| review article | Q7318358 |
| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P6179 | Dimensions Publication ID | 1028044200 |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1007/S12928-016-0404-2 |
| P698 | PubMed publication ID | 27221377 |
| P2093 | author name string | Yoshiaki Kawase | |
| Hitoshi Matsuo | |||
| P2860 | cites work | Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography | Q40585925 |
| Repeatability of Fractional Flow Reserve Despite Variations in Systemic and Coronary Hemodynamics | Q40702661 | ||
| Deferral vs. performance of percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant coronary stenosis: 15-year follow-up of the DEFER trial | Q41326900 | ||
| Hemodynamic response to intravenous adenosine and its effect on fractional flow reserve assessment: results of the Adenosine for the Functional Evaluation of Coronary Stenosis Severity (AFFECTS) study. | Q43817420 | ||
| Pressure-flow characteristics of coronary stenoses in unsedated dogs at rest and during coronary vasodilation | Q44051738 | ||
| Impact of myocardial supply area on the transstenotic hemodynamics as determined by fractional flow reserve | Q44380210 | ||
| Intracoronary and intravenous adenosine 5'-triphosphate, adenosine, papaverine, and contrast medium to assess fractional flow reserve in humans | Q44385683 | ||
| Variations of coronary hemodynamic responses to intravenous adenosine infusion: implications for fractional flow reserve measurements | Q44991041 | ||
| Outcome impact of coronary revascularization strategy reclassification with fractional flow reserve at time of diagnostic angiography: insights from a large French multicenter fractional flow reserve registry | Q45769229 | ||
| Modification of treatment strategy after FFR measurement: CVIT-DEFER registry | Q45804386 | ||
| Long-term outcome after deferral of revascularization in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis and gray-zone fractional flow reserve. | Q51033993 | ||
| Visual-functional mismatch between coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. | Q51308840 | ||
| Pressure-derived fractional flow reserve to assess serial epicardial stenoses: theoretical basis and animal validation. | Q52079755 | ||
| Validation of functional state of coronary tandem lesions using computational flow dynamics. | Q53363736 | ||
| Physiological basis and long-term clinical outcome of discordance between fractional flow reserve and coronary flow velocity reserve in coronary stenoses of intermediate severity. | Q53562941 | ||
| Usefulness and safety of intracoronary administration of nicorandil for evaluating fractional flow reserve in Japanese patients. | Q53627078 | ||
| Association between coronary lesion severity and distal microvascular resistance in patients with coronary artery disease. | Q53925590 | ||
| Compensatory changes of the distal coronary vascular bed during progressive coronary constriction | Q54167089 | ||
| Low coronary microcirculatory resistance associated with profound hypotension during intravenous adenosine infusion: implications for the functional assessment of coronary stenoses | Q57761236 | ||
| Potential and limitations of wave intensity analysis in coronary arteries | Q58472387 | ||
| Fractional flow reserve to guide coronary revascularization | Q27021374 | ||
| The Instantaneous wave-Free Ratio (iFR) pullback: a novel innovation using baseline physiology to optimise coronary angioplasty in tandem lesions | Q27027168 | ||
| Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses | Q28279558 | ||
| Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention | Q28306779 | ||
| Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study | Q34239429 | ||
| Classification performance of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve in a clinical population of intermediate coronary stenoses: results of the ADVISE registry | Q34295606 | ||
| Diagnostic classification of the instantaneous wave-free ratio is equivalent to fractional flow reserve and is not improved with adenosine administration. Results of CLARIFY (Classification Accuracy of Pressure-Only Ratios Against Indices Using Flow | Q34333418 | ||
| Multicenter core laboratory comparison of the instantaneous wave-free ratio and resting Pd/Pa with fractional flow reserve: the RESOLVE study | Q34383952 | ||
| Real-time use of instantaneous wave-free ratio: results of the ADVISE in-practice: an international, multicenter evaluation of instantaneous wave-free ratio in clinical practice. | Q34450432 | ||
| Pre-angioplasty instantaneous wave-free ratio pullback provides virtual intervention and predicts hemodynamic outcome for serial lesions and diffuse coronary artery disease | Q34451290 | ||
| Optimum guidance of complex PCI by coronary pressure measurement | Q35862860 | ||
| Prediction of Fractional Flow Reserve without Hyperemic Induction Based on Resting Baseline Pd/Pa | Q36909472 | ||
| Coronary pressure and flow relationships in humans: phasic analysis of normal and pathological vessels and the implications for stenosis assessment: a report from the Iberian-Dutch-English (IDEAL) collaborators | Q37084018 | ||
| Hemodynamic and intravascular ultrasound assessment of myocardial bridging: fractional flow reserve paradox with dobutamine versus adenosine | Q37597096 | ||
| Myocardial ischemia is a key factor in the management of stable coronary artery disease | Q37722766 | ||
| Fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: does coronary pressure never lie? | Q38187020 | ||
| Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Versus Routine Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Intermediate Coronary Stenosis: Five-Year Clinical Outcomes of DEFER-DES Trial | Q38398719 | ||
| Single bolus intravenous regadenoson injection versus central venous infusion of adenosine for maximum coronary hyperaemia in fractional flow reserve measurement | Q38425209 | ||
| Does routine pressure wire assessment influence management strategy at coronary angiography for diagnosis of chest pain?: the RIPCORD study | Q38434178 | ||
| Prognostic value of fractional flow reserve: linking physiologic severity to clinical outcomes | Q39199676 | ||
| P433 | issue | 3 | |
| P304 | page(s) | 183-195 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2016-05-24 | |
| P1433 | published in | Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics | Q27724051 |
| P1476 | title | FFR and iFR guided percutaneous coronary intervention | |
| P478 | volume | 31 |
| Q89993181 | Clinical expert consensus document on quantitative coronary angiography from the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics | cites work | P2860 |
Search more.