Delayed assessment and eager adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: implications for developing surgical technologies

scientific article published on September 2010

Delayed assessment and eager adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: implications for developing surgical technologies is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814
editorialQ871232

External links are
P356DOI10.3748/WJG.V16.I33.4115
P932PMC publication ID2932913
P698PubMed publication ID20806426
P5875ResearchGate publication ID46096376

P50authorAlexander C AlloriQ42432582
P2093author name stringI Michael Leitman
Elizabeth Heitman
P2860cites workTranscolonic endoscopic cholecystectomy: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model (with video)Q28259113
Transcolonic endoscopic abdominal exploration: a NOTES survival study in a porcine modelQ28279374
Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being.Q30364670
Comparative effectiveness research and evidence-based health policy: experience from four countriesQ33896525
It's time to rethink health care technology assessment.Q36313486
ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery White Paper October 2005.Q36374412
Per-oral transgastric abdominal surgeryQ36462040
The costs and effects of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomiesQ36745887
Current status of natural orifice translumenal surgeryQ36886544
Taking NOTES: translumenal flexible endoscopy and endoscopic surgeryQ36925209
NOTES: the futureQ37125262
Comparative effectiveness research priorities: identifying critical gaps in evidence for clinical and health policy decision makingQ37556652
The national mortality burden and significant factors associated with open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: 1997-2006.Q37591370
Randomized clinical trial of small-incision and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis: primary and clinical outcomesQ38390859
An evaluation of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy.Q40814890
From "promising report" to "standard procedure": seven stages in the career of a medical innovationQ41475944
Recent results of elective open cholecystectomy in a North American and a European center. Comparison of complications and risk factorsQ42606247
Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy and the need for a randomized trial: a survey of surgeons and ethical committees in the British IslesQ42607056
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: cost analysisQ42614425
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomised control trials.Q42621266
The outcomes of elective laparoscopic and open cholecystectomies.Q42689537
Laparoscopic and laparotomic cholecystectomy: a randomized trial comparing postoperative respiratory functionQ43339731
Cholecystectomy--a new standardQ43423797
Celioscopic cholecystectomyQ43560298
Conventional versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the randomized controlled trial. Cholecystectomy Study GroupQ44052057
The case for reassessment of health care technology. Once is not enoughQ44229743
ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery. October 2005.Q44319389
Gallstones: laparoscopic treatment--cholecystectomy, cholecystostomy, and lithotripsy. Our own techniqueQ44582399
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: historic perspective and personal experienceQ47323107
A cost utility analysis of treatment options for gallstone disease: methodological issues and resultsQ47633609
Technical feasibility of endoscopic gastric reduction: a pilot study in a porcine modelQ48618749
Transgastric endoscopic splenectomy: is it possible?Q48727985
Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine modelQ48801528
How I developed laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Q48856898
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy--late resultsQ50150642
Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized study with special reference to obesityQ50150743
Complications of cholecystectomy by laparoscopic approach. Apropos of 6512 casesQ50150994
Advantages of mini-laparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a prospective randomized trialQ50151506
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is less expensive than open cholecystectomyQ50155074
The european experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomyQ50156684
Does "process utility" exist? A case study of willingness to pay for laparoscopic cholecystectomyQ50158467
Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitisQ50158838
Cholecystectomy under celioscopyQ50163711
Coelioscopic cholecystectomy. Preliminary report of 36 casesQ50163897
Gallstones: laparoscopic treatment, intracorporeal lithotripsy followed by cholecystostomy or cholecystectomy--a personal techniqueQ50165161
Current status of conventional (open) cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomyQ50169982
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Technique and complications. Report of 2,665 casesQ50174801
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the gold standardQ50176589
Case study: assessing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The GVHS experienceQ50177504
The endosurgical revolution: is it under control?Q50180343
Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a consensus?Q50180347
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind studyQ50180620
Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic cholecystectomyQ50193192
Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model.Q51233576
Ethical issues in technology assessment. Conceptual categories and procedural considerations.Q53567272
Transvaginal laparoscopic nephrectomy: development and feasibility in the porcine model.Q54301202
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy]Q67696596
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Late resultsQ67907435
Laparoscopic cholecystectomyQ68056002
NIH Consensus conference. Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomyQ70552083
Ten lessons for evidence-based technology assessmentQ73208192
Methodological approaches of health technology assessmentQ73412557
Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavityQ80270891
Natural orifice versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in a porcine model: a randomized, controlled trialQ84135692
P433issue33
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectcholecystectomyQ638774
P304page(s)4115-4122
P577publication date2010-09-01
P1433published inWorld Journal of GastroenterologyQ15708885
P1476titleDelayed assessment and eager adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: implications for developing surgical technologies
P478volume16

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q30490224Magnetic Surgery: Results from First Prospective Clinical Trial in 50 Patients
Q47893870Magnetic surgery: first U.S. experience with a novel device
Q40081727Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis based on factors predictive of postoperative pancreatic fistula.
Q33851988The voice of Holland: Dutch public and patient's opinion favours single-port laparoscopy

Search more.