Routinely collected data for randomized trials: promises, barriers, and implications

scientific article published on 11 January 2018

Routinely collected data for randomized trials: promises, barriers, and implications is …
instance of (P31):
review articleQ7318358
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1100316374
P356DOI10.1186/S13063-017-2394-5
P932PMC publication ID5765645
P698PubMed publication ID29325575

P50authorJohn IoannidisQ6251482
Shaun TreweekQ49649781
Rustam Al-Shahi SalmanQ55205960
William WhiteleyQ56246698
Heidi R GardnerQ91843633
Daniel StrechQ38323151
P2093author name stringLars G Hemkens
Kimberly A Mc Cord
P2860cites workWhy Most Clinical Research Is Not UsefulQ24707972
Concordance of effects of medical interventions on hospital admission and readmission rates with effects on mortalityQ27022171
Cancer: Reshaping the cancer clinic.Q55459748
Long-term follow-up of the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention StudyQ81421539
The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statementQ28268166
Key cost drivers of pharmaceutical clinical trials in the United StatesQ28273573
Ethics and Informed Consent for Comparative Effectiveness Research With Prospective Electronic Clinical DataQ28293291
Registry-based randomized controlled trials- what are the advantages, challenges, and areas for future research?Q30244292
Routinely collected data and comparative effectiveness evidence: promises and limitationsQ31046490
Personalized Prescription Feedback Using Routinely Collected Data to Reduce Antibiotic Use in Primary Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Q31151586
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trialsQ33545409
Developing a simplified consent form for biobankingQ33719347
The Canadian Joint Replacement Registry-what have we learned?Q33795867
Spectral Anonymization of DataQ33836850
Review of electronic patient-reported outcomes systems used in cancer clinical careQ33890495
Ethics of undisclosed payments to doctors recruiting patients in clinical trialsQ34721331
Cognitive behaviour therapy plus aerobic exercise training to increase activity in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) compared to usual care (OPTIMISTIC): study protocol for randomised controlled trialQ35668084
A template for broad consent in biobank research. Results and explanation of an evidence and consensus-based development processQ36004022
Learning from failure--rationale and design for a study about discontinuation of randomized trials (DISCO study).Q36483995
Attitudes Toward Risk and Informed Consent for Research on Medical Practices: A Cross-sectional SurveyQ36647444
Cost-effective recruitment methods for a large randomised trial in people with diabetes: A Study of Cardiovascular Events iN Diabetes (ASCEND).Q37002683
Registry-Based Pragmatic Trials in Heart Failure: Current Experience and Future DirectionsQ37710165
Review of 103 Swedish Healthcare Quality RegistriesQ38244987
Pragmatic Randomized Trials Without Standard Informed Consent?: A National Survey.Q38555205
Data collection in pragmatic trials.Q38675069
Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 1. IntroductionQ38760839
Standards for Clinical Research: Keeping Pace With the Technology of the FutureQ38788621
Errors in Diagnosis of Spinal Epidural Abscesses in the Era of Electronic Health RecordsQ38862043
The future of cardiovascular clinical research: informatics, clinical investigators, and community engagementQ39526865
Good documentation practice in clinical researchQ42022822
Why clinical trial outcomes fail to translate into benefits for patientsQ42316662
The randomized registry trial--the next disruptive technology in clinical research?Q44663056
Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctionQ44802449
Mega-trials for blockbustersQ46205856
Randomized, Controlled Trials in Health Insurance SystemsQ47552244
Registry-based randomized controlled trials merged the strength of randomized controlled trails and observational studies and give rise to more pragmatic trialsQ47916918
Informed consent for pragmatic trials--the integrated consent modelQ48085411
P275copyright licenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 InternationalQ20007257
P6216copyright statuscopyrightedQ50423863
P433issue1
P921main subjectbiomedical investigative techniqueQ66648976
P304page(s)29
P577publication date2018-01-11
P1433published inTrialsQ7840023
P1476titleRoutinely collected data for randomized trials: promises, barriers, and implications
P478volume19

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q55434066Automated recruitment and randomisation for an efficient randomised controlled trial in primary care.
Q64243476Current use and costs of electronic health records for clinical trial research: a descriptive study
Q91910874Electronic health record nested pragmatic randomized controlled trial of a reminder system for serum lithium level monitoring in patients with mood disorder: KONOTORI study protocol
Q90729350Factors associated with patient-reported likelihood of using online self-care interventions: a Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) cohort study
Q61805558Identifying Parkinson's disease and parkinsonism cases using routinely collected healthcare data: A systematic review
Q89030293Noninferiority studies: Not inherently unethical
Q89599863Online randomized controlled experiments at scale: lessons and extensions to medicine
Q58599551Protocol for the development of a CONSORT extension for RCTs using cohorts and routinely collected health data
Q59337428The reporting of studies conducted using observational routinely collected health data statement for pharmacoepidemiology (RECORD-PE)

Search more.