Differences in citation frequency of clinical and basic science papers in cardiovascular research

scientific article published on 13 May 2011

Differences in citation frequency of clinical and basic science papers in cardiovascular research is …
instance of (P31):
editorialQ871232
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P8978DBLP publication IDjournals/mbec/Opthof11
P356DOI10.1007/S11517-011-0783-6
P932PMC publication ID3104007
P698PubMed publication ID21567267
P5875ResearchGate publication ID51121973

P50authorTobias OpthofQ122680406
P2860cites workComparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groupsQ24282591
An index to quantify an individual's scientific research outputQ24537699
A proposal for calculating weighted citations based on author rankQ24645715
Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusionQ28263850
Bibliometric data in clinical cardiology revisited. The case of 37 Dutch professorsQ33883833
Arrogance and ignorance in assessing scientific quality in a multidisciplinary academic medical centreQ33896136
Upregulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by HMG CoA reductase inhibitorsQ34463540
The Hirsch-index: a simple, new tool for the assessment of scientific output of individual scientists: The case of Dutch professors in clinical cardiologyQ37472934
Chance, concurrence, and clustering. Analysis of reviewers' recommendations on 1,000 submissions to the Journal of Clinical InvestigationQ40336211
The impact factor of leading cardiovascular journals: where is your paper best cited?Q41110532
Biomedical engineering and bibliometric indices for scientific qualityQ42648247
Interactions between science and art.Q52112117
The significance of the peer review process against the background of bias: priority ratings of reviewers and editors and the prediction of citation, the role of geographical bias.Q52945912
How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor: Normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of scienceQ57396548
Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performanceQ57396569
Normalization at the field level: Fractional counting of citationsQ57396588
Scopus's source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citationsQ57396609
Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerationsQ57904115
Rivals for the crown: Reply to Opthof and LeydesdorffQ57904116
Assassins and zealots: variations in peer review. Special reportQ68195768
P275copyright licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 GenericQ44128984
P6216copyright statuscopyrightedQ50423863
P433issue6
P921main subjectcitationQ1713
citation analysisQ206276
P304page(s)613-621
P577publication date2011-05-13
P1433published inMedical & Biological Engineering & ComputingQ6806252
P1476titleDifferences in citation frequency of clinical and basic science papers in cardiovascular research
P478volume49

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q38635946At the Leading Front of Neuroscience: A Bibliometric Study of the 100 Most-Cited Articles.
Q34701357Citation analysis may severely underestimate the impact of clinical research as compared to basic research
Q57274669Global neuroscience and mental health research: a bibliometrics case study
Q89448115Global research productions pertaining to atrial fibrillation from 2004 to 2018: A bibliometric analysis
Q102318111How Many Neurosurgeons Does It Take to Author an Article and What Are The 'Other' Factors That Impact Citations?
Q38280162Impact factor 2013 of the Netherlands Heart Journal surpasses 2.0.
Q42333648Introducing altmetrics to the Journal of the Medical Library Association
Q24040334Predicting Productivity Returns on Investment: Thirty Years of Peer Review, Grant Funding, and Publication of Highly Cited Papers at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Q37038437Scientometric Analysis and Mapping of Scientific Articles on Diabetic Retinopathy
Q42978976The Nightingale Prize 2011 for best MBEC paper in 2010.
Q48286880The Nightingale Prize for best MBEC paper in 2011.
Q41814749The impact factor of the Netherlands Heart Journal in 2013.

Search more.