scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P6179 | Dimensions Publication ID | 1101344266 |
P356 | DOI | 10.1186/S40246-018-0144-8 |
P932 | PMC publication ID | 5839067 |
P698 | PubMed publication ID | 29506557 |
P50 | author | Anna Sundby | Q59137329 |
Kristoffer Solvsten Burgdorf | Q62750068 | ||
Thomas F. Hansen | Q37651587 | ||
Henrik Ullum | Q40974711 | ||
P2093 | author name string | Ole Mors | |
Merete Watt Boolsen | |||
P2860 | cites work | Exploring the potential duty of care in clinical genomics under UK law. | Q41716228 |
Parents perspectives on whole genome sequencing for their children: qualified enthusiasm? | Q47381603 | ||
Pediatric Issues in Return of Results and Incidental Findings: Weighing Autonomy and Best Interests | Q47582153 | ||
The iPSYCH2012 case-cohort sample: new directions for unravelling genetic and environmental architectures of severe mental disorders. | Q47619056 | ||
Public's Views toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing: It's (Almost) All about the Choice | Q47810737 | ||
Stability of Attitudes to the Ethical Issues Raised by the Return of Incidental Genomic Research Findings in Children: A Follow-Up Study | Q47969754 | ||
Whole genome sequencing in children: ethics, choice and deliberation | Q48302546 | ||
Storage policies and use of the Danish Newborn Screening Biobank. | Q50545746 | ||
The Danish Blood Donor Study: a large, prospective cohort and biobank for medical research. | Q50554757 | ||
Empirical research on the ethics of genomic research. | Q52934373 | ||
Stakeholders in psychiatry and their attitudes toward receiving pertinent and incident findings in genomic research. | Q55057864 | ||
Whole-Exome Sequencing Reveals Increased Burden of Rare Functional and Disruptive Variants in Candidate Risk Genes in Individuals With Persistent Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder | Q56986291 | ||
Attitudes of parents toward the return of targeted and incidental genomic research findings in children | Q57642631 | ||
Online questionnaire development: using film to engage participants and then gather attitudes towards the sharing of genomic data | Q28660579 | ||
Using whole-exome sequencing to identify inherited causes of autism | Q30418126 | ||
Potential research participants support the return of raw sequence data | Q30659412 | ||
Biological specimen banks in neonatal screening | Q33812120 | ||
Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing | Q33858610 | ||
Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between | Q34000877 | ||
Finding people who will tell you their thoughts on genomics-recruitment strategies for social sciences research | Q34156882 | ||
Returning incidental findings from genetic research to children: views of parents of children affected by rare diseases | Q34238585 | ||
Children, biobanks and the scope of parental consent | Q35108619 | ||
Parent and public interest in whole-genome sequencing | Q35528249 | ||
Developing a policy for paediatric biobanks: principles for good practice | Q36497109 | ||
Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research | Q36695880 | ||
Assessing hypothetical scenario methodology in genetic susceptibility testing analog studies: a quantitative review | Q37002555 | ||
Raising Genomic Citizens: Adolescents and the Return of Secondary Genomic Findings | Q37041787 | ||
Incidental findings in the era of whole genome sequencing? | Q37156528 | ||
Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings | Q37297065 | ||
Legal approaches regarding health-care decisions involving minors: implications for next-generation sequencing | Q37415290 | ||
Overcoming recruitment barriers revealed high readiness to participate and low dropout rate among people with schizophrenia in a randomized controlled trial testing the effect of a Guided Self-Determination intervention | Q37589908 | ||
Is "incidental finding" the best term?: a study of patients' preferences | Q37624443 | ||
Biobanks and the return of research results: out with the old and in with the new? | Q37956337 | ||
To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethical reflections on incidental findings arising in genetics contexts. | Q38022136 | ||
Genetic dilemmas and the child's right to an open future | Q40902012 | ||
P433 | issue | 1 | |
P921 | main subject | psychiatry | Q7867 |
P304 | page(s) | 12 | |
P577 | publication date | 2018-03-05 | |
P1433 | published in | Human genomics | Q26842690 |
P1476 | title | Attitudes of stakeholders in psychiatry towards the inclusion of children in genomic research. | |
P478 | volume | 12 |
Q92621882 | Attitudes toward the right to autonomous decision-making in psychiatric genetic testing: Controversial and context-dependent |
Q90266341 | Ethical Challenges of Germline Genetic Enhancement |
Q57784513 | Psychiatric genetics researchers' views on offering return of results to individual participants |
Q93064641 | Psychiatric genomics researchers' perspectives on best practices for returning results to individual participants |
Q92512605 | Rethinking the "open future" argument against predictive genetic testing of children |
Q100504063 | Return of results in a global survey of psychiatric genetics researchers: practices, attitudes, and knowledge |
Search more.