scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P356 | DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-16151-8_9 |
P698 | PubMed publication ID | 26410926 |
P2093 | author name string | Robert J MacCoun | |
P2860 | cites work | Forecasting Tournaments | Q56806803 |
Assessing uncertainty in physical constants | Q57697410 | ||
Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis | Q59442922 | ||
Cultural cognition of scientific consensus | Q61478786 | ||
Economics. The promise of prediction markets | Q81296960 | ||
Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust | Q104376800 | ||
Editors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence? | Q24273213 | ||
False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant | Q24273231 | ||
Social science. Promoting transparency in social science research. | Q24289118 | ||
US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research | Q24289257 | ||
Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere | Q29011559 | ||
Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press | Q29305422 | ||
The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks | Q29543192 | ||
Calibration trumps confidence as a basis for witness credibility | Q30443184 | ||
Are Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them? | Q30456901 | ||
Just post it: the lesson from two cases of fabricated data detected by statistics alone | Q30663715 | ||
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling | Q34031507 | ||
The case for motivated reasoning | Q34281854 | ||
Biases in the interpretation and use of research results | Q34304570 | ||
Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others | Q34333082 | ||
Psychological strategies for winning a geopolitical forecasting tournament | Q34411566 | ||
Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions | Q35687445 | ||
Clinical versus actuarial judgment | Q38612327 | ||
Declines in trust in others and confidence in institutions among American adults and late adolescents, 1972-2012. | Q39131772 | ||
Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies | Q39931972 | ||
Continuously Cumulating Meta-Analysis and Replicability | Q40738647 | ||
Scientific wagers: Wanna bet? | Q43822738 | ||
An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming. | Q45933254 | ||
The public’s trust in scientific claims regarding offshore oil drilling | Q46039903 | ||
Replication studies: Bad copy | Q46759683 | ||
Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology | Q47620180 | ||
Public opinion and trust in scientists: the role of the research context, and the perceived motivation of stem cell researchers | Q48309930 | ||
Registered Replication Report: Schooler and Engstler-Schooler (1990). | Q50577271 | ||
Public skepticism of psychology: why many people perceive the study of human behavior as unscientific | Q53085329 | ||
Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence | Q54296085 | ||
Communication and Persuasion | Q54996175 | ||
Manufacturing uncertainty: contested science and the protection of the public's health and environment. | Q55041042 | ||
The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design is Taking the Con out of Econometrics | Q56047915 | ||
An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust | Q56442330 | ||
Intuitive evaluation of likelihood judgment producers: evidence for a confidence heuristic | Q56674662 | ||
P304 | page(s) | 191-214 | |
P577 | publication date | 2015-01-01 | |
P1433 | published in | Nebraska Symposium on Motivation | Q15750681 |
P1476 | title | The Epistemic Contract: Fostering an Appropriate Level of Public Trust in Experts | |
P478 | volume | 62 |
Search more.