The Epistemic Contract: Fostering an Appropriate Level of Public Trust in Experts

scientific article published on January 2015

The Epistemic Contract: Fostering an Appropriate Level of Public Trust in Experts is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1007/978-3-319-16151-8_9
P698PubMed publication ID26410926

P2093author name stringRobert J MacCoun
P2860cites workForecasting TournamentsQ56806803
Assessing uncertainty in physical constantsQ57697410
Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysisQ59442922
Cultural cognition of scientific consensusQ61478786
Economics. The promise of prediction marketsQ81296960
Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of TrustQ104376800
Editors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence?Q24273213
False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as SignificantQ24273231
Social science. Promoting transparency in social science research.Q24289118
US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer researchQ24289257
Politicization of Science in the Public SphereQ29011559
Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige pressQ29305422
The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risksQ29543192
Calibration trumps confidence as a basis for witness credibilityQ30443184
Are Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them?Q30456901
Just post it: the lesson from two cases of fabricated data detected by statistics aloneQ30663715
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth TellingQ34031507
The case for motivated reasoningQ34281854
Biases in the interpretation and use of research resultsQ34304570
Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: divergent perceptions of bias in self versus othersQ34333082
Psychological strategies for winning a geopolitical forecasting tournamentQ34411566
Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questionsQ35687445
Clinical versus actuarial judgmentQ38612327
Declines in trust in others and confidence in institutions among American adults and late adolescents, 1972-2012.Q39131772
Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologiesQ39931972
Continuously Cumulating Meta-Analysis and ReplicabilityQ40738647
Scientific wagers: Wanna bet?Q43822738
An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming.Q45933254
The public’s trust in scientific claims regarding offshore oil drillingQ46039903
Replication studies: Bad copyQ46759683
Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnologyQ47620180
Public opinion and trust in scientists: the role of the research context, and the perceived motivation of stem cell researchersQ48309930
Registered Replication Report: Schooler and Engstler-Schooler (1990).Q50577271
Public skepticism of psychology: why many people perceive the study of human behavior as unscientificQ53085329
Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidenceQ54296085
Communication and PersuasionQ54996175
Manufacturing uncertainty: contested science and the protection of the public's health and environment.Q55041042
The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design is Taking the Con out of EconometricsQ56047915
An Integrative Model Of Organizational TrustQ56442330
Intuitive evaluation of likelihood judgment producers: evidence for a confidence heuristicQ56674662
P304page(s)191-214
P577publication date2015-01-01
P1433published inNebraska Symposium on MotivationQ15750681
P1476titleThe Epistemic Contract: Fostering an Appropriate Level of Public Trust in Experts
P478volume62

Search more.