| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000978 |
| P698 | PubMed publication ID | 24642999 |
| P50 | author | Borislav D. Dimitrov | Q38323759 |
| Stephen Wheatcroft | Q43402450 | ||
| Adrian Banning | Q51540650 | ||
| P2093 | author name string | Colm Hanratty | |
| Omar Rana | |||
| Alison Calver | |||
| Nick Curzen | |||
| Azfar Zaman | |||
| David Hildick-Smith | |||
| Simon Corbett | |||
| Zoe Nicholas | |||
| Dan McKenzie | |||
| Keith Oldroyd | |||
| Alex Hobson | |||
| Kam Chitkara | |||
| Peter Golledge | |||
| P433 | issue | 2 | |
| P921 | main subject | angiography | Q468414 |
| pain management | Q621261 | ||
| coronary angiography | Q1482382 | ||
| P304 | page(s) | 248-255 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2014-03-18 | |
| P1433 | published in | Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions | Q60855009 |
| P1476 | title | Does routine pressure wire assessment influence management strategy at coronary angiography for diagnosis of chest pain?: the RIPCORD study | |
| P478 | volume | 7 |
| Q90041388 | A physiological approach to refine appropriateness of revascularization, clinical decision making and prognosis in patients with multi vessel coronary artery disease |
| Q54423031 | A vulnerable plaque identified on CT coronary angiography: when should we act in stable coronary artery disease? |
| Q58128773 | Angiographically insignificant yet ischemia-causing coronary lesions: a case for routine use of invasive physiologic testing during diagnostic cardiac catheterization |
| Q38371271 | Clinical Outcomes of Deferred Lesions With Angiographically Insignificant Stenosis But Low Fractional Flow Reserve. |
| Q40635193 | Clinical and prognostic value of poststenting fractional flow reserve in acute coronary syndromes |
| Q47820191 | Clinical implications of three-vessel fractional flow reserve measurement in patients with coronary artery disease. |
| Q90654642 | Comparison between minimum lumen cross-sectional area and intraluminal ultrasonic intensity analysis using integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound for prediction of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis |
| Q97645716 | Comparison of diagnostic performance between quantitative flow ratio, non-hyperemic pressure indices and fractional flow reserve |
| Q89565418 | Computed tomographic evaluation of myocardial ischemia |
| Q62492423 | Coronary CT angiography-derived plaque quantification with artificial intelligence CT fractional flow reserve for the identification of lesion-specific ischemia |
| Q26768468 | Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Derived Fractional Flow Reserve and Plaque Stress |
| Q38968127 | Coronary Physiology Assessment for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease |
| Q36795975 | Coronary plaque quantification and fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomography angiography identify ischaemia-causing lesions |
| Q35928390 | Diagnostic Performance of First-Pass Myocardial Perfusion Imaging without Stress with Computed Tomography (CT) Compared with Coronary CT Angiography Alone, with Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard |
| Q48092461 | Diagnostic accuracy of a hybrid approach of instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve using high-dose intracoronary adenosine to characterize intermediate coronary lesions: Results of the PALS (Practical Assessment of Lesion Severity |
| Q41984364 | Diagnostic one-stop-shop in suspected coronary artery disease gets closer. Coronary computed tomography angiography based fractional flow reserve |
| Q37738590 | Diagnostic performance of cardiac imaging methods to diagnose ischaemia-causing coronary artery disease when directly compared with fractional flow reserve as a reference standard: a meta-analysis |
| Q31149523 | Does the evidence really suggest that we should completely revascularise bystander disease in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty? Why we still need more definitive trial data to change routine practice. |
| Q50980751 | Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease Using Myocardial Elastography with Diverging Wave Imaging: Validation against Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and Coronary Angiography. |
| Q38843460 | FFR and iFR guided percutaneous coronary intervention |
| Q36200819 | Finding the Gatekeeper to the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: Coronary CT Angiography or Stress Testing? |
| Q89896311 | Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Safely Defers Invasive Coronary Angiography in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease |
| Q47603842 | Fractional Flow Reserve Estimated at Coronary CT Angiography in Intermediate Lesions: Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Different Methods to Determine Coronary Flow Distribution. |
| Q42950379 | Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Lesion or Patient Management? |
| Q36286090 | Fractional flow reserve (FFR) versus angiography in guiding management to optimise outcomes in non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (FAMOUS-NSTEMI) developmental trial: cost-effectiveness using a mixed trial- and model-based methods. |
| Q50089661 | Fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion by computed tomography: a guide to clinical application |
| Q39119257 | Fractional flow reserve and resting indices for coronary physiologic assessment: Practical guide, tips, and tricks |
| Q38635749 | Fractional flow reserve in acute coronary syndromes: A review |
| Q34921869 | Fractional flow reserve vs. angiography in guiding management to optimize outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation FAMOUS-NSTEMI randomized trial |
| Q36753941 | Fractional flow reserve-guided management in stable coronary disease and acute myocardial infarction: recent developments |
| Q33849439 | Fractional flow reserve: a clinical perspective. |
| Q51761432 | Functional Approach for Coronary Artery Disease: Filling the Gap Between Evidence and Practice. |
| Q89689452 | How Do PET Myocardial Blood Flow Reserve and FFR Differ? |
| Q88195648 | Is Hyperaemia Essential for Accurate Functional Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Severity? |
| Q90380328 | Latest Advances in Cardiac CT |
| Q97524590 | Management of multivessel coronary artery disease in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a complex path to precision medicine |
| Q26800897 | Modifying angiographic syntax score according to PCI strategy: lessons learnt from ERACI IV Study |
| Q47284281 | Myocardial ischemia testing with computed tomography: emerging strategies |
| Q27331418 | Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography for identification of ischemic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. |
| Q93163365 | ORBITA: What Goes Around, Comes Around… Or Does It? |
| Q38688829 | Quantitative Coronary Physiology for Clinical Management: the Imaging Standard |
| Q90582049 | Quantitative flow ratio and fractional flow reserve mismatch - clinical and biochemical predictors of measurement discrepancy |
| Q88355743 | Revascularization in stable coronary disease: evidence and uncertainties |
| Q36345768 | Safety of guidewire-based measurement of fractional flow reserve and the index of microvascular resistance using intravenous adenosine in patients with acute or recent myocardial infarction |
| Q89612607 | The Clinical Significance of Physiological Assessment of Residual Ischemia After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
| Q36363178 | The Impact of Fractional Flow Reserve on Revascularization |
| Q37177868 | The incremental impact of cardiac MRI on clinical decision-making. |
| Q89476398 | The influence of image quality on diagnostic performance of a machine learning-based fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography |
Search more.