Attitudes of stakeholders in psychiatry towards the inclusion of children in genomic research.

scientific article published on 5 March 2018

Attitudes of stakeholders in psychiatry towards the inclusion of children in genomic research. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1101344266
P356DOI10.1186/S40246-018-0144-8
P932PMC publication ID5839067
P698PubMed publication ID29506557

P50authorAnna SundbyQ59137329
Kristoffer Solvsten BurgdorfQ62750068
Thomas F. HansenQ37651587
Henrik UllumQ40974711
P2093author name stringOle Mors
Merete Watt Boolsen
P2860cites workExploring the potential duty of care in clinical genomics under UK law.Q41716228
Parents perspectives on whole genome sequencing for their children: qualified enthusiasm?Q47381603
Pediatric Issues in Return of Results and Incidental Findings: Weighing Autonomy and Best InterestsQ47582153
The iPSYCH2012 case-cohort sample: new directions for unravelling genetic and environmental architectures of severe mental disorders.Q47619056
Public's Views toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing: It's (Almost) All about the ChoiceQ47810737
Stability of Attitudes to the Ethical Issues Raised by the Return of Incidental Genomic Research Findings in Children: A Follow-Up StudyQ47969754
Whole genome sequencing in children: ethics, choice and deliberationQ48302546
Storage policies and use of the Danish Newborn Screening Biobank.Q50545746
The Danish Blood Donor Study: a large, prospective cohort and biobank for medical research.Q50554757
Empirical research on the ethics of genomic research.Q52934373
Stakeholders in psychiatry and their attitudes toward receiving pertinent and incident findings in genomic research.Q55057864
Whole-Exome Sequencing Reveals Increased Burden of Rare Functional and Disruptive Variants in Candidate Risk Genes in Individuals With Persistent Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity DisorderQ56986291
Attitudes of parents toward the return of targeted and incidental genomic research findings in childrenQ57642631
Online questionnaire development: using film to engage participants and then gather attitudes towards the sharing of genomic dataQ28660579
Using whole-exome sequencing to identify inherited causes of autismQ30418126
Potential research participants support the return of raw sequence dataQ30659412
Biological specimen banks in neonatal screeningQ33812120
Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencingQ33858610
Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in betweenQ34000877
Finding people who will tell you their thoughts on genomics-recruitment strategies for social sciences researchQ34156882
Returning incidental findings from genetic research to children: views of parents of children affected by rare diseasesQ34238585
Children, biobanks and the scope of parental consentQ35108619
Parent and public interest in whole-genome sequencingQ35528249
Developing a policy for paediatric biobanks: principles for good practiceQ36497109
Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing researchQ36695880
Assessing hypothetical scenario methodology in genetic susceptibility testing analog studies: a quantitative reviewQ37002555
Raising Genomic Citizens: Adolescents and the Return of Secondary Genomic FindingsQ37041787
Incidental findings in the era of whole genome sequencing?Q37156528
Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findingsQ37297065
Legal approaches regarding health-care decisions involving minors: implications for next-generation sequencingQ37415290
Overcoming recruitment barriers revealed high readiness to participate and low dropout rate among people with schizophrenia in a randomized controlled trial testing the effect of a Guided Self-Determination interventionQ37589908
Is "incidental finding" the best term?: a study of patients' preferencesQ37624443
Biobanks and the return of research results: out with the old and in with the new?Q37956337
To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethical reflections on incidental findings arising in genetics contexts.Q38022136
Genetic dilemmas and the child's right to an open futureQ40902012
P433issue1
P921main subjectpsychiatryQ7867
P304page(s)12
P577publication date2018-03-05
P1433published inHuman genomicsQ26842690
P1476titleAttitudes of stakeholders in psychiatry towards the inclusion of children in genomic research.
P478volume12

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q92621882Attitudes toward the right to autonomous decision-making in psychiatric genetic testing: Controversial and context-dependent
Q90266341Ethical Challenges of Germline Genetic Enhancement
Q57784513Psychiatric genetics researchers' views on offering return of results to individual participants
Q93064641Psychiatric genomics researchers' perspectives on best practices for returning results to individual participants
Q92512605Rethinking the "open future" argument against predictive genetic testing of children
Q100504063Return of results in a global survey of psychiatric genetics researchers: practices, attitudes, and knowledge

Search more.