How choosy should I be? The relative searching time predicts evolution of choosiness under direct sexual selection.

scientific article published on 30 April 2014

How choosy should I be? The relative searching time predicts evolution of choosiness under direct sexual selection. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1098/RSPB.2014.0190
P932PMC publication ID4024288
P698PubMed publication ID24789896
P5875ResearchGate publication ID262019776

P50authorFrancois RoussetQ55175960
Alexandre CourtiolQ56480107
P2093author name stringBernard Godelle
Loïc Etienne
P2860cites workSexual selection and mate choiceQ22162496
Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traitsQ24634925
Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferencesQ28277015
Ecology, Sexual Selection, and the Evolution of Mating SystemsQ28294410
The Lande-Kirkpatrick mechanism is the null model of evolution by intersexual selection: implications for meaning, honesty, and design in intersexual signalsQ33633327
Natural and sexual selection on many lociQ33957453
Unexpected male choosiness for mates in a spiderQ59392485
SEXUAL SELECTION AND SEXUAL DIFFERENCES IN MORMON CRICKETS (ORTHOPTERA: TETTIGONIIDAE, ANABRUS SIMPLEX)Q88178663
MUTUAL MATE CHOICE AND SEX DIFFERENCES IN CHOOSINESSQ88201467
The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.Q34379150
Male fish deceive competitors about mating preferencesQ34803496
Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signallingQ35213147
The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferencesQ35995071
Quantitative genetic models of sexual selectionQ36479156
Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferencesQ36584480
Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios.Q37156779
Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin?Q37243342
Reproductive decisions under ecological constraints: it's about timeQ37243346
Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survivalQ38922380
Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.Q40896252
Make love not war: when should less competitive males choose low-quality but defendable females?Q45817800
PERSPECTIVE: CHASE-AWAY SEXUAL SELECTION: ANTAGONISTIC SEDUCTION VERSUS RESISTANCE.Q46201171
Strategic mating with common preferencesQ47249921
Testing the genetics underlying the co-evolution of mate choice and ornament in the wild.Q50773015
Male potential reproductive rate influences mate choice in a bushcricket.Q50880192
Unifying cornerstones of sexual selection: operational sex ratio, Bateman gradient and the scope for competitive investment.Q51552411
Male mating constraints affect mutual mate choice: prudent male courting and sperm-limited females.Q51684658
The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict.Q52066002
Honesty, perception and population divergence in sexually selected traits.Q52393181
Positive genetic correlation between female preference and offspring fitness.Q52600892
Why do males emerge before females? : A hypothesis to explain the incidence of protandry in butterflies.Q52818044
SUCCESSFUL FATHERS SIRE SUCCESSFUL SONS.Q52865945
THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES II. THE "HANDICAP" PRINCIPLE.Q53246092
Testing genetic models of mate choice evolution in the wild.Q53594912
Direct versus indirect sexual selection: genetic basis of colour, size and recruitment in a wild bird.Q53595035
GOOD GENES AND DIRECT SELECTION IN THE EVOLUTION OF MATING PREFERENCES.Q53713484
SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE CHOICE.Q54018405
Risky mate search and male self-sacrifice in redback spidersQ55954212
Perspective: Chase-Away Sexual Selection: Antagonistic Seduction Versus ResistanceQ56051077
Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trainsQ56156979
Sexual Selection: The Handicap Principle Does Work -- SometimesQ56227338
Predicting the direction of sexual selectionQ56432228
Mate Selection by Male Winter Moths Operophtera Brumata (Lepidoptera, Geometrldae): Adaptive Male Choice or Female Control?Q56804484
The Evolution of Infidelity in Socially Monogamous Passerines: The Strength of Direct and Indirect Selection on Extrapair Copulation Behavior in FemalesQ56854196
Good Parent and Good Genes Models of Handicap EvolutionQ57065516
Extraordinary Sex Roles in the Eurasian Dotterel: Female Mating Arenas, Female-Female Competition, and Female Mate ChoiceQ57159549
Sex differences, sex ratios and sex rolesQ57159555
Call Duration as an Indicator of Genetic Quality in Male Gray Tree FrogsQ57205434
Paternal genetic contribution to offspring condition predicted by size of male secondary sexual characterQ57237118
P433issue1785
P921main subjectsexual selectionQ206913
P304page(s)20140190
P577publication date2014-04-30
P1433published inProceedings of the Royal Society BQ2625424
P1476titleHow choosy should I be? The relative searching time predicts evolution of choosiness under direct sexual selection
P478volume281

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q36265179Can MHC-assortative partner choice promote offspring diversity? A new combination of MHC-dependent behaviours among sexes in a highly successful invasive mammal
Q50961948Evolutionarily stable mating decisions for sequentially searching females and the stability of reproductive isolation by assortative mating.
Q28817611MHC-dependent mate choice is linked to a trace-amine-associated receptor gene in a mammal
Q58573113Male mate choice in livebearing fishes: an overview
Q55429391Male size, not female preferences influence female reproductive success in a poeciliid fish (Poecilia latipinna): a combined behavioural/genetic approach.
Q27335578Mismatched partners that achieve postpairing behavioral similarity improve their reproductive success.
Q46328156Not all sex ratios are equal: the Fisher condition, parental care and sexual selection

Search more.