Systematic review and a meta-analysis of hospital and surgeon volume/outcome relationships in colorectal cancer surgery

scientific article

Systematic review and a meta-analysis of hospital and surgeon volume/outcome relationships in colorectal cancer surgery is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.21037/JGO.2017.01.25
P932PMC publication ID5506277
P698PubMed publication ID28736640

P50authorYa Ruth HuoQ85263885
P2093author name stringKevin Phan
David L Morris
Winston Liauw
P2860cites workHospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resectionQ24542266
Surgeon and hospital characteristics as predictors of major adverse outcomes following colon cancer surgery: understanding the volume-outcome relationship.Q53580816
Evolution of the surgeon-volume, patient-outcome relationship.Q55052015
The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancerQ57846887
Hospital procedure volume and teaching status do not influence treatment and outcome measures of rectal cancer surgery in a large general populationQ58877878
Influence of volume of work on the outcome of treatment for patients with colorectal cancerQ61853068
Effect of hospital volume on quality of care and outcome after rectal cancer surgeryQ62513632
Influence of hospital- and surgeon-related factors on outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative radiotherapyQ73387955
Surgeon volume compared to hospital volume as a predictor of outcome following primary colon cancer resectionQ73446798
Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national studyQ73669703
Complex gastrointestinal surgery: impact of provider experience on clinical and economic outcomesQ77988615
Does it matter what a hospital is "high volume" for? Specificity of hospital volume-outcome associations for surgical procedures: analysis of administrative dataQ80823326
Surgeon and hospital volume and the management of colorectal cancer patients in AustraliaQ81244147
Influence of hospital volume on the frequency of abdominoperineal resection and long-term oncological outcomes in low rectal cancerQ81433559
Influence of hospital volume on local recurrence and survival in a population sample of rectal cancer patientsQ81723179
Volume-outcome relationship in rectal cancer surgery: a new perspectiveQ84308677
The impact of hospital volume on surgical outcome in patients with rectal cancerQ84427236
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statementQ27860606
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology: A Proposal for ReportingQ27861077
A combined measure of procedural volume and outcome to assess hospital quality of colorectal cancer surgery, a secondary analysis of clinical audit dataQ30761794
Hospital caseload and the results achieved in patients with rectal cancer.Q34093049
Influence of volume and specialization on survival following surgery for colorectal cancerQ34318129
Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgeryQ34482407
Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery.Q34605544
Influence of hospital and clinician workload on survival from colorectal cancer: cohort studyQ37456807
Surgeon knowledge contributes to the relationship between surgeon volume and patient outcomes in rectal cancerQ38042529
Systematic review of methodological quality of individual performance measurement in surgery.Q38250277
Association of hospital participation in a surgical outcomes monitoring program with inpatient complications and mortality.Q38342497
Journey to top performance: a multipronged quality improvement approach to reducing cardiac surgery mortalityQ38562031
Are high-volume surgeons and hospitals the most important predictors of in-hospital outcome for colon cancer resection?Q39614910
Association of surgeon volume and hospital volume with the outcome of patients receiving definitive surgery for colorectal cancer: A nationwide population-based studyQ41041776
Pledging to Eliminate Low-Volume SurgeryQ41252306
Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortalityQ42595587
Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations: results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement ProgramQ42610384
Impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colonic cancerQ42652048
The impact of hospital volume on the number of nodes retrieved and outcome in colorectal cancer.Q43790472
Population-based study of risk factors for postoperative death after anterior resection of the rectumQ44247636
Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.Q44464097
Effects of hospital and surgeon volumes on operating times, postoperative complications, and length of stay following laparoscopic colectomyQ44733727
Volume and outcome in rectal cancer surgery: the importance of quality managementQ45061884
Volume-outcome analysis of colorectal cancer-related outcomes.Q45775619
What predicts serious complications in colorectal cancer resection?Q45971271
Variations in treatment of rectal cancer: the influence of hospital type and caseloadQ46246302
Relation of surgeon and hospital volume to processes and outcomes of colorectal cancer surgeryQ46303039
Impact of hospital procedure volume on surgical operation and long-term outcomes in high-risk curatively resected rectal cancer: findings from the Intergroup 0114 StudyQ47289113
Association of Hospital Procedure Volume and Outcomes in Patients with Colon Cancer at High Risk for RecurrenceQ47433325
Influence of Surgical Subspecialty Training on In-Hospital Mortality for Gastrectomy and Colectomy PatientsQ47580978
Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancerQ47769261
Relation of hospital volume to colostomy rates and survival for patients with rectal cancerQ47898024
Hospital volume and outcome of rectal cancer surgery in Denmark 1994-99.Q50579299
Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection.Q50652036
Effect of hospital caseload on long-term outcome after standardization of rectal cancer surgery at a national level.Q50753133
The surgeon as a prognostic factor after the introduction of total mesorectal excision in the treatment of rectal cancer.Q50761007
The influence of the surgeon's and the hospital's caseload on survival and local recurrence after colorectal cancer surgery.Q50778901
Trends in hospital and surgeon volume and operative mortality for cancer surgery.Q50780284
Quality, not volume, determines outcome of coronary artery bypass surgery in a university-based community hospital network.Q50991801
Low-volume centre vs high-volume: the role of a quality assurance programme in colon cancer surgery.Q51165899
P433issue3
P921main subjectcolorectal carcinomaQ25493920
colorectal cancerQ188874
P304page(s)534-546
P577publication date2017-06-01
P1433published inJournal of gastrointestinal oncologyQ26842467
P1476titleSystematic review and a meta-analysis of hospital and surgeon volume/outcome relationships in colorectal cancer surgery
P478volume8

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q64972864A Comparison of Pathologic Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Resections for Rectal Cancer Using the ACS-NSQIP Proctectomy-Targeted Database: a Propensity Score Analysis.
Q57024261Association Between Hospital and Surgeon Volume and Rectal Cancer Surgery Outcomes in Patients With Rectal Cancer Treated Since 2000: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis
Q92527759Comparison of clinical outcomes between laparoscopic and open surgery for left-sided colon cancer: a nationwide population-based study
Q57288689Effect of hospital and surgeon volume on postoperative outcomes after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on data from 145,523 Japanese patients collected from a nationwide web-based data entry system
Q47655638Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers.
Q90261256Surgeon perceived most important factors to achieve the best hospital performance on colorectal cancer surgery: a Dutch modified Delphi method

Search more.