scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P50 | author | Jamie C Brehaut | Q94524286 |
Jacques Lee | Q96104425 | ||
Tim Rutledge | Q114318925 | ||
Robert J Brison | Q114339075 | ||
Mary A Eisenhauer | Q114717670 | ||
Howard Lesiuk | Q114717674 | ||
Brian R Holroyd | Q114717675 | ||
Jonathan Dreyer | Q114717676 | ||
Eric Letovsky | Q114717677 | ||
Jeremy Grimshaw | Q28359691 | ||
Jeffrey J. Perry | Q38544994 | ||
Ian G. Stiell | Q42774598 | ||
Michael J. Schull | Q45907310 | ||
Brian H. Rowe | Q58040260 | ||
George Wells | Q86652082 | ||
Douglas J McKnight | Q92002062 | ||
P2093 | author name string | Scott Ross | |
Amit Shah | |||
Catherine M Clement | |||
Urbain Ip | |||
Iain MacPhail | |||
P2860 | cites work | Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure | Q22121933 |
Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group | Q24524209 | ||
CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials | Q24604389 | ||
Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group | Q24645361 | ||
Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials | Q24801868 | ||
Users' guides to the medical literature: XXII: how to use articles about clinical decision rules. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group | Q28139383 | ||
Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules | Q28249983 | ||
Prospective validation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries | Q28275447 | ||
A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries | Q28293037 | ||
Translating clinical research into clinical practice: impact of using prediction rules to make decisions | Q28295968 | ||
Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies | Q29619183 | ||
Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement | Q29619967 | ||
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature | Q30040867 | ||
Methodologic standards for the development of clinical decision rules in emergency medicine. | Q33545090 | ||
Variation in emergency department use of cervical spine radiography for alert, stable trauma patients | Q34024052 | ||
The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients | Q34094795 | ||
Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. | Q34388662 | ||
Implementation of the Ottawa Knee Rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries | Q34449767 | ||
No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice | Q34710619 | ||
A matched-pair cluster design study protocol to evaluate implementation of the Canadian C-spine rule in hospital emergency departments: Phase III. | Q35647432 | ||
Analysis of data arising from a stratified design with the cluster as unit of randomization | Q36466008 | ||
Will a new clinical decision rule be widely used? The case of the Canadian C-spine rule | Q40343839 | ||
Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies | Q40468840 | ||
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2004 emergency department summary. | Q40474545 | ||
Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations | Q40618389 | ||
On design considerations and randomization-based inference for community intervention trials | Q41109510 | ||
Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards | Q41340678 | ||
Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group | Q41746854 | ||
Implementation of the Canadian C-spine rule reduces cervical spine x-ray rate for alert patients with potential neck injury | Q43698862 | ||
Understanding barriers to the adoption of clinical decision rules | Q47596243 | ||
Evaluating decision aids: the next painful step. | Q52468904 | ||
The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. | Q54215748 | ||
Will a New Clinical Decision Rule Be Widely Used? the Case of the Canadian C-Spine Rule | Q57260647 | ||
Derivation of a Decision Rule for the Use of Radiography in Acute Knee Injuries | Q57260704 | ||
Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation | Q70561420 | ||
The design and analysis of paired cluster randomized trials: an application of meta-analysis techniques | Q73725426 | ||
Health effects of ionising radiation from diagnostic CT | Q83860926 | ||
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P304 | page(s) | b4146 | |
P577 | publication date | 2009-10-29 | |
P1433 | published in | The BMJ | Q546003 |
P1476 | title | Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial | |
P478 | volume | 339 |
Q36445935 | A clinical decision rule for the use of plain radiography in children after acute wrist injury: development and external validation of the Amsterdam Pediatric Wrist Rules |
Q34176468 | A prospective cluster-randomized trial to implement the Canadian CT Head Rule in emergency departments |
Q30388599 | A report on the Academic Emergency Medicine 2015 consensus conference "Diagnostic imaging in the emergency department: a research agenda to optimize utilization". |
Q36183061 | A single center observational study on emergency department clinician non-adherence to clinical practice guidelines for treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections |
Q34980783 | Abdominal imaging utilization in the emergency department: trends over two decades |
Q34304850 | Accuracy of the Canadian C-spine rule and NEXUS to screen for clinically important cervical spine injury in patients following blunt trauma: a systematic review. |
Q58795794 | Adoption and use of guidelines for whiplash: an audit of insurer and health professional practice in New South Wales, Australia |
Q39333693 | Advancements in Imaging Technology: Do They (or Will They) Equate to Advancements in Our Knowledge of Recovery in Whiplash? |
Q35955758 | Back to the Bedside: Developing a Bedside Aid for Concussion and Brain Injury Decisions in the Emergency Department |
Q38388750 | CAEP 2014 Academic symposium: "How to make research succeed in your department: How to fund your research program". |
Q88042826 | CJEM Debate Series: #ChoosingWisely - The Choosing Wisely campaign will not impact physician behaviour and choices |
Q40076177 | CT overuse for mild traumatic brain injury |
Q104738125 | Can emergency department provider notes help to achieve more dynamic clinical decision support? |
Q38751606 | Choosing Wisely Canada®: Five tests, procedures and treatments to question in Emergency Medicine |
Q38633351 | Clinical Decision Rules for Diagnostic Imaging in the Emergency Department: A Research Agenda |
Q37676225 | Clinical characteristics associated with adverse events in patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective cohort study. |
Q30840754 | Designing Real-time Decision Support for Trauma Resuscitations |
Q38229545 | Developing an international register of clinical prediction rules for use in primary care: a descriptive analysis |
Q64228413 | Development of a clinical decision support tool for diagnostic imaging use in patients with low back pain: a study protocol |
Q36222496 | Diagnostic imaging for spinal disorders in the elderly: a narrative review |
Q37229731 | Effect of the Low Risk Ankle Rule on the frequency of radiography in children with ankle injuries. |
Q28068536 | Effectiveness of multifaceted implementation strategies for the implementation of back and neck pain guidelines in health care: a systematic review |
Q42718455 | Electronic decision support for diagnostic imaging in a primary care setting |
Q40005928 | Evaluation of acute cervical spine imaging based on ACR Appropriateness Criteria®. |
Q33810049 | Evaluation of the safety of C-spine clearance by paramedics: design and methodology |
Q48148325 | How to conduct implementation trials and multicentre studies in the emergency department. |
Q52544031 | How to diagnose cervicogenic dizziness. |
Q28069735 | Impact analysis studies of clinical prediction rules relevant to primary care: a systematic review |
Q55510407 | Implementing evidence-based practices in the care of infants with bronchiolitis in Australasian acute care settings: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled study. |
Q33938604 | Implementing evidence-based recommended practices for the management of patients with mild traumatic brain injuries in Australian emergency care departments: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial |
Q46155280 | Interobserver Agreement in Pediatric Cervical Spine Injury Assessment Between Prehospital and Emergency Department Providers |
Q38881882 | Key steps and common pitfalls in developing and validating risk models. |
Q38633478 | Knowledge Translation and Barriers to Imaging Optimization in the Emergency Department: A Research Agenda |
Q38803531 | Knowledge translation studies in paediatric emergency medicine: A systematic review of the literature. |
Q30495919 | Multicentre prospective validation of use of the Canadian C-Spine Rule by triage nurses in the emergency department |
Q36728590 | Pathological burst fracture in the cervical spine with negative red flags: a case report |
Q58594069 | Patient and paramedic engagement in prehospital emergency medicine research |
Q37224325 | Prediction of blunt traumatic injuries and hospital admission based on history and physical exam |
Q34365340 | Prehospital use of cervical collars in trauma patients: a critical review |
Q39099542 | Prospective and Explicit Clinical Validation of the Ottawa Heart Failure Risk Scale, With and Without Use of Quantitative NT-proBNP. |
Q50077241 | Review of implementation strategies to change healthcare provider behaviour in the emergency department |
Q57274255 | Systematic review of the effects of care provided with and without diagnostic clinical prediction rules |
Q90197939 | The Amsterdam Wrist Rules to reduce the need for radiography after a suspected distal radius fracture: an implementation study |
Q35872861 | The Amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma |
Q47420132 | The Misapplication of Severity-of-Illness Scores toward Clinical Decision Making |
Q38547220 | The quality movement or making radiology fun again |
Q34570355 | Theory of planned behaviour can help understand processes underlying the use of two emergency medicine diagnostic imaging rules. |
Q47351338 | Triage tools for detecting cervical spine injury in pediatric trauma patients. |
Q40321099 | Understanding Overuse of Computed Tomography for Minor Head Injury in the Emergency Department: A Triangulated Qualitative Study |
Q43237319 | Understanding the Canadian adult CT head rule trial: use of the theoretical domains framework for process evaluation. |
Q26853313 | Use of health information technology to reduce diagnostic errors |
Q48101254 | Variation in emergency department use of computed tomography for investigation of acute aortic dissection. |
Q41661600 | [Interface between preclinical and clinical trauma care: Analysis of the processes in a trauma network]. |
Search more.