A proposed framework for assessing risk from less-than-lifetime exposures to carcinogens

scientific article published on 18 May 2011

A proposed framework for assessing risk from less-than-lifetime exposures to carcinogens is …
instance of (P31):
review articleQ7318358
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.3109/10408444.2011.552063
P698PubMed publication ID21591905
P5875ResearchGate publication ID51145984

P50authorR Julian PrestonQ122981015
P2093author name stringPeter M J Bos
Joel P Bercu
Serrine S Lau
Rory B Conolly
Alan R Boobis
Nancy G Doerrer
A Robert Schnatter
P Michael Bolger
Philip Carthew
Jay I Goodman
Rita Schoeny
Angelika Tritscher
Gary M Williams
Susan P Felter
David J Kirkland
Frans van Velsen
G Craig Llewellyn
Wafa A Harrouk
P2860cites workFinding the missing heritability of complex diseasesQ22122198
Oncogenes and CancerQ22248112
Temporal variation in the association between benzene and leukemia mortalityQ23911659
Adjustment for temporal confounders in a reanalysis of a case-control study of beryllium and lung cancerQ23917376
Lung cancer case control study of beryllium workersQ24169597
The age distribution of cancer and a multi-stage theory of carcinogenesisQ24564904
DNA mismatch repair: molecular mechanism, cancer, and ageingQ24647002
Smoking, smoking cessation, and lung cancer in the UK since 1950: combination of national statistics with two case-control studiesQ24653818
Mortality and cancer incidence following occupational radiation exposure: third analysis of the National Registry for Radiation WorkersQ24658544
Cancer and developmental exposure to endocrine disruptorsQ24814029
Assessing susceptibility from early-life exposure to carcinogensQ24815464
An evaluation of the implementation of the Cramer classification scheme in the Toxtree softwareQ52227990
Carcinogenic risk assessment with time-dependent exposure patterns.Q52547638
Using average lifetime dose rate for intermittent exposures to carcinogens.Q52589079
Physiologically based pharmacokinetics and the risk assessment process for methylene chloride.Q52604250
A new method for determining allowable daily intakes.Q52687390
Comparison of carcinogenic and in vivo genotoxic potency estimates.Q53361230
Regulatory cancer risk assessment based on a quick estimate of a benchmark dose derived from the maximum tolerated dose.Q53425954
Quick estimate of the regulatory virtually safe dose based on the maximum tolerated dose for rodent bioassays.Q53462468
Effect of varying exposure regimens on methylene chloride-induced lung and liver tumors in female B6C3F1 mice.Q53480452
Rodent carcinogens: setting prioritiesQ53486868
Evaluation of the newborn mouse model for chemical tumorigenesisQ53497195
Calculation of carcinogenic potency from long-term animal carcinogenesis experiments.Q53553612
The effect of age and exposure duration on cancer induction by a known carcinogen in rats, mice, and hamsters.Q53560044
Exposure to beryllium and occurrence of lung cancer: a reexamination of findings from a nested case-control study.Q53581050
IPCS framework for analyzing the relevance of a cancer mode of action for humans.Q53587174
Structural motifs modulating the carcinogenic risk of aromatic aminesQ56914927
Decrease in risk of lung cancer death in males after smoking cessation by age at quitting: findings from the JACC studyQ45222172
Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals I. Alternative toxicity measures as an estimator of carcinogenic potencyQ46111506
Supplement to the Carcinogenic Potency Database (CPDB): results of animal bioassays published in the general literature through 1997 and by the National Toxicology Program in 1997-1998.Q46827417
Evaluating the human relevance of chemically induced animal tumorsQ47250065
A tiered approach to threshold of regulationQ50125469
Neonatal mouse assay for tumorigenicity: alternative to the chronic rodent bioassayQ50926494
Uncertainty in cancer risk estimatesQ51052651
A framework for using structural, reactivity, metabolic and physicochemical similarity to evaluate the suitability of analogs for SAR-based toxicological assessments.Q51791622
Use of genotoxicity data to support clinical trials or positive genetox findings on a candidate pharmaceutical or impurity .... now what?Q51815216
Guidelines for application of chemical-specific adjustment factors in dose/concentration-response assessment.Q52025560
Mechanistic basis for nonlinearities and thresholds in rat liver carcinogenesis by the DNA-reactive carcinogens 2-acetylaminofluorene and diethylnitrosamine.Q52077247
Evaluation of child/adult pharmacokinetic differences from a database derived from the therapeutic drug literature.Q52122632
Haber's rule: a special case in a family of curves relating concentration and duration of exposure to a fixed level of response for a given endpointQ28144801
Cancer genes and the pathways they controlQ28275089
Hormonal carcinogenesis and socio-biological development factors in endometrial cancer: a clinical reviewQ28286389
Prevention of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: approaches to estimating and reducing riskQ28390064
Cancer epigenomics: DNA methylomes and histone-modification mapsQ29615524
Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998Q29620810
A carcinogenic potency database of the standardized results of animal bioassaysQ30498518
Prediction of cancer potency using a battery of mutation and toxicity dataQ30655184
Drug-like properties and the causes of poor solubility and poor permeabilityQ30660926
Overview: Using mode of action and life stage information to evaluate the human relevance of animal toxicity dataQ31029852
Reevaluation of benzene exposure for the Pliofilm (rubberworker) cohort (1936-1976).Q33227565
Ethyl methanesulfonate toxicity in Viracept--a comprehensive human risk assessment based on threshold data for genotoxicityQ33445819
A comprehensive approach for integration of toxicity and cancer risk assessmentsQ33537456
A procedure for the safety evaluation of flavouring substances. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food AdditivesQ33607826
Cessation of alcohol drinking, tobacco smoking and the reversal of head and neck cancer riskQ33632467
The Single Exposure Carcinogen Database: assessing the circumstances under which a single exposure to a carcinogen can cause cancerQ33729429
Application of key events analysis to chemical carcinogens and noncarcinogensQ33736229
What role for biologically based dose-response models in estimating low-dose risk?Q33837778
Carcinogenesis in mouse and human cells: parallels and paradoxesQ33846175
Dose and time as variables of toxicityQ33899185
Development of the murine and human immune system: differential effects of immunotoxicants depend on time of exposureQ33942473
Critical windows of exposure for children's health: cancer in human epidemiological studies and neoplasms in experimental animal modelsQ33942505
The use of Haber's law in standard setting and risk assessmentQ34017647
The role of time in toxicology or Haber's c x t productQ34017651
Cancer genetics.Q34253580
Neonatal mouse model: review of methods and resultsQ34429222
Altered DNA methylation: a secondary mechanism involved in carcinogenesisQ34504084
Association of long lasting unsurmountable histamine H2 blockade and gastric carcinoid tumours in the ratQ34528278
Alteration of liver cell function and proliferation: differentiation between adaptation and toxicityQ34560275
The causes and prevention of cancer: gaining perspectiveQ34638943
Extending the threshold of regulation concept: de minimis limits for carcinogens and mutagensQ34672935
Differential sensitivity of children and adults to chemical toxicity. I. Biological basisQ34803159
The carcinogenesis bioassay in perspective: application in identifying human cancer hazardsQ34864407
13th Meeting of the Scientific Group on Methodologies for the Safety Evaluation of Chemicals (SGOMSEC): alternative testing methodologies for organ toxicityQ34942041
Differences between children and adults: implications for risk assessment at California EPA.Q34978971
Supplement to the Carcinogenic Potency Database (CPDB): results of animal bioassays published in the general literature in 1993 to 1994 and by the National Toxicology Program in 1995 to 1996.Q35032604
The Carcinogenic Potency Database: analyses of 4000 chronic animal cancer experiments published in the general literature and by the U.S. National Cancer Institute/National Toxicology ProgramQ35034775
Are genotoxic carcinogens more potent than nongenotoxic carcinogens?Q35035161
Cancer induction following single and multiple exposures to a constant amount of vinyl chloride monomerQ35036244
Lymphohaematopoeitic cancer mortality among workers with benzene exposureQ35499572
Structure-based thresholds of toxicological concern (TTC): guidance for application to substances present at low levels in the dietQ35589744
Species comparison of anatomical and functional immune system developmentQ35604528
A framework for human relevance analysis of information on carcinogenic modes of actionQ35631055
Risk assessment of peak exposure to genotoxic carcinogens: a pragmatic approachQ35792379
Dose-dependent transitions in mechanisms of toxicity: case studiesQ35975278
Trichloroethylene: mechanisms of renal toxicity and renal cancer and relevance to risk assessmentQ36371845
Organ and cell specificity of base excision repair mutants in miceQ36502641
Formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde and nasal cytotoxicity: case study within the context of the 2006 IPCS Human Framework for the Analysis of a cancer mode of action for humansQ36659785
Nasal cytotoxic and carcinogenic activities of systemically distributed organic chemicalsQ36688003
The cumulative risk of lung cancer among current, ex- and never-smokers in European men.Q36695716
Genome instability and DNA damage accumulation in gene-targeted mice.Q36705572
Mechanistic data and risk assessment of selected toxic end points of the thyroid glandQ36849669
Targeted deletion of the genes encoding NTH1 and NEIL1 DNA N-glycosylases reveals the existence of novel carcinogenic oxidative damage to DNA.Q36972337
Promotion of hepatocarcinogenesis in humans and animal modelsQ37060367
The context and potential of epigenetics in oncologyQ37123413
Evaluation of potential human carcinogenicity of the synthetic monomer ethyl acrylateQ37302248
Generation, biological consequences and repair mechanisms of cytosine deamination in DNA.Q37318650
Predictive models for carcinogenicity and mutagenicity: frameworks, state-of-the-art, and perspectivesQ37468717
Calories and carcinogenesis: lessons learned from 30 years of calorie restriction researchQ37647283
Application of the margin of exposure (MoE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic: example: aflatoxin B1 (AFB1).Q37683875
Proposed mechanism of induction of gastric carcinoids: the gastrin hypothesisQ37830513
Estimation of toxic hazard—A decision tree approachQ39771165
In silico approaches to predicting cancer potency for risk assessment of genotoxic impurities in drug substancesQ39886219
Effects of hypochlorhydria and hypergastrinemia on structure and function of gastrointestinal cells. A review and analysisQ40595580
IPCS conceptual framework for evaluating a mode of action for chemical carcinogenesisQ40681312
DNA damage as assessed by 32P-postlabelling in three rat strains exposed to dietary tamoxifen: the relationship between cell proliferation and liver tumour formationQ42279753
Non-linearity of neoplastic conversion induced in rat liver by low exposures to diethylnitrosamineQ42284621
Carcinogens are mutagens: their detection and classificationQ42414754
The Viracept (nelfinavir)--ethyl methanesulfonate case: a threshold risk assessment for human exposure to a genotoxic drug contamination?Q43288862
Using the Biological Two-Stage Model to Assess Risk from Short-Term ExposuresQ44256571
Cancer risk assessment with intermittent exposureQ44663070
N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) increased brain mutations in prenatal and neonatal mice but not in the adults.Q44907968
Thresholds for the effects of 2-acetylaminofluorene in rat liverQ45123174
P433issue6
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectexposure assessmentQ4008388
P304page(s)507-544
P577publication date2011-05-18
P1433published inCritical Reviews in ToxicologyQ3562267
P1476titleA proposed framework for assessing risk from less-than-lifetime exposures to carcinogens
P478volume41

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q87244539A TTC threshold for acute oral exposure to non-genotoxic substances
Q47434915Active pharmaceutical ingredients detected in herbal food supplements for weight loss sampled on the Dutch market.
Q36566677Advancing the next generation of health risk assessment
Q46866657Advancing toxicology in RiskMAPP: setting ADEs based on the subsequent drug substance
Q47579313Application of the threshold of toxicological concern concept when applied to pharmaceutical manufacturing operations intended for short-term clinical trials
Q38686742County-level cumulative environmental quality associated with cancer incidence
Q50481348Critical elements for human health risk assessment of less than lifetime exposures
Q48360872Determination and risk assessment of naturally occurring genotoxic and carcinogenic alkenylbenzenes in nutmeg-based plant food supplements
Q53249632Establishing the level of safety concern for chemicals in food without the need for toxicity testing.
Q97073010Guidance on the use of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern approach in food safety assessment
Q38020789Liver hypertrophy: a review of adaptive (adverse and non-adverse) changes--conclusions from the 3rd International ESTP Expert Workshop
Q39662033Mechanistic study on lung cancer mortality after radon exposure in the Wismut cohort supports important role of clonal expansion in lung carcinogenesis
Q50168354Potential impurities in drug substances: Compound-specific toxicology limits for 20 synthetic reagents and by-products, and a class-specific toxicology limit for alkyl bromides
Q44173916Potentially mutagenic impurities: analysis of structural classes and carcinogenic potencies of chemical intermediates in pharmaceutical syntheses supports alternative methods to the default TTC for calculating safe levels of impurities
Q48329721Risk assessment of combined exposure to alkenylbenzenes through consumption of plant food supplements containing parsley and dill.
Q39149237Risk assessment of plant food supplements and other herbal products containing aristolochic acids using the margin of exposure (MOE) approach
Q28396943Risk-based indicators of Canadians' exposures to environmental carcinogens

Search more.