human | Q5 |
P6178 | Dimensions author ID | 01227753706.77 |
P496 | ORCID iD | 0000-0002-4213-1143 |
P69 | educated at | McMaster University | Q632891 |
P108 | employer | University of Ottawa | Q627969 |
Stem Cell Network | Q7607283 | ||
P735 | given name | Jamie | Q1674029 |
Jamie | Q1674029 | ||
P106 | occupation | researcher | Q1650915 |
Q35725783 | A Scoping Review of Empirical Research Relating to Quality and Effectiveness of Research Ethics Review. |
Q97589878 | A concept analysis and meta-narrative review established a comprehensive theoretical definition of replication research to improve its use |
Q30530339 | A cross-country comparison of intensive care physicians' beliefs about their transfusion behaviour: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework |
Q104500232 | A patient-focused, theory-guided approach to survey design identified barriers to and drivers of clinical trial participation |
Q34176468 | A prospective cluster-randomized trial to implement the Canadian CT Head Rule in emergency departments |
Q33382884 | A survey of attitudes and factors associated with successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) knowledge transfer in an older population most likely to witness cardiac arrest: design and methodology |
Q33489070 | A survey of factors associated with the successful recognition of agonal breathing and cardiac arrest by 9-1-1 call takers: design and methodology |
Q91522701 | A systematic review of the association between coping strategies and quality of life among caregivers of children with chronic illness and/or disability |
Q27007611 | A systematic review of the use of theory in randomized controlled trials of audit and feedback |
Q30409925 | Acceptance of a pandemic influenza vaccine: a systematic review of surveys of the general public |
Q55442723 | Accommodating quality and service improvement research within existing ethical principles. |
Q42172429 | Advancing the literature on designing audit and feedback interventions: identifying theory-informed hypotheses |
Q56670508 | An Ethical Analysis of the SUPPORT Trial: Addressing Challenges Posed by a Pragmatic Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Controlled Trial |
Q53183823 | An international study of emergency physicians' practice for acute headache management and the need for a clinical decision rule. |
Q37375356 | An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist |
Q64276502 | Attributes of context relevant to healthcare professionals' use of research evidence in clinical practice: a multi-study analysis |
Q96606112 | Audit and feedback to improve laboratory test and transfusion ordering in critical care: a systematic review |
Q40108715 | Barriers and facilitators to CPR knowledge transfer in an older population most likely to witness cardiac arrest: a theory-informed interview approach. |
Q51210448 | Barriers and facilitators to CPR training and performing CPR in an older population most likely to witness cardiac arrest: a national survey. |
Q57519269 | Benefits and burdens of newborn screening: public understanding and decision-making |
Q42144876 | Building theories of knowledge translation interventions: use the entire menu of constructs |
Q36838989 | Can patient decision aids help people make good decisions about participating in clinical trials? A study protocol |
Q24794505 | Caregiving process and caregiver burden: conceptual models to guide research and practice |
Q38094062 | Challenges in the research ethics review of cluster randomized trials: international survey of investigators |
Q92597790 | Changes in Caregiver Health in the Years Surrounding the Birth of a Child With Health Problems: Administrative Data From British Columbia |
Q91234625 | Changes in the health of mothers of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities: An administrative data study |
Q53756402 | Changes over time in the health of caregivers of children with health problems: growth-curve findings from a 10-year Canadian population-based study. |
Q100422076 | Changing research culture towards more use of replication research: A narrative review of barriers and strategies |
Q42694065 | Childhood behavior disorders and injuries among children and youth: a population-based study. |
Q40041691 | Children with neurodevelopmental disorders and disabilities: a population-based study of healthcare service utilization using administrative data. |
Q40388616 | Clinical decision rules "in the real world": how a widely disseminated rule is used in everyday practice |
Q64094530 | Clinical performance comparators in audit and feedback: a review of theory and evidence |
Q79835015 | Clinical sensibility and barriers to knowledge translation |
Q94524288 | Cluster over individual randomization: are study design choices appropriately justified? Review of a random sample of trials |
Q36950786 | Cognitive and social issues in emergency medicine knowledge translation: a research agenda |
Q38267237 | Comparing alternative design options for chronic disease prevention interventions. |
Q40592944 | Complexity as a continuum of many health-related challenges |
Q35060054 | Computer-supported feedback message tailoring: theory-informed adaptation of clinical audit and feedback for learning and behavior change |
Q31138696 | Conceptualizing childhood health problems using survey data: a comparison of key indicators |
Q39682824 | Consent for newborn screening: parents' and health-care professionals' experiences of consent in practice |
Q24187609 | Decision aids for people considering taking part in clinical trials |
Q24201579 | Decision support interventions for people making decisions about participation in clinical trials |
Q45948718 | Developing a framework for replication of research in implementation science. |
Q58656996 | Developing a framework for the ethical design and conduct of pragmatic trials in healthcare: a mixed methods research protocol |
Q30895087 | Developing a non-categorical measure of child health using administrative data |
Q35855776 | Do physician outcome judgments and judgment biases contribute to inappropriate use of treatments? Study protocol |
Q48282337 | Does Consent Form Follow Function? |
Q35042345 | Does clinical equipoise apply to cluster randomized trials in health research? |
Q80187660 | Does cognitive status modify the relationship between education and mortality? Evidence from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging |
Q52640986 | Educating children and adolescents about vaccines: a review of current literature. |
Q91216241 | Effect of audit and feedback on physicians' intraoperative temperature management and patient outcomes: a three-arm cluster randomized-controlled trial comparing benchmarked and ranked feedback |
Q26800946 | Effectiveness and safety of short-stay units in the emergency department: a systematic review |
Q30977840 | Electronic search strategies to identify reports of cluster randomized trials in MEDLINE: low precision will improve with adherence to reporting standards |
Q38413226 | Elements of informed consent and decision quality were poorly correlated in informed consent documents |
Q45953135 | Emergency physicians' management of transient ischemic attack and desired sensitivity of a clinical decision rule for stroke in three countries. |
Q48148333 | Engaging emergency clinicians in emergency department clinical research. |
Q92944193 | Ethical Issues in Pragmatic Cluster-Randomized Trials in Dialysis Facilities |
Q102067779 | Ethical Issues in the Design and Conduct of Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trials in Hemodialysis Care: An Interview Study With Key Stakeholders |
Q37300594 | Ethical and policy issues in cluster randomized trials: rationale and design of a mixed methods research study |
Q50354508 | Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation |
Q35023625 | Ethical issues posed by cluster randomized trials in health research |
Q48275758 | Evaluating the potential for pharmacists to prescribe oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation. |
Q39689307 | Experiential and rational decision making: a survey to determine how emergency physicians make clinical decisions |
Q92238630 | Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol |
Q30251789 | Extent and Predictors of Decision Regret about Health Care Decisions: A Systematic Review |
Q40959371 | Facilitators and barriers to application of the Canadian C-spine rule by emergency department triage nurses |
Q47603546 | Factors associated with the successful recognition of abnormal breathing and cardiac arrest by ambulance communications officers: a qualitative iterative survey |
Q39123225 | Factors influencing the intentions of nurses and respiratory therapists to use automated external defibrillators during in-hospital cardiac arrest: a qualitative interview study. |
Q38756248 | Factors that influence effective perioperative temperature management by anesthesiologists: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework. |
Q90987452 | Family History Taking in Pediatric Practice: A Qualitative Interview Study |
Q24288733 | Following 411 Cochrane protocols to completion: a retrospective cohort study |
Q104802590 | Group practice impacts on patients, physicians and healthcare systems: a scoping review |
Q82854074 | Health among caregivers of children with health problems: findings from a Canadian population-based study |
Q48148325 | How to conduct implementation trials and multicentre studies in the emergency department. |
Q36096915 | Identifying the domains of context important to implementation science: a study protocol |
Q34087971 | Impact of stated barriers on proposed warfarin prescription for atrial fibrillation: a survey of Canadian physicians. |
Q37405932 | Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial |
Q37369981 | Improving outcomes for ill and injured children in emergency departments: protocol for a program in pediatric emergency medicine and knowledge translation science. |
Q34974428 | Inadequate reporting of research ethics review and informed consent in cluster randomised trials: review of random sample of published trials |
Q50222691 | Informed Consent Documents Used in Critical Care Trials Often Do Not Implement Recommendations |
Q53732917 | Informed consent documentation necessary but not sufficient. |
Q51374786 | Informed consent documents do not encourage good-quality decision making. |
Q111891815 | Informed consent in pragmatic trials: results from a survey of trials published 2014–2019 |
Q40034103 | International survey of emergency physicians' awareness and use of the Canadian Cervical-Spine Rule and the Canadian Computed Tomography Head Rule. |
Q40123817 | International survey of emergency physicians' priorities for clinical decision rules. |
Q35811280 | Mail merge can be used to create personalized questionnaires in complex surveys |
Q39602683 | Mapping out the emergency department disposition decision for high-acuity patients. |
Q39913396 | Measuring acceptability of clinical decision rules: validation of the Ottawa acceptability of decision rules instrument (OADRI) in four countries |
Q38996956 | National Survey of Emergency Physicians to Define Functional Decline in Elderly Patients with Minor Trauma. |
Q36751177 | National Survey of Geriatricians to Define Functional Decline in Elderly People with Minor Trauma |
Q44065178 | National survey of Canadian neurologists' current practice for transient ischemic attack and the need for a clinical decision rule |
Q36109799 | National survey of family physicians to define functional decline in elderly patients with minor trauma |
Q35107584 | National survey of physicians to determine the effect of unconditional incentives on response rates of physician postal surveys |
Q34917180 | Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study |
Q37607064 | Patient information leaflets (PILs) for UK randomised controlled trials: a feasibility study exploring whether they contain information to support decision making about trial participation |
Q51618764 | Perceived facilitators and barriers to clinical clearance of the cervical spine by emergency department nurses: A major step towards changing practice in the emergency department. |
Q39977953 | Practice Feedback Interventions: 15 Suggestions for Optimizing Effectiveness |
Q94457504 | Pragmatic Strategy Empowering Paramedics to Assess Low-Risk Trauma Patients With the Canadian C-Spine Rule and Selectively Transport Them Without Immobilization: Study Protocol for a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial |
Q35565118 | Presenting evidence to patients online: what do web users think of consumer summaries of cochrane musculoskeletal reviews? |
Q57260643 | Print format and sender recognition were related to survey completion rate |
Q40129102 | Psychosocial aspects of venous thromboembolic disease: an exploratory study |
Q50661730 | Psychosocial functioning in children with neurodevelopmental disorders and externalizing behavior problems. |
Q38711967 | Reporting and design elements of audit and feedback interventions: a secondary review |
Q33987339 | Reporting guidelines for survey research: an analysis of published guidance and reporting practices |
Q98783694 | Reporting of key methodological and ethical aspects of cluster trials in hemodialysis require improvement: a systematic review |
Q38068318 | Reporting of patient consent in healthcare cluster randomised trials is associated with the type of study interventions and publication characteristics |
Q36578480 | Researchers' perceptions of ethical challenges in cluster randomized trials: a qualitative analysis |
Q59336332 | Stakeholder views regarding ethical issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: study protocol |
Q44176868 | Survey of consent practices in cluster randomized trials: improvements are needed in ethical conduct and reporting |
Q57260602 | Survey of emergency physicians’ requirements for a clinical decision rule for acute respiratory illnesses in three countries |
Q56880323 | The Influence of Display and Statistical Factors on the Interpretation of Metaanalysis Results by Physicians |
Q34489528 | The Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized Trials |
Q90035161 | The authors reply |
Q92213020 | The ethical challenges raised in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: an interview study with key stakeholders |
Q51870623 | The health and psychosocial functioning of caregivers of children with neurodevelopmental disorders. |
Q51926727 | The health and psychosocial functioning of caregivers of children with neurodevelopmental disorders. |
Q43941045 | The health and well-being of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy |
Q40492289 | The health of primary caregivers of children with cerebral palsy: how does it compare with that of other Canadian caregivers? |
Q34570355 | Theory of planned behaviour can help understand processes underlying the use of two emergency medicine diagnostic imaging rules. |
Q58657128 | Thinking clearly about the FIRST trial: addressing ethical challenges in cluster randomised trials of policy interventions involving health providers |
Q59464582 | Thinking clearly about the FIRST trial: addressing ethical challenges in cluster randomised trials of policy interventions involving health providers |
Q106299666 | Top health research funders’ guidance on selecting journals for funded research |
Q50621475 | Understanding context in knowledge translation: a concept analysis study protocol. |
Q92270587 | Understanding context: A concept analysis |
Q43237319 | Understanding the Canadian adult CT head rule trial: use of the theoretical domains framework for process evaluation. |
Q44797992 | Use of medical services by methylphenidate-treated children in the general population |
Q99552225 | Using Canadian administrative health data to examine the health of caregivers of children with and without health problems: A demonstration of feasibility |
Q56779900 | Using decision aids may improve informed consent for research |
Q37422327 | Using theories of behaviour to understand transfusion prescribing in three clinical contexts in two countries: development work for an implementation trial |
Q51019738 | Validation of a decision regret scale. |
Q37585544 | Variability in research ethics review of cluster randomized trials: a scenario-based survey in three countries |
Q92434409 | What is in a Name? Parent, Professional and Policy-Maker Conceptions of Consent-Related Language in the Context of Newborn Screening |
Q36235833 | What is the role and authority of gatekeepers in cluster randomized trials in health research? |
Q35248319 | When is informed consent required in cluster randomized trials in health research? |
Q91605776 | When piloting health services interventions, what predicts real world behaviours? A systematic concept mapping review |
Q35184165 | Who is the research subject in cluster randomized trials in health research? |
Q57260647 | Will a New Clinical Decision Rule Be Widely Used? the Case of the Canadian C-Spine Rule |
Q40343839 | Will a new clinical decision rule be widely used? The case of the Canadian C-spine rule |