Association Between Hospital and Surgeon Volume and Rectal Cancer Surgery Outcomes in Patients With Rectal Cancer Treated Since 2000: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis

scientific article published on 01 November 2018

Association Between Hospital and Surgeon Volume and Rectal Cancer Surgery Outcomes in Patients With Rectal Cancer Treated Since 2000: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1097/DCR.0000000000001198
P932PMC publication ID7000208
P698PubMed publication ID30286023

P50authorMarin SchweizerQ63373942
P2093author name stringMary E Charlton
Catherine Chioreso
Jennifer Schlichting
Irena Gribovskaja-Rupp
Natalie Del Vecchio
P2860cites workWorkload and surgeon´s specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgeryQ24201131
Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: Model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in resultsQ24273227
Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resectionQ24542266
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysisQ27860672
Systematic review and a meta-analysis of hospital and surgeon volume/outcome relationships in colorectal cancer surgeryQ33895569
Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgeryQ34222930
Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States.Q34279907
Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancerQ34552041
Impact of functional results on quality of life after rectal cancer surgeryQ34566175
Optimizing the outcome for patients with rectal cancerQ35081605
Sphincter-sparing surgery after preoperative radiotherapy for low rectal cancers: feasibility, oncologic results and quality of life outcomesQ36621297
The effect of hospital and surgeon volume on outcomes for rectal cancer surgeryQ36970059
Surgeon knowledge contributes to the relationship between surgeon volume and patient outcomes in rectal cancerQ38042529
Population-based use of sphincter-preserving surgery in patients with rectal cancer: is there room for improvement?Q38104985
Surgeon Annual and Cumulative Volumes Predict Early Postoperative Outcomes after Rectal Cancer ResectionQ39068677
No Difference in Overall Survival Between Hospital Volumes for Patients With Colorectal Cancer in The NetherlandsQ39414589
Effect of hospital caseload on long-term outcome after standardization of rectal cancer surgery in the Spanish Rectal Cancer Project.Q39524517
High volume improves outcomes: The argument for centralization of rectal cancer surgery.Q40312921
Hospital variability in postoperative mortality after rectal cancer surgery in the Spanish Association of Surgeons project: The impact of hospital volume.Q40364731
The Influence of Hospital Volume on Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement: Results of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal AuditQ41193032
Impact of short-term preoperative radiotherapy on health-related quality of life and sexual functioning in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trialQ43320281
The association of hospital volume with rectal cancer surgery outcomes.Q43962156
Variation in treatment and outcome of patients with rectal cancer by region, hospital type and volume in the Netherlands.Q44063715
Occurrence of second cancers in patients treated with radiotherapy for rectal cancerQ44186419
Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancerQ44519873
Relation of surgeon and hospital volume to processes and outcomes of colorectal cancer surgeryQ46303039
Actionable indicators for short and long term outcomes in rectal cancerQ46361045
Variability in the quality of rectal cancer care in public hospitals in Catalonia (Spain): clinical audit as a basis for actionQ46597908
Cancer statistics, 2018.Q47191906
Quality of rectal cancer surgery and its relationship to surgeon and hospital caseload: a population-based studyQ47579865
Pathologic Complete Response Rates After Neoadjuvant Treatment in Rectal Cancer: An Analysis of the National Cancer DatabaseQ47755992
Variation in case-mix between hospitals treating colorectal cancer patients in the Netherlands.Q51006211
[Hospital variation in anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery in the Spanish Association of Surgeons project: The contribution of hospital volume].Q51300795
The influence of hospital volume and surgical treatment delay on long-term survival after cancer surgeryQ57224786
Effect of hospital volume on quality of care and outcome after rectal cancer surgeryQ62513632
The relationship between the extent of distal clearance and survival and local recurrence rates after curative anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectumQ71785437
Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measuresQ80163866
Influence of hospital volume on the frequency of abdominoperineal resection and long-term oncological outcomes in low rectal cancerQ81433559
Volume-outcome relationship in rectal cancer surgery: a new perspectiveQ84308677
No difference between lowest and highest volume hospitals in outcome after colorectal cancer surgery in the southern NetherlandsQ85941798
Optimizing rectal cancer management: analysis of current evidenceQ87055032
P433issue11
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectsystematic reviewQ1504425
P304page(s)1320-1332
P577publication date2018-11-01
P1433published inDiseases of the Colon & RectumQ15731527
P1476titleAssociation Between Hospital and Surgeon Volume and Rectal Cancer Surgery Outcomes in Patients With Rectal Cancer Treated Since 2000: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis
P478volume61

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q90618555Nationwide in-hospital mortality rate following rectal resection for rectal cancer according to annual hospital volume in Germany
Q90261256Surgeon perceived most important factors to achieve the best hospital performance on colorectal cancer surgery: a Dutch modified Delphi method

Search more.