Impact of Bowel Preparation Quality on Adenoma Identification During Colonoscopy and Optimal Timing of Surveillance.

scientific article published on 06 June 2015

Impact of Bowel Preparation Quality on Adenoma Identification During Colonoscopy and Optimal Timing of Surveillance. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1051926041
P356DOI10.1007/S10620-015-3737-2
P698PubMed publication ID26048021

P50authorSun Hyung KangQ82509777
Jaekyu SungQ82509785
Woosuk ChungQ83297334
P2093author name stringByung Seok Lee
Seok Hyun Kim
Eaum Seok Lee
Hee Seok Moon
Ju Seok Kim
Hyun Yong Jeong
P2860cites workScreening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of RadiologyQ28274937
Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer RoundtableQ31110735
Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic reviewQ33232976
Improving the quality of colorectal cancer screening: assessment of familial riskQ33854243
Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal CancerQ34136658
Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study WorkgroupQ34728738
What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rateQ35580936
The impact of fair colonoscopy preparation on colonoscopy use and adenoma miss rates in patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopyQ37342974
Meta-analysis: the relative efficacy of oral bowel preparations for colonoscopy 1985-2010.Q37960164
Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopyQ37989691
Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal CancerQ38023997
Socioeconomic and other predictors of colonoscopy preparation qualityQ39909070
Differences in proximal serrated polyp detection among endoscopists are associated with variability in withdrawal timeQ44178722
Rate and predictors of early/missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy in Manitoba: a population-based studyQ46315632
Prospective study of the frequency and size distribution of polyps missed by colonoscopyQ47439363
Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasiaQ47787731
Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3).Q47990052
Different bowel preparation schedule leads to different diagnostic yield of proximal and nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasm at screening colonoscopy in average-risk population.Q50995137
Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality.Q52961005
Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies.Q53036536
Colorectal Cancer in Patients Under Close Colonoscopic SurveillanceQ57780625
A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-SodaQ74253533
Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopyQ79556282
Should the quality of preparation impact postcolonoscopy follow-up recommendations?Q80087066
Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomyQ80458384
The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists' recommendations for follow-up colonoscopyQ80832466
Do we need to embrace adenoma detection rate as the main quality control parameter during colonoscopy?Q81235351
Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter studyQ81504576
Adenoma detection with cap-assisted colonoscopy versus regular colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trialQ83081056
Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancerQ84210147
P433issue10
P921main subjectcolonoscopyQ840387
P304page(s)3092-3099
P577publication date2015-06-06
P1433published inDigestive Diseases and SciencesQ15716711
P1476titleImpact of Bowel Preparation Quality on Adenoma Identification During Colonoscopy and Optimal Timing of Surveillance
P478volume60

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q41170446Correlation Between Bowel Preparation and the Adenoma Detection Rate in Screening Colonoscopy
Q64122865Impact of Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation Quality on Follow-up Interval Recommendations for Average-risk Patients With Normal Screening Colonoscopies: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
Q90665085Risk Factors Associated with Inadequate Bowel Preparation in Patients with Functional Constipation
Q88038861Same-Day Single Dose of 2 Liter Polyethylene Glycol is Not Inferior to The Standard Bowel Preparation Regimen in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Search more.