Volume and outcome in rectal cancer surgery: the importance of quality management

scientific article published on 10 November 2012

Volume and outcome in rectal cancer surgery: the importance of quality management is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1053225208
P356DOI10.1007/S00384-012-1596-2
P698PubMed publication ID23143162

P50authorSusanne MerkelQ51740942
P2093author name stringWerner Hohenberger
Paul Hermanek
P2860cites workWorkload and surgeon´s specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgeryQ24201131
Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resectionQ24542266
The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence?Q29300453
Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 1: short-term outcomeQ33267193
Colorectal cancer: is the surgeon a prognostic factor? A systematic reviewQ33772795
Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999.Q33963913
Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancerQ34552041
The Swedish rectal cancer registryQ34581452
Impact of variability among surgeons on postoperative morbidity and mortality and ultimate survivalQ34585222
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin versus fluorouracil alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: initial results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomised phase 3 trialQ34638544
Surgeons' volume of colorectal cancer procedures and collaborative decision-making about adjuvant therapiesQ35064897
Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 2: long-term outcomeQ36689357
Reporting colorectal cancer.Q36699554
The effect of hospital and surgeon volume on outcomes for rectal cancer surgeryQ36970059
Effect of surgeon training, specialization, and experience on outcomes for cancer surgery: a systematic review of the literatureQ37483583
Time to locoregional recurrence after curative resection of rectal carcinoma is prolonged after neoadjuvant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Q37628790
Impact of surgeon volume on outcomes of rectal cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysisQ37800538
Surgeon-related variables and the clinical trialQ39507810
Surgeon volume does not predict outcomes in the setting of technical credentialing: results from a randomized trial in colon cancerQ40033689
The importance of volume in colorectal cancer surgeryQ44189566
Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in The NetherlandsQ44612913
Volume-outcome analysis of colorectal cancer-related outcomes.Q45775619
Volume-outcome analysis in rectal cancer: a plea for enquiry, evidence and evolutionQ46627054
The surgeon as a prognostic factor after the introduction of total mesorectal excision in the treatment of rectal cancer.Q50761007
[Effect of regional centralized treatment on chances of survival in rectal cancer in East Germany]Q53035666
The influence of abdomino-peranal (intersphincteric) resection of lower third rectal carcinoma on the rates of sphincter preservation and locoregional recurrenceQ58028799
Local recurrence following 'curative' surgery for large bowel cancer: I. The overall pictureQ71250097
Prognostic factors of rectum carcinoma--experience of the German Multicentre Study SGCRC. German Study Group Colo-Rectal CarcinomaQ71770597
The German experience: the surgeon as a prognostic factor in colon and rectal cancer surgeryQ73280482
[Criteria for evaluating prognostic factors]Q73948279
Impact of surgeon's technique on outcome after treatment of rectal carcinomaQ77800236
[Update S3-guideline "colorectal cancer" 2008]Q81899161
P433issue2
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)197-206
P577publication date2012-11-10
P1433published inInternational Journal of Colorectal DiseaseQ15758189
P1476titleVolume and outcome in rectal cancer surgery: the importance of quality management
P478volume28

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q43440524A hundred patients with vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap for pelvic reconstruction after total pelvic exenteration.
Q52878875Documented quality of care in certified colorectal cancer centers in Germany: German Cancer Society benchmarking report for 2013.
Q89966337Evaluation of the learning curve of transanal total mesorectal excision: single-centre experience
Q45899260Identifying Factors That Influence Physicians' Recommendations for Dialysis and Conservative Management in Indonesia.
Q53835609Impact of colorectal surgeon case volume on outcomes and applications to quality improvement.
Q35068085Increased number of negative lymph nodes is associated with improved cancer specific survival in pathological IIIB and IIIC rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy
Q41143378Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Resection in High-Volume Surgical Centers: Long-Term Outcomes from the LAPCOLON Group Trial
Q38134007MRI-based treatment of rectal cancer: is prognostication of the recurrence risk solid enough to render radiation redundant?
Q46329607Nerve-oriented mesorectal excision (NOME): autonomic nerves as landmarks for laparoscopic rectal resection
Q34986863Omental pedicle flaps following proctectomy: a systematic review
Q55443389Our 20-year experience with experimental colonic anastomotic healing.
Q37697526Personalized surgical management of colorectal cancer in elderly population
Q48335924Predicting opportunities to increase utilization of laparoscopy for rectal cancer.
Q85856308Rectal cancer : when is the local recurrence risk low enough to refrain from the aim to prevent it?
Q45390164Safety of elective colorectal cancer surgery: non-surgical complications and colectomies are targets for quality improvement
Q33895569Systematic review and a meta-analysis of hospital and surgeon volume/outcome relationships in colorectal cancer surgery
Q40086355The DGAV risk calculator: development and validation of statistical models for a web-based instrument predicting complications of colorectal cancer surgery
Q38667105Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a training pathway.

Search more.