| human | Q5 |
| P2456 | DBLP author ID | 16/2425 |
| P6178 | Dimensions author ID | 01340127426.82 |
| P2798 | Loop ID | 290811 |
| P496 | ORCID iD | 0000-0001-7814-8951 |
| P1153 | Scopus author ID | 6603501746 |
| P10861 | Springer Nature person ID | 01340127426.82 |
| P734 | family name | Boyack | Q36938822 |
| Boyack | Q36938822 | ||
| Boyack | Q36938822 | ||
| P735 | given name | Kevin | Q605834 |
| Kevin | Q605834 | ||
| P106 | occupation | researcher | Q1650915 |
| P21 | sex or gender | male | Q6581097 |
| Q58830767 | A Call to Researchers |
| Q102220258 | A detailed open access model of the PubMed literature |
| Q34378301 | A list of highly influential biomedical researchers, 1996-2011. |
| Q99546603 | A novel approach to predicting exceptional growth in research |
| Q109416226 | A principled methodology for comparing relatedness measures for clustering publications |
| Q92564059 | A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field |
| Q113207361 | AI Research Funding Portfolios and Extreme Growth |
| Q58830692 | An Introduction to Modeling Science: Basic Model Types, Key Definitions, and a General Framework for the Comparison of Process Models |
| Q57437859 | Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature |
| Q112297780 | Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: How open is open? |
| Q45954443 | Bibliometrics: Is your most cited work your best? |
| Q58830641 | Characterization of the Peer Review Network at the Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health |
| Q34041995 | Characterization of the peer review network at the Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health |
| Q58830585 | Characterizing in-text citations in scientific articles: A large-scale analysis |
| Q58830663 | Characterizing the emergence of two nanotechnology topics using a contemporaneous global micro-model of science |
| Q36124104 | Citation Metrics: A Primer on How (Not) to Normalize |
| Q89524647 | Citation metrics for appraising scientists: misuse, gaming and proper use |
| Q114263637 | Citations and certainty: a new interpretation of citation counts |
| Q58830656 | Classification of individual articles from all of science by research level |
| Q28741835 | Clustering more than two million biomedical publications: comparing the accuracies of nine text-based similarity approaches |
| Q58830709 | Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? |
| Q30736654 | Comparative analysis of multiple genome-scale data sets |
| Q58830598 | Comparison of topic extraction approaches and their results |
| Q42341594 | Correction: Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines |
| Q58830668 | Creation of a highly detailed, dynamic, global model and map of science |
| Q28727206 | Design and update of a classification system: the UCSD map of science |
| Q58830762 | Domain visualization using VxInsight® for science and technology management |
| Q58830781 | Dual-stokes cars system for simulataneous measurement of temperature and multiple species in turbulent flames |
| Q47547356 | Dynamics of co-authorship and productivity across different fields of scientific research |
| Q35203804 | Estimates of the continuously publishing core in the scientific workforce |
| Q58830745 | Evaluation of Laboratory Directed Research and Development investment areas at Sandia |
| Q114608308 | How relevant is climate change research for climate change policy? An empirical analysis based on Overton data |
| Q58830735 | Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science |
| Q58830637 | Identifying emerging topics in science and technology |
| Q58830686 | Improving the accuracy of co-citation clustering using full text |
| Q58830646 | Including cited non-source items in a large-scale map of science: What difference does it make? |
| Q58830753 | Indicator-assisted evaluation and funding of research: Visualizing the influence of grants on the number and citation counts of research papers |
| Q58830605 | Investigating the effect of global data on topic detection |
| Q58830650 | Mapping altruism |
| Q35667134 | Mapping knowledge domains: characterizing PNAS |
| Q58830747 | Mapping the backbone of science |
| Q58830713 | Mapping the structure and evolution of chemistry research |
| Q58830729 | Mapping, illuminating, and interacting with science |
| Q114257900 | Massive covidization of research citations and the citation elite |
| Q58830721 | Measuring science–technology interaction using rare inventor–author names |
| Q35083000 | Metrics associated with NIH funding: a high-level view |
| Q36065928 | Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines |
| Q58830704 | OpenOrd: an open-source toolbox for large graph layout |
| Q58830776 | Prosperity Game to Teach Global Competitiveness to University Students |
| Q58830740 | Quantitative evaluation of large maps of science |
| Q59793592 | Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015-2017 |
| Q58830612 | Research portfolio analysis and topic prominence |
| Q58830742 | Robust Methods for Microarray Analysis |
| Q57986600 | The Closer the Better: Similarity of Publication Pairs at Different Cocitation Levels |
| Q28584127 | The Research Focus of Nations: Economic vs. Altruistic Motivations |
| Q58830618 | Thesaurus-based methods for mapping contents of publication sets |
| Q58830723 | Thought leadership: A new indicator for national and institutional comparison |
| Q56600499 | Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days |
| Q58830622 | Topic identification challenge |
| Q58830715 | Toward a consensus map of science |
| Q58830711 | Toward an objective, reliable and accurate method for measuring research leadership |
| Q58581529 | Toward predicting research proposal success |
| Q100678361 | Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators |
| Q58830717 | Using detailed maps of science to identify potential collaborations |
| Q58830706 | Using global mapping to create more accurate document-level maps of research fields |
| Q108476548 | Visualizing knowledge domains |
| Q58830591 | Which Type of Citation Analysis Generates the Most Accurate Taxonomy of Scientific and Technical Knowledge? |
| Q98161888 | Work honored by Nobel prizes clusters heavily in a few scientific fields |
Search more.