review article | Q7318358 |
scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P356 | DOI | 10.1017/S0266462300011521 |
P698 | PubMed publication ID | 9780541 |
P2093 | author name string | Heitman E | |
P2860 | cites work | Economic incentives in clinical investigation | Q48924272 |
Ethics consultants' recommendations for life-prolonging treatment of patients in a persistent vegetative state. | Q50605020 | ||
The imperative character of medical technology and the meaning of "anticipated decision regret". | Q51183559 | ||
The heterogeneity of clinical ethics: the state of the field as reflected in the Encyclopedia of Bioethics. | Q53604446 | ||
Conflict of interest dilemmas in biomedical research. | Q53667232 | ||
Informing the Mammography Coverage Debate: Results of Meta-analysis, Computer Modeling, and Issue Analysis | Q67906308 | ||
HIV Testing is the Answer — What's the Question? | Q68511461 | ||
Discrimination against people with AIDS: the public's perspective | Q68511483 | ||
Medicine as an Institution of Social Control | Q69401598 | ||
Of mice but not men. Problems of the randomized clinical trial | Q70147509 | ||
Clinical research--what should the public believe? | Q72006136 | ||
Evaluating drugs after their approval for clinical use | Q72030575 | ||
Medical centers of excellence and health reform | Q72536041 | ||
Inclusion of women in clinical trials--policies for population subgroups | Q72792579 | ||
The status of health technology assessment worldwide. Results of an international survey | Q73269812 | ||
The state of the art versus the state of the science. The diffusion of new medical technologies into practice | Q77615613 | ||
Peer and/or peerless review. Some vagaries of the editorial process | Q93590209 | ||
Mass mammography. The time for reappraisal | Q33626209 | ||
Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research | Q34050273 | ||
Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery | Q34247334 | ||
Our stubborn quest for diagnostic certainty. A cause of excessive testing | Q34426850 | ||
Mass screening: theory and ethics | Q35168621 | ||
American and European recommendations for screening mammography in younger women: a cultural divide? | Q35190581 | ||
Problems in assessing the technology of critical care medicine | Q35382236 | ||
Irresponsible authorship and wasteful publication | Q36492358 | ||
The management of instability and incompleteness: clinical ethics and abstract expressionism | Q36852951 | ||
Minimizing the three stages of publication bias | Q38142609 | ||
Quality medical care. A definition | Q39712013 | ||
Technology transfer: trends in the federalization of biomedical research | Q40934045 | ||
Science, statistics, and deception | Q41492211 | ||
Priority setting for health technology assessment. Theoretical considerations and practical approaches. Priority setting Subgroup of the EUR-ASSESS Project | Q41508192 | ||
EUR-ASSESS Project Subgroup report on Methodology. Methodological guidance for the conduct of health technology assessment | Q41508198 | ||
EUR-ASSESS Project Subgroup Report on Dissemination and Impact | Q41508204 | ||
Confidential medical records and epidemiological research | Q42626082 | ||
Scientific basis for the support of biomedical science | Q43816083 | ||
The case for reassessment of health care technology. Once is not enough | Q44229743 | ||
The State of Federal Health Statistics on Racial and Ethnic Groups | Q44662815 | ||
The tomato effect. Rejection of highly efficacious therapies | Q47439794 | ||
Bioethics in pluralist societies | Q47594937 | ||
Pathways to the doctor—From person to patient | Q47709010 | ||
The relation between concepts of quality-of-life, health and happiness | Q47801957 | ||
P433 | issue | 3 | |
P304 | page(s) | 544-566 | |
P577 | publication date | 1998-01-01 | |
P1433 | published in | International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care | Q15750683 |
P1476 | title | Ethical issues in technology assessment. Conceptual categories and procedural considerations. | |
P478 | volume | 14 |
Q42432469 | Delayed assessment and eager adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: implications for developing surgical technologies |
Q48567605 | Different methods for ethical analysis in health technology assessment: an empirical study |
Q37863542 | Ethical issues of obesity surgery--a health technology assessment |
Q91896104 | Evaluation of Ethical Analyses in Seven Reports from the European Network for Health Technology Assessment |
Q53484712 | Guidelines for appropriate care: the importance of empirical normative analysis. |
Q58669138 | Health technology assessment (HTA): ethical aspects |
Q48704642 | Improving ethics analysis in health technology assessment |
Q36711649 | Mapping the integration of social and ethical issues in health technology assessment |
Q35088046 | Normative models of health technology assessment and the social production of evidence about telehealth care |
Q34120991 | Professional autonomy in the health care system |
Q50104667 | Setting the IMPACT (IMProve Access to Clinical Trial data) Observatory baseline. |
Q30351273 | Toward a procedure for integrating moral issues in health technology assessment. |
Q58301130 | What Is “NIPT”? Divergent Characterizations of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Strategies |
Q58670813 | Why ethics should be part of health technology assessment |
Search more.