scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P50 | author | Francois Rousset | Q55175960 |
Alexandre Courtiol | Q56480107 | ||
P2093 | author name string | Bernard Godelle | |
Loïc Etienne | |||
P2860 | cites work | Sexual selection and mate choice | Q22162496 |
Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits | Q24634925 | ||
Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences | Q28277015 | ||
Ecology, Sexual Selection, and the Evolution of Mating Systems | Q28294410 | ||
The Lande-Kirkpatrick mechanism is the null model of evolution by intersexual selection: implications for meaning, honesty, and design in intersexual signals | Q33633327 | ||
Natural and sexual selection on many loci | Q33957453 | ||
Unexpected male choosiness for mates in a spider | Q59392485 | ||
SEXUAL SELECTION AND SEXUAL DIFFERENCES IN MORMON CRICKETS (ORTHOPTERA: TETTIGONIIDAE, ANABRUS SIMPLEX) | Q88178663 | ||
MUTUAL MATE CHOICE AND SEX DIFFERENCES IN CHOOSINESS | Q88201467 | ||
The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. | Q34379150 | ||
Male fish deceive competitors about mating preferences | Q34803496 | ||
Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling | Q35213147 | ||
The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences | Q35995071 | ||
Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection | Q36479156 | ||
Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences | Q36584480 | ||
Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. | Q37156779 | ||
Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin? | Q37243342 | ||
Reproductive decisions under ecological constraints: it's about time | Q37243346 | ||
Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival | Q38922380 | ||
Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. | Q40896252 | ||
Make love not war: when should less competitive males choose low-quality but defendable females? | Q45817800 | ||
PERSPECTIVE: CHASE-AWAY SEXUAL SELECTION: ANTAGONISTIC SEDUCTION VERSUS RESISTANCE. | Q46201171 | ||
Strategic mating with common preferences | Q47249921 | ||
Testing the genetics underlying the co-evolution of mate choice and ornament in the wild. | Q50773015 | ||
Male potential reproductive rate influences mate choice in a bushcricket. | Q50880192 | ||
Unifying cornerstones of sexual selection: operational sex ratio, Bateman gradient and the scope for competitive investment. | Q51552411 | ||
Male mating constraints affect mutual mate choice: prudent male courting and sperm-limited females. | Q51684658 | ||
The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. | Q52066002 | ||
Honesty, perception and population divergence in sexually selected traits. | Q52393181 | ||
Positive genetic correlation between female preference and offspring fitness. | Q52600892 | ||
Why do males emerge before females? : A hypothesis to explain the incidence of protandry in butterflies. | Q52818044 | ||
SUCCESSFUL FATHERS SIRE SUCCESSFUL SONS. | Q52865945 | ||
THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES II. THE "HANDICAP" PRINCIPLE. | Q53246092 | ||
Testing genetic models of mate choice evolution in the wild. | Q53594912 | ||
Direct versus indirect sexual selection: genetic basis of colour, size and recruitment in a wild bird. | Q53595035 | ||
GOOD GENES AND DIRECT SELECTION IN THE EVOLUTION OF MATING PREFERENCES. | Q53713484 | ||
SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE CHOICE. | Q54018405 | ||
Risky mate search and male self-sacrifice in redback spiders | Q55954212 | ||
Perspective: Chase-Away Sexual Selection: Antagonistic Seduction Versus Resistance | Q56051077 | ||
Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains | Q56156979 | ||
Sexual Selection: The Handicap Principle Does Work -- Sometimes | Q56227338 | ||
Predicting the direction of sexual selection | Q56432228 | ||
Mate Selection by Male Winter Moths Operophtera Brumata (Lepidoptera, Geometrldae): Adaptive Male Choice or Female Control? | Q56804484 | ||
The Evolution of Infidelity in Socially Monogamous Passerines: The Strength of Direct and Indirect Selection on Extrapair Copulation Behavior in Females | Q56854196 | ||
Good Parent and Good Genes Models of Handicap Evolution | Q57065516 | ||
Extraordinary Sex Roles in the Eurasian Dotterel: Female Mating Arenas, Female-Female Competition, and Female Mate Choice | Q57159549 | ||
Sex differences, sex ratios and sex roles | Q57159555 | ||
Call Duration as an Indicator of Genetic Quality in Male Gray Tree Frogs | Q57205434 | ||
Paternal genetic contribution to offspring condition predicted by size of male secondary sexual character | Q57237118 | ||
P433 | issue | 1785 | |
P921 | main subject | sexual selection | Q206913 |
P304 | page(s) | 20140190 | |
P577 | publication date | 2014-04-30 | |
P1433 | published in | Proceedings of the Royal Society B | Q2625424 |
P1476 | title | How choosy should I be? The relative searching time predicts evolution of choosiness under direct sexual selection | |
P478 | volume | 281 |
Q36265179 | Can MHC-assortative partner choice promote offspring diversity? A new combination of MHC-dependent behaviours among sexes in a highly successful invasive mammal |
Q50961948 | Evolutionarily stable mating decisions for sequentially searching females and the stability of reproductive isolation by assortative mating. |
Q28817611 | MHC-dependent mate choice is linked to a trace-amine-associated receptor gene in a mammal |
Q58573113 | Male mate choice in livebearing fishes: an overview |
Q55429391 | Male size, not female preferences influence female reproductive success in a poeciliid fish (Poecilia latipinna): a combined behavioural/genetic approach. |
Q27335578 | Mismatched partners that achieve postpairing behavioral similarity improve their reproductive success. |
Q46328156 | Not all sex ratios are equal: the Fisher condition, parental care and sexual selection |
Search more.