| Q56475850 | -learning agents in a Cournot oligopoly model |
| Q36113005 | A Large-Scale Analysis of Impact Factor Biased Journal Self-Citations |
| Q38579061 | A Longitudinal Analysis of Publications on Maternal Mortality |
| Q57904129 | A Novel Algorithm for Visualizing Concept Associations |
| Q56476010 | A Theoretical Analysis of Cooperative Behavior in Multi-agent Q-learning |
| Q106351288 | A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS |
| Q56475661 | A mathematical analysis of the long-run behavior of genetic algorithms for social modeling |
| Q106351303 | A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science |
| Q109416226 | A principled methodology for comparing relatedness measures for clustering publications |
| Q34034626 | A recursive field-normalized bibliometric performance indicator: an application to the field of library and information science |
| Q112116133 | A review of the literature on citation impact indicators |
| Q95627155 | A scientometric overview of CORD-19 |
| Q104791549 | A scientometric overview of CORD-19 |
| Q57904083 | A smart local moving algorithm for large-scale modularity-based community detection |
| Q57904085 | A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators |
| Q56475799 | A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks |
| Q65512559 | Accuracy of citation data in Web of Science and Scopus |
| Q57904088 | An Evolutionary Model of Price Competition Among Spatially Distributed Firms |
| Q59664977 | An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing |
| Q56475876 | Appropriate similarity measures for author co‐citation analysis |
| Q39348549 | Automatic term identification for bibliometric mapping |
| Q57904125 | BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING OF THE COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE FIELD |
| Q125499330 | Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information |
| Q29649990 | Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics |
| Q58830585 | Characterizing in-text citations in scientific articles: A large-scale analysis |
| Q111972194 | CitNetExplorer: A new software tool for analyzing and visualizing citation networks |
| Q34701357 | Citation analysis may severely underestimate the impact of clinical research as compared to basic research |
| Q33592071 | Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer |
| Q36002043 | Clustering Scientific Publications Based on Citation Relations: A Systematic Comparison of Different Methods |
| Q44027077 | Collaborations span 1,553 kilometres |
| Q106351295 | Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting |
| Q100526644 | Correction to 'Intermediacy of publications' |
| Q57904092 | Counting publications and citations: Is more always better? |
| Q116694760 | Crossref as a source of open bibliographic metadata |
| Q57904108 | Economic modeling using evolutionary algorithms: the effect of a binary encoding of strategies |
| Q28544654 | Exploring the relationship between the engineering and physical sciences and the health and life sciences by advanced bibliometric methods |
| Q63937257 | From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities |
| Q115662678 | Funding COVID-19 research: Insights from an exploratory analysis using open data infrastructures |
| Q56475866 | Generalizing the h- and g-indices |
| Q56475778 | Globalisation of science in kilometres |
| Q106351285 | How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures |
| Q55262445 | Improving the evaluation of worldwide biomedical research output: classification method and standardised bibliometric indicators by disease. |
| Q112777480 | Innovations in peer review in scholarly publishing: a meta-summary |
| Q90698528 | Intermediacy of publications |
| Q74211527 | Is the Nature Index at odds with DORA? |
| Q113442015 | Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and Scopus |
| Q109415915 | Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic |
| Q106988073 | Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic [preprint] |
| Q104876823 | Leiden Manifesto |
| Q106351224 | Message from the new Editor-in-Chief |
| Q37939094 | On the correlation between bibliometric indicators and peer review: reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff |
| Q56475830 | On the proper understanding of the limiting behavior of generalizations of the h- and g-indices |
| Q86246519 | Opening science: The rebirth of a scholarly journal |
| Q57984431 | PageRank-Related Methods for Analyzing Citation Networks |
| Q110750974 | Responsible metrics: One size doesn’t fit all |
| Q92356975 | Rethinking impact factors: better ways to judge a journal |
| Q57904116 | Rivals for the crown: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff |
| Q56475843 | Robust Evolutionary Algorithm Design for Socio-Economic Simulation: Some Comments |
| Q52370247 | Science of science |
| Q40992931 | Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping |
| Q57904100 | Some Limitations of the H Index: A Commentary on Ruscio and Colleagues' Analysis of Bibliometric Indices |
| Q56475838 | Some comments on Egghe's derivation of the impact factor distribution |
| Q56475870 | Some comments on the journal weighted impact factor proposed by Habibzadeh and Yadollahie |
| Q57904096 | Some modifications to the SNIP journal impact indicator |
| Q57904101 | Source normalized indicators of citation impact: an overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison |
| Q124304887 | Sunlight not shadows: Double-anonymized peer review is not the progressive answer to status bias |
| Q57986600 | The Closer the Better: Similarity of Publication Pairs at Different Cocitation Levels |
| Q124304875 | The Journal Observatory – Connecting information on scholarly communication |
| Q115661543 | The challenges of scientometric studies of predatory publishing |
| Q56475786 | The detection of “hot regions” in the geography of science—A visualization approach by using density maps |
| Q56475674 | The inconsistency of the h-index |
| Q56475817 | The relation between Eigenfactor, audience factor, and influence weight |
| Q58830622 | Topic identification challenge |
| Q57904115 | Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations |
| Q34836858 | Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis |
| Q56475736 | Universality of citation distributions revisited |
| Q114254463 | Use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles: Statistically flawed or not? |
| Q106351290 | VOS: A New Method for Visualizing Similarities Between Objects |
| Q106351289 | Visualizing Bibliometric Networks |
| Q56475962 | Visualizing the Computational Intelligence Field |
| Q57904131 | Visualizing the WCCI 2006 Knowledge Domain |
| Q56476004 | Visualizing the computational intelligence field [Application Notes] |