| meta-analysis | Q815382 |
| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P50 | author | John Ioannidis | Q6251482 |
| Rodrigo Costas | Q57115976 | ||
| P2093 | author name string | Daniele Fanelli | |
| P2860 | cites work | Do pressures to publish increase scientists' bias? An empirical support from US States Data | Q21090019 |
| "Positive" results increase down the Hierarchy of the Sciences | Q21136404 | ||
| Why current publication practices may distort science | Q21563409 | ||
| Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries | Q24273200 | ||
| A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too) | Q24273251 | ||
| When should potentially false research findings be considered acceptable? | Q24288771 | ||
| Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature | Q24288789 | ||
| US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research | Q24289257 | ||
| Accelerating scientific publication in biology | Q24669514 | ||
| Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review | Q24673248 | ||
| Editorial: Journal of negative results in biomedicine | Q24800278 | ||
| Bibliometric Evidence for a Hierarchy of the Sciences | Q27313418 | ||
| Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases | Q28274123 | ||
| Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility | Q28597738 | ||
| Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices | Q28606958 | ||
| Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature | Q29614233 | ||
| Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias | Q29619094 | ||
| Researchers' Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century. | Q30385483 | ||
| Extension of Nakagawa & Schielzeth's R(2)GLMM to random slopes models | Q30473463 | ||
| Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 | Q30477923 | ||
| Early extreme contradictory estimates may appear in published research: the Proteus phenomenon in molecular genetics research and randomized trials | Q31170846 | ||
| Systematic review data extraction: cross-sectional study showed that experience did not increase accuracy | Q33493731 | ||
| Unpublished results hide the decline effect | Q34166781 | ||
| Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research | Q34700701 | ||
| Six domains of research ethics. A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research | Q34715726 | ||
| Institutions' expectations for researchers' self-funding, federal grant holding, and private industry involvement: manifold drivers of self-interest and researcher behavior | Q34767148 | ||
| Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity | Q35665984 | ||
| Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias | Q36152510 | ||
| Males are overrepresented among life science researchers committing scientific misconduct | Q36551889 | ||
| Are Men More Likely than Women To Commit Scientific Misconduct? Maybe, Maybe Not | Q36756592 | ||
| Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis | Q37329334 | ||
| Cancer patients' attitudes toward future research uses of stored human biological materials | Q40179198 | ||
| Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists | Q41277188 | ||
| Reply to Nuijten et al.: Reanalyses actually confirm that US studies overestimate effects in softer research | Q42432494 | ||
| Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. | Q43997069 | ||
| Publish or perish in China | Q44764610 | ||
| A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis | Q52067551 | ||
| Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods | Q52141807 | ||
| Science mapping analysis characterizes 235 biases in biomedical research | Q53066866 | ||
| Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations | Q57904115 | ||
| Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture: A worldwide survey | Q58291584 | ||
| Personality and ethical decision-making in research: the role of perceptions of self and others | Q58672529 | ||
| Pressures to Publish: Catalysts for the Loss of Scientific Writing Integrity? | Q58952950 | ||
| P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
| P921 | main subject | bias | Q742736 |
| reproducibility | Q1425625 | ||
| replication crisis | Q25303778 | ||
| P304 | page(s) | 201618569 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2017-03-20 | |
| P1433 | published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | Q1146531 |
| P1476 | title | Meta-assessment of bias in science |
| Q57154459 | "Reproducible" Research in Mathematical Sciences Requires Changes in our Peer Review Culture and Modernization of our Current Publication Approach |
| Q64890091 | A theory and methodology to quantify knowledge. |
| Q90751715 | Acute tryptophan loading decreases functional connectivity between the default mode network and emotion-related brain regions |
| Q55092113 | Adequate statistical power in clinical trials is associated with the combination of a male first author and a female last author. |
| Q92403841 | Are Effect Sizes in Emotional Intelligence Field Declining? A Meta-Meta Analysis |
| Q92627392 | Blood Flow-restricted Exercise Does Not Induce a Cross-Transfer of Effect: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| Q90472183 | Cannabinoids, cannabis, and cannabis-based medicine for pain management: a protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and a systematic review of randomised controlled trials |
| Q92229492 | Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects |
| Q56348168 | Diagnostic Performance of Extracellular Volume, Native T1, and T2 Mapping Versus Lake Louise Criteria by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Detection of Acute Myocarditis: A Meta-Analysis |
| Q92350326 | Does scientific effort reflect global need? A review of infectious disease publications over 100 years |
| Q57167050 | Effect of maternal mental health improvement programs on obesity in pediatric populations: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Q34557703 | Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain in adults. |
| Q94469368 | Global and regional prevalence, burden, and risk factors for carotid atherosclerosis: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and modelling study |
| Q91861493 | Global, regional, and national prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2015: an updated systematic review and analysis |
| Q80185762 | How to Detect Publication Bias in Psychological Research: A Comparative Evaluation of Six Statistical Methods |
| Q90049605 | Introducing our series: research synthesis and meta-research in biology |
| Q53274555 | Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? |
| Q56394789 | Lack of research reproducibility, the rise of open science and the need for continuing education in research methods |
| Q52658008 | Meta-research: Why research on research matters |
| Q48094320 | Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure |
| Q64087865 | National and subnational estimation of the prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Q90276715 | Neuropathic pain clinical trials: factors associated with decreases in estimated drug efficacy |
| Q91668293 | Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond |
| Q39153206 | Opioids for cancer pain - an overview of Cochrane reviews. |
| Q38682609 | Oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for cancer pain in adults. |
| Q94333994 | Oral nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for cancer pain in adults |
| Q94333686 | Oral paracetamol (acetaminophen) for cancer pain |
| Q38682606 | Oral paracetamol (acetaminophen) for cancer pain. |
| Q52582065 | Potential Reporting Bias in Neuroimaging Studies of Sex Differences |
| Q64356942 | Pregabalin for neuropathic pain in adults |
| Q64052497 | Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis |
| Q56142179 | Redefine statistical significance |
| Q88555888 | Reduced mortality rates among caregivers: Does family caregiving provide a stress-buffering effect? |
| Q92141148 | Reevaluating Benefits in the Moral Justification of Animal Research: A Comment on "Necessary Conditions for Morally Responsible Animal Research" |
| Q55425023 | Reporting bias in the literature on the associations of health-related behaviors and statins with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. |
| Q63362610 | Research Weaving: Visualizing the Future of Research Synthesis |
| Q47806243 | Science as a Matter of Honour: How Accused Scientists Deal with Scientific Fraud in Japan. |
| Q92644010 | Study protocol: Impact of quality improvement interventions on perinatal outcomes in health facilities-a systematic review |
| Q61940298 | Studying grant decision-making: a linguistic analysis of review reports |
| Q92188163 | Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Correlates of FFMQ Mindfulness Facets |
| Q92730078 | Temporal Instability of Evidence Base: A Threat to Policy Making? |
| Q49826341 | Testing Hypotheses on Risk Factors for Scientific Misconduct via Matched-Control Analysis of Papers Containing Problematic Image Duplications |
| Q93055502 | The dark side of the force: Multiplicity issues in network meta-analysis and how to address them |
| Q38683193 | The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research |
| Q38782574 | Tramadol with or without paracetamol (acetaminophen) for cancer pain. |
| Q64272799 | Understanding of researcher behavior is required to improve data reliability |
| Q64125712 | Why replication has more scientific value than original discovery |
| Q92144272 | Women using hormonal contraceptives show increased valence ratings and memory performance for emotional information |
Search more.