonoscopy preparation on colonoscopy use and adenoma miss rates in patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/J.GIE.2013.03.1334
P932PMC publication ID3840536
P698PubMed publication ID23642491

P2093author name stringH Myra Kim
Philip S Schoenfeld
Stacy B Menees
Eric E Elliott
Brittany B Graustein
Jennifer L Mickevicius
P2860cites workAmerican College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected]Q28236229
Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic reviewQ33232976
Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidenceQ34173853
Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2004, featuring cancer in American Indians and Alaska NativesQ34701416
Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study WorkgroupQ34728738
Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.Q34730621
The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopyQ35019533
Risks, costs, and compliance limit colorectal adenoma surveillance: lessons from a randomised trial.Q35364197
High compliance rates observed for follow up colonoscopy post polypectomy are achievable outside of clinical trials: efficacy of polypectomy is not reduced by low compliance for follow up.Q35756342
Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deathsQ35878265
Why don't gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines?: results of a national surveyQ37526072
Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopyQ37989691
Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal CancerQ38023997
Cap-fitted colonoscopy: a randomized, tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss ratesQ44047588
Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasiaQ47787731
Colon Polyp Recurrence in a Managed Care PopulationQ60622491
How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacityQ64132816
Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopyQ74503024
Should the quality of preparation impact postcolonoscopy follow-up recommendations?Q80087066
Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomyQ80458384
Dealing with uncertainty: surveillance colonoscopy after polypectomyQ80765823
The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists' recommendations for follow-up colonoscopyQ80832466
Surveillance patterns and polyp recurrence following diagnosis and excision of colorectal polyps in a medicare populationQ81448322
Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter studyQ81504576
Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer SocietyQ83885954
P433issue3
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectcolonoscopyQ840387
P304page(s)510-516
P577publication date2013-04-30
P1433published inGastrointestinal EndoscopyQ15724481
P1476titleThe impact of fair colonoscopy preparation on colonoscopy use and adenoma miss rates in patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy
P478volume78

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q39624960A novel quality scoring system for the evaluation of individual colonoscopy: A multicenter retrospective study
Q39181806A patient-blinded randomized, controlled trial comparing air insufflation, water immersion, and water exchange during minimally sedated colonoscopy
Q47627048ADENOMA DETECTION RATE EVALUATION AND QUALITY OF COLONOSCOPY IN THE CENTER-WEST REGION OF BRAZIL.
Q90599605Adherence to CRC Screening and Surveillance Guidelines when Using Split-Dose Bowel Preparation
Q38778051Biomarker discovery by proteomics-based approaches for early detection and personalized medicine in colorectal cancer
Q28079648Colonoscopy in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Current Aspects
Q35565679Colonoscopy: quality indicators
Q39645380Constipation, fiber intake and non-compliance contribute to inadequate colonoscopy bowel preparation: a prospective cohort study
Q87934094Efficacy and tolerability of 2-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate: a randomized controlled trial
Q38951330Factors Associated With Shorter Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals for Patients With Low-Risk Colorectal Adenomas and Effects on Outcome
Q36163751How Efficacious Are Patient Education Interventions to Improve Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy? A Systematic Review
Q57818980Hydrogen Breath Testing Predicts Bowel Preparation Quality Prior to Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review
Q38425431Impact of Bowel Preparation Quality on Adenoma Identification During Colonoscopy and Optimal Timing of Surveillance.
Q34053787Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating
Q27314703Improved Bowel Preparation with Multimedia Education in a Predominantly African-American Population: A Randomized Study
Q38686715Improving Endoscopic Adherence to Quality Metrics in Colonoscopy
Q64913882Is It Necessary to Intubate the Cecum to Examine the Whole Colorectum During Endoscopic Polypectomy?
Q36039425Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Bowel Preparation on Adenoma Detection: Early Adenomas Affected Stronger than Advanced Adenomas.
Q43448998Nationwide variability of colonoscopy preparation instructions
Q53198625Optimizing Colonoscopy Quality: From Bowel Preparation to Surveillance.
Q33936044Patient compliance and suboptimal bowel preparation with split-dose bowel regimen in average-risk screening colonoscopy
Q38174224Present and future perspectives of virtual chromoendoscopy with i-scan and optical enhancement technology
Q38570347Quality in Colonoscopy
Q91939922Quality optimisation in colonoscopy: a function of time of colonoscopy or bowel preparation
Q53581843Suboptimal Bowel Preparation Significantly Impairs Colonoscopic Detection of Non-polypoid Colorectal Neoplasms.
Q36719195Use of automated irrigation pumps improves quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy
Q35580936What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate

Search more.