Institutional futility policies are inherently unfair

scientific article published in September 2013

Institutional futility policies are inherently unfair is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1007/S10730-012-9194-9
P698PubMed publication ID22903421
P5875ResearchGate publication ID230698331

P2093author name stringPhilip M Rosoff
P2860cites workAdvance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before deathQ24600180
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesQ28247791
Planning for pandemic influenza: effect of a pandemic on the supply and demand for blood products in the United States.Q30361932
The language of prognostication in intensive care unitsQ33615602
Racial differences in parents' distrust of medicine and researchQ33743697
Physicians' observations and interpretations of the influence of religion and spirituality on healthQ33840813
Religion, conscience, and controversial clinical practicesQ33840889
The diagnosis of brain deathQ34223099
Race and trust in the health care systemQ34756284
Race and the intensive care unit: disparities and preferences for end-of-life care.Q35138442
The influence of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status on end-of-life care in the ICU.Q35409828
End-of-life choices for African-American and white infants in a neonatal intensive-care unit: a pilot studyQ35836213
Futility and rationingQ35900282
Medical futility: definition, determination, and disputes in critical careQ36256077
Surviving surrogate decision-making: what helps and hampers the experience of making medical decisions for othersQ36416738
Racial and ethnic differences in end-of-life costs: why do minorities cost more than whites?Q36753600
Discordance between patient-predicted and model-predicted life expectancy among ambulatory patients with heart failure.Q36758142
Texas hospitals' experience with the Texas Advance Directives Act.Q36783283
Institutional policies on determination of medically inappropriate interventions: use in five pediatric patientsQ36784963
Disparities in liver transplantation before and after introduction of the MELD scoreQ36806996
Brain death - too flawed to endure, too ingrained to abandonQ36828890
Futility: a concept in evolutionQ37031776
Doubt and belief in physicians' ability to prognosticate during critical illness: the perspective of surrogate decision makersQ37065980
What explains racial differences in the use of advance directives and attitudes toward hospice care?Q37074123
Differences in level of care at the end of life according to raceQ37154664
Hospital staff attributions of the causes of physician variation in end-of-life treatment intensityQ37253549
Medical inappropriateness review: appropriately performed by a medical committee.Q37594067
The Texas Advance Directives Act--is it a good model?Q37633168
The empirical basis for determinations of medical futility.Q37774286
Racial-ethnic disparities in stroke care: the American experience: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke AssociationQ37880516
Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implicationsQ37923286
Medical futility: response to critiquesQ38458781
Racial disparities in access to cardiac rehabilitationQ39766402
Medical futility and the Texas Advance Directives Act of 1999.Q40563812
Recognizing bedside rationing: clear cases and tough callsQ41306317
The effect of reimbursement on medical decision making: do physicians alter treatment in response to a managed care incentive?Q43957053
The illusion of futility in clinical practiceQ44118313
Ego bias, reverse ego bias, and physicians' prognosticQ44948996
The answer to "What are my chances, doctor?" depends on whom is asked: prognostic disagreement and inaccuracy for critically ill patients.Q45040375
Futility and the common cold. How requests for antibiotics can illuminate care at the end of life.Q45981092
Operating on commission: analyzing how physician financial incentives affect surgery ratesQ46156335
Damage compounded: disparities, distrust, and disparate impact in end-of-life conflict resolution policiesQ46233355
Health literacy not race predicts end-of-life care preferencesQ46272261
Does professional autonomy protect medical futility judgments?Q46332650
Understanding and supporting African Americans' perspectives of end-of-life care planning and decision makingQ46478916
High rates of advance care planning in New York City's elderly populationQ46826108
Negotiating cross-cultural issues at the end of life: "You got to go where he lives".Q46891579
Ethnicity and attitudes towards life sustaining technologyQ47348664
When parents request seemingly futile treatment for their children.Q47595149
Avoiding family feuds: responding to surrogate demands for life-sustaining interventionsQ47601381
Influence of physicians' life stances on attitudes to end-of-life decisions and actual end-of-life decision-making in six countriesQ47699433
Resolution of Futility by Due Process: Early Experience with the Texas Advance Directives ActQ47935948
Treatment of VIPsQ48434556
Caring for VIPs: nine principlesQ48448747
End-of-life decision-making in the United StatesQ48500398
Futility, autonomy, and cost in end-of-life careQ48672527
The preferential treatment of VIPs in the emergency departmentQ48868760
The self-fulfilling prophecy in intensive care.Q48946344
Counterpoint: The Texas advance directives act is ethically flawed: medical futility disputes must be resolved by a fair processQ49009325
Point: The Texas advance directives act effectively and ethically resolves disputes about medical futilityQ49009337
The development of "medical futility": towards a procedural approach based on the role of the medical profession.Q53103043
Medical futility, patient autonomy, and professional integrity: finding the appropriate balance.Q53140379
Should ethics consultants help clinicians face scarcity in their practice?Q53152760
Futility--from hospital policies to state laws.Q53225306
Ethics committees under Texas law: effects of the Texas Advance Directives Act.Q53489192
The Texas Advance Directives Act of 1999: politics and reality.Q53489198
Factors associated with do-not-resuscitate orders: patients' preferences, prognoses, and physicians' judgments. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.Q53618928
Nonbeneficial or futile medical treatment: conflict resolution guidelines for the San Francisco Bay area. Bay Area Network of Ethics Committees (BANEC) Nonbeneficial Treatment Working GroupQ58673531
Parents with doubts about vaccines: which vaccines and reasons whyQ64133645
A multi-institution collaborative policy on medical futilityQ71263564
A definition of irreversible coma. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain DeathQ72143707
Futility in pediatrics: from case to policyQ73136753
The rise and fall of the futility movementQ74055499
Preserving end-of-life autonomy: the Patient Self-Determination Act and the Uniform Health Care Decisions ActQ77622359
Futility revisited: reflections on the perspectives of families, physicians, and institutionsQ83199915
Futility in medical decisions: the word and the conceptQ83199916
When atlas shrugs: may the state wash its hands of those in need of life-sustaining medical treatment?Q84532700
P433issue3
P304page(s)191-209
P577publication date2013-09-01
P1433published inHEC ForumQ26841929
P1476titleInstitutional futility policies are inherently unfair
P478volume25