scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P50 | author | Guy Cowlishaw | Q91743445 |
P2093 | author name string | Andrew J King | |
P2860 | cites work | Group decision making in fission-fusion societies: evidence from two-field experiments in Bechstein's bats | Q28766817 |
Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move | Q29618043 | ||
Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology | Q29999482 | ||
Can a minority of informed leaders determine the foraging movements of a fish shoal? | Q33890107 | ||
Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon | Q35031811 | ||
Information flow, opinion polling and collective intelligence in house-hunting social insects | Q35031815 | ||
Public information: from nosy neighbors to cultural evolution | Q35845277 | ||
Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence | Q38630193 | ||
Nine-spined sticklebacks exploit the most reliable source when public and private information conflict. | Q55408369 | ||
Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases | Q55880016 | ||
Changes in vigilance with group size under scramble competition | Q73458093 | ||
Democracy in animal groups: a political science perspective | Q83345252 | ||
Many wrongs: the advantage of group navigation | Q83345398 | ||
P433 | issue | 2 | |
P921 | main subject | decision making | Q1331926 |
P304 | page(s) | 137-139 | |
P577 | publication date | 2007-04-01 | |
P1433 | published in | Biology Letters | Q43341 |
P1476 | title | When to use social information: the advantage of large group size in individual decision making | |
P478 | volume | 3 |
Q37117692 | Ant colonies outperform individuals when a sensory discrimination task is difficult but not when it is easy |
Q30598438 | Ants work harder during consensus decision-making in small groups |
Q55511961 | Catch the wave: prairie dogs assess neighbours' awareness using contagious displays. |
Q27301445 | Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) flexibly adjust their behaviour in order to maximize payoffs, not to conform to majorities |
Q27313669 | Collective Intelligence: Aggregation of Information from Neighbors in a Guessing Game |
Q34085607 | Collective animal behavior from Bayesian estimation and probability matching |
Q28585004 | Collective behaviour in vertebrates: a sensory perspective |
Q37611764 | Collective decision-making in microbes |
Q33889372 | Collective irrationality and positive feedback |
Q34058592 | Coordination and synchronisation of anti-predation vigilance in two crane species |
Q61809586 | Copy-the-majority of instances or individuals? Two approaches to the majority and their consequences for conformist decision-making |
Q38053133 | Darwin's monkey: why baboons can't become human |
Q51450390 | Decision accuracy in complex environments is often maximized by small group sizes. |
Q91865611 | Diversity of feeding habitats and diet composition in the turtle doves Streptopelia turtur to buffer loss and modification of natural habitats during breeding season |
Q30360759 | Emigration dynamics of cockroaches under different disturbance regimes do not depend on individual personalities |
Q34573237 | Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals |
Q33942078 | Group living enhances individual resources discrimination: the use of public information by cockroaches to assess shelter quality |
Q39454946 | Individual Confidence-Weighting and Group Decision-Making. |
Q88698971 | Individuals fail to reap the collective benefits of diversity because of over-reliance on personal information |
Q46787619 | Information Certainty Determines Social and Private Information Use in Ants. |
Q35648128 | Is leadership a reliable concept in animals? An empirical study in the horse |
Q41834043 | Is the true 'wisdom of the crowd' to copy successful individuals? |
Q35229112 | Larger groups of passerines are more efficient problem solvers in the wild. |
Q64907661 | Modular structure within groups causes information loss but can improve decision accuracy. |
Q47134661 | Nature of collective decision-making by simple yes/no decision units |
Q28608640 | Primate archaeology reveals cultural transmission in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) |
Q39750606 | Prospectors combine social and environmental information to improve habitat selection and breeding success in the subsequent year |
Q53435768 | Psychophysical Laws and the Superorganism. |
Q41902940 | Public information affects breeding dispersal in a colonial bird: kittiwakes cue on neighbours. |
Q37346498 | Quorum responses and consensus decision making |
Q61796279 | Quorums enable optimal pooling of independent judgements in biological systems |
Q21136253 | Recruitment strategies and colony size in ants |
Q33796587 | Scalable rules for coherent group motion in a gregarious vertebrate |
Q51469536 | Seasonality in communication and collective decision-making in ants. |
Q33640264 | Self-improvement for team-players: the effects of individual effort on aggregated group information |
Q28601983 | Self-organized flexible leadership promotes collective intelligence in human groups |
Q29353707 | Social and personal information use by squirrel monkeys in assessing predation risk |
Q36379527 | Social density processes regulate the functioning and performance of foraging human teams |
Q92830213 | Social learning strategies regulate the wisdom and madness of interactive crowds |
Q33760772 | Swarm intelligence in animal groups: when can a collective out-perform an expert? |
Q37204661 | Swarm-based medicine |
Q43526094 | The contribution of private and public information in foraging by Australasian gannets. |
Q51613376 | The effect of boldness on decision-making in barnacle geese is group-size-dependent. |
Q51859562 | The evolutionary basis of human social learning. |
Q33548713 | Use of social information in seabirds: compass rafts indicate the heading of food patches |
Search more.