| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00118-8 |
| P698 | PubMed publication ID | 12900202 |
| P894 | zbMATH Open document ID | 1464.92180 |
| P2093 | author name string | Parker GA | |
| Ball MA | |||
| P2860 | cites work | Benefits of Multiple Mates in the Cricket Gryllus bimaculatus | Q30040249 |
| Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits | Q33877784 | ||
| Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review. | Q33915740 | ||
| Sperm competition games: a comparison of loaded raffle models and their biological implications | Q34050291 | ||
| Establishing cryptic female choice in animals. | Q39516292 | ||
| Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. | Q40801522 | ||
| Optimal copula duration in yellow dung flies: effects of female size and egg content. | Q40822190 | ||
| On sperm competition games: raffles and roles revisited | Q52207048 | ||
| Sperm competition I: basic model, ESS and dynamics | Q52227055 | ||
| Sperm competition games: a general approach to risk assessment | Q52234404 | ||
| Sperm competition games: a prospective analysis of risk assessment | Q52250269 | ||
| Sperm Competition Games: Inter- and Intra-species Results of a Continuous External Fertilization Model | Q52261933 | ||
| Skewed paternity and sex allocation in hermaphroditic plants and animals | Q52591726 | ||
| Spermicide by females: what should males do? | Q55434322 | ||
| On sperm competition games: incomplete fertilization risk and the equity paradox. | Q55649429 | ||
| SPERM COMPETITION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES IN THE INSECTS | Q55878159 | ||
| Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females | Q55881563 | ||
| Why are there so many tiny sperm? Sperm competition and the maintenance of two sexes | Q55895450 | ||
| Why do Females Make it so Difficult for Males to Fertilize their Eggs? | Q56637976 | ||
| The evolution of polyandry II: post-copulatory defenses against genetic incompatibility | Q56656962 | ||
| Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games | Q56658229 | ||
| Why do female adders copulate so frequently? | Q59093042 | ||
| Sperm competition games between related males | Q73940553 | ||
| Multi-male mating and female choice increase offspring growth in the spiderNeriene litigiosa(Linyphiidae) | Q74237439 | ||
| Female genotype affects male success in sperm competition | Q93603942 | ||
| Sperm selection and genetic incompatibility: does relatedness of mates affect male success in sperm competition? | Q93605573 | ||
| P433 | issue | 1 | |
| P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
| P6104 | maintained by WikiProject | WikiProject Mathematics | Q8487137 |
| P1104 | number of pages | 16 | |
| P304 | page(s) | 27-42 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2003-09-01 | |
| P1433 | published in | Journal of Theoretical Biology | Q2153724 |
| P1476 | title | Sperm competition games: sperm selection by females | |
| P478 | volume | 224 |
| Q39288177 | Characterisation of an in vitro system to study maternal communication with spermatozoa |
| Q24677573 | Costly but worthless gifts facilitate courtship |
| Q24648445 | Cryptic preference for MHC-dissimilar females in male red junglefowl, Gallus gallus |
| Q60336871 | Differential sperm-egg interactions in experimental pairings between two subspecies and their hybrids in a passerine bird |
| Q24539022 | Dynamic structure of the SPANX gene cluster mapped to the prostate cancer susceptibility locus HPCX at Xq27 |
| Q30445102 | Evolutionary diversification of SPANX-N sperm protein gene structure and expression |
| Q34322039 | Fecundity and MHC affects ejaculation tactics and paternity bias in sand lizards |
| Q51546417 | Females use multiple mating and genetically loaded sperm competition to target compatible genes |
| Q34931128 | Is sexual conflict an "engine of speciation"? |
| Q35230104 | Models of speciation: where are we now? |
| Q46275177 | Multiple hypotheses explain variation in extra-pair paternity at different levels in a single bird family. |
| Q36724491 | No postcopulatory response to inbreeding by male crickets |
| Q57899077 | Population Social Structure Facilitates Indirect Fitness Benefits from Extra-Pair Mating |
| Q28765410 | Sex-specific, counteracting responses to inbreeding in a bird |
| Q35164338 | Sexual conflict arising from extrapair matings in birds |
| Q24676760 | Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview |
| Q37244223 | Sigma virus and male reproductive success in Drosophila melanogaster |
| Q35821047 | Sperm competition in mammals |
| Q38043995 | Sperm wars and the evolution of male fertility |
| Q50524491 | Strategic promiscuity helps avoid inbreeding at multiple levels in a cooperative breeder where both sexes are philopatric |
| Q36853782 | The SPANX gene family of cancer/testis-specific antigens: rapid evolution and amplification in African great apes and hominids |
| Q37664182 | The contrasting role of male relatedness in different mechanisms of sexual selection in red junglefowl |
| Q35038251 | The dynamics of two- and three-way sexual conflicts over mating |
| Q51632838 | The effect of cryptic female choice on sex allocation in simultaneous hermaphrodites |
| Q52693572 | The need for sperm selection may explain why termite colonies have kings and queens, whereas those of ants, wasps and bees have only queens |
| Q46050214 | Understanding Homosexuality: Moving on from Patterns to Mechanisms |
Search more.