Putting the public back into public health. Part II. How can public health be accountable to the public?

scientific article published in January 2003

Putting the public back into public health. Part II. How can public health be accountable to the public? is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/S0033-3506(02)00008-2
P698PubMed publication ID12802908

P2093author name stringR F Heller
S Pattison
T D Heller
P2860cites workDisease impact number and population impact number: population perspectives to measures of risk and benefitQ24524813
Consumer health informaticsQ24527282
Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health careQ24655465
An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatmentQ28297274
What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment?Q33733306
Ethics and evidence based medicineQ33789701
Retracing the Oregon trail: the experience of rationing and the Oregon health planQ33790745
Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough?Q33793584
Experiences with "rapid appraisal" in primary care: involving the public in assessing health needs, orientating staff, and educating medical studentsQ33793865
Using evidence to inform health policy: case studyQ33803885
Patient choice modules for summaries of clinical effectiveness: a proposalQ33804535
Evidence based policy: proceed with careQ33806586
Evidence based purchasing: understanding results of clinical trials and systematic reviewsQ34297134
Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trialQ35170467
A population perspective to evidence based medicine: "evidence for population health".Q35406411
Risk language and dialectsQ36246659
Cancer: science and society and the communication of riskQ36600442
Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative studyQ37330631
Translating research findings into health policyQ41165465
Statins: underused by those who would benefitQ42768879
How policy informs the evidenceQ42770396
One Bristol, but there could have been manyQ42773155
Patient-initiated treatment of uncomplicated recurrent urinary tract infections in young womenQ43659767
Putting the public back into public health. Part I. A re-definition of public health.Q45951594
Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease.Q51180198
Alternative medicine--learning from the past, examining the present, advancing to the future.Q52182197
Building international public health vision through local community research: the El Puente-CIET partnership.Q53341123
Measured enthusiasm: does the method of reporting trial results alter perceptions of therapeutic effectiveness?Q67587263
Helping patients take responsibility for their own healthQ74128281
P433issue1
P304page(s)66-71
P577publication date2003-01-01
P1433published inPublic HealthQ15761423
P1476titlePutting the public back into public health. Part II. How can public health be accountable to the public?
P478volume117

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q37324389Continuing professional development and social accountability: a review of the literature
Q37293473Engaging and mobilizing community members to prevent obesity among adolescents.
Q54888107Health needs assessment: Involving older people in health research
Q50143293The health role of local area coordinators in Scotland: a mixed methods study

Search more.