The JUPITER trial: myth or reality?

scientific article published on October 2011

The JUPITER trial: myth or reality? is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1051655028
P356DOI10.1007/S11883-011-0197-9
P8608Fatcat IDrelease_fynrw7pazng43ews33sk4rpfnq
P698PubMed publication ID21789573
P5875ResearchGate publication ID51521600

P2093author name stringSanjay Kaul
George A Diamond
Ryan P Morrissey
P2860cites workStatins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseaseQ24234813
C-reactive protein concentration and the vascular benefits of statin therapy: an analysis of 20,536 patients in the Heart Protection StudyQ24617734
The benefits of statins in people without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsQ24646234
Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive proteinQ29547752
Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statinsQ29547856
Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels: results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS. Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention StudyQ29617822
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trialsQ29617910
Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelinesQ29619614
Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromesQ29619716
Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomised controlled trialQ29619886
Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart AssociationQ30080021
Stopping at nothing? Some dilemmas of data monitoring in clinical trialsQ31116157
From here to JUPITER: identifying new patients for statin therapy using data from the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyQ33520621
Gauging the impact of statins using number needed to treatQ33882135
Statin-associated memory loss: analysis of 60 case reports and review of the literatureQ33967399
Statins and all-cause mortality in high-risk primary prevention: a meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials involving 65,229 participantsQ34123160
Cholesterol lowering, cardiovascular diseases, and the rosuvastatin-JUPITER controversy: a critical reappraisalQ34123164
Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trialQ34778589
Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases with statin therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsQ36665991
Early stopping of randomized clinical trials for overt efficacy is problematicQ37069734
Perioperative beta blockers in patients having non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysisQ37326885
Lipid lowering for primary preventionQ37433033
Stopping randomized trials early for benefit and estimation of treatment effects: systematic review and meta-regression analysisQ37717921
By Jove! What is a clinician to make of JUPITER?Q37768304
Number needed to treat with rosuvastatin to prevent first cardiovascular events and death among men and women with low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein: justification for the use of statins in prevQ38376809
Effects of statin therapy according to plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentration in the Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Trial in Heart Failure (CORONA): a retrospective analysisQ38377634
The cost-effectiveness of C-reactive protein testing and rosuvastatin treatment for patients with normal cholesterol levelsQ38464974
Relation of baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level to cardiovascular outcomes with rosuvastatin in the Justification for Use of statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER).Q38467359
The JUPITER trial: results, controversies, and implications for preventionQ38469911
Reduction in C-reactive protein and LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular event rates after initiation of rosuvastatin: a prospective study of the JUPITER trialQ38473723
Prevalence of low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with elevated high sensitivity C-reactive protein in the U.S.: implications of the JUPITER (Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating RosuvastatQ38473855
The JUPITER Trial: Responding to the CriticsQ42844459
Primary prevention of cardiovascular mortality and events with statin treatments: a network meta-analysis involving more than 65,000 patients.Q44370707
The Effect of Bisoprolol on Perioperative Mortality and Myocardial Infarction in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Vascular SurgeryQ56893725
Cost-minimization and the number needed to treat in uncomplicated hypertensionQ74673720
The cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin therapy JUPITER (justification for the use of statins in prevention: an intervention trial evaluating rosuvastatin)Q83395020
P433issue5
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)413-421
P577publication date2011-10-01
P1433published inCurrent Atherosclerosis ReportsQ20821076
P1476titleThe JUPITER trial: myth or reality?
P478volume13

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q35101153C-reactive protein levels in patients at cardiovascular risk: EURIKA study
Q36088110Statins as anti-inflammatory agents in atherogenesis: molecular mechanisms and lessons from the recent clinical trials.
Q38111961Statins in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

Search more.