Why replication has more scientific value than original discovery

scientific article published on 01 January 2018

Why replication has more scientific value than original discovery is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1017/S0140525X18000729
P698PubMed publication ID31064545

P50authorJohn IoannidisQ6251482
P2860cites workObtaining evidence by a single well-powered trial or several modestly powered trialsQ48371779
Implausible results in human nutrition research.Q54600212
Redefine statistical significanceQ56142179
Why most published research findings are falseQ21092395
Why Most Discovered True Associations Are InflatedQ24273233
This I believe in genetics: discovery can be a nuisance, replication is science, implementation mattersQ24273368
Increasing disparities between resource inputs and outcomes, as measured by certain health deliverables, in biomedical researchQ24289253
A manifesto for reproducible scienceQ28341964
Meta-assessment of bias in scienceQ29032830
Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015.Q39919762
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)e137
P577publication date2018-01-01
P1433published inBehavioral and Brain SciencesQ814445
P1476titleWhy replication has more scientific value than original discovery
P478volume41

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q92902629Editorial: Replication and Reliability in Behavior Science and Behavior Analysis: A Call for a Conversation
Q59793592Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015-2017

Search more.