| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P8978 | DBLP publication ID | journals/joi/WaltmanELVR11 |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1016/J.JOI.2010.08.001 |
| P50 | author | Ludo Waltman | Q56085880 |
| Nees Jan van Eck | Q56475605 | ||
| Thed N van Leeuwen | Q83197643 | ||
| Martijn S Visser | Q90442630 | ||
| Anthony F J van Raan | Q90797432 | ||
| P433 | issue | 1 | |
| P304 | page(s) | 37-47 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2011-01-01 | |
| P1433 | published in | Journal of Informetrics | Q6295355 |
| P1476 | title | Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations | |
| P478 | volume | 5 |
| Q35157009 | A comment to the paper by Waltman et al., Scientometrics, 87, 467-481, 2011 |
| Q34034626 | A recursive field-normalized bibliometric performance indicator: an application to the field of library and information science |
| Q40253020 | A rejoinder on energy versus impact indicators |
| Q36101245 | Alternatives to the journal impact factor: I3 and the top-10% (or top-25%?) of the most-highly cited papers |
| Q36503319 | An evaluation of impacts in “Nanoscience & nanotechnology”: steps towards standards for citation analysis |
| Q56220069 | Are citations from clinical trials evidence of higher impact research? An analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Q56220056 | Avoiding obscure topics and generalising findings produces higher impact research |
| Q31039072 | Bibliometric analysis of output and impact based on CRIS data: a case study on the registered output of a Dutch university. |
| Q34701357 | Citation analysis may severely underestimate the impact of clinical research as compared to basic research |
| Q57564810 | Citation analysis with microsoft academic |
| Q122609889 | Comparison of two article-level, field-independent citation metrics: Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and Relative Citation Ratio (RCR) |
| Q42741086 | Differences in citation frequency of clinical and basic science papers in cardiovascular research |
| Q42240389 | Discussing some basic critique on Journal Impact Factors: revision of earlier comments |
| Q58602227 | Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective |
| Q56220090 | Does research with statistics have more impact? The citation rank advantage of structural equation modeling |
| Q57984427 | Dynamic subfield analysis of disciplines: an examination of the trading impact and knowledge diffusion patterns of computer science |
| Q57984430 | Finding knowledge paths among scientific disciplines |
| Q35023376 | Global myeloma research clusters, output, and citations: a bibliometric mapping and clustering analysis |
| Q56219998 | How quickly do publications get read? The evolution of mendeley reader counts for new articles |
| Q57396550 | How to evaluate universities in terms of their relative citation impacts: Fractional counting of citations and the normalization of differences among disciplines |
| Q58602273 | How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications |
| Q56220033 | Is medical research informing professional practice more highly cited? Evidence from AHFS DI Essentials in drugs.com |
| Q29032830 | Meta-assessment of bias in science |
| Q35665984 | Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity |
| Q56219979 | National scientific performance evolution patterns: Retrenchment, successful expansion, or overextension |
| Q38638194 | Normalizing Google Scholar data for use in research evaluation |
| Q42240385 | Properties of journal impact in relation to bibliometric research group performance indicators |
| Q36124092 | Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level |
| Q106987955 | Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A new metric that uses citation rates to measure influence at the article level |
| Q57904101 | Source normalized indicators of citation impact: an overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison |
| Q57984406 | The funding factor: a cross-disciplinary examination of the association between research funding and citation impact |
| Q56475674 | The inconsistency of the h-index |
| Q58781501 | To what extent does the Leiden manifesto also apply to altmetrics? A discussion of the manifesto against the background of research into altmetrics |
| Q34836858 | Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis |
| Q57396564 | Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents |
| Q31141953 | Twitter Predicts Citation Rates of Ecological Research. |
| Q56475736 | Universality of citation distributions revisited |
| Q36039681 | What Is a Complex Innovation System? |
| Q58996783 | What proportion of excellent papers makes an institution one of the best worldwide? Specifying thresholds for the interpretation of the results of the SCImago Institutions Ranking and the Leiden Ranking |
Search more.