European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography.

scientific article published in February 2007

European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1007/S00330-006-0407-Y
P698PubMed publication ID16967260

P50authorStuart A TaylorQ55482817
Andrea LaghiQ38549464
P2093author name stringSteve Halligan
Jaap Stoker
Philippe Lefere
P2860cites workPRO: Patients with polyps smaller than 1 cm on computed tomographic colonography should be offered colonoscopy and polypectomy.Q53572116
Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison.Q53597286
CT colonography: progress toward colorectal evaluation without catharsis.Q53605255
Comparison of the relative sensitivity of CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema for screen detection of colorectal polyps.Q53626571
CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance.Q53631834
Three-dimensional endoluminal CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): comparison of three commercially available systems.Q53637907
Virtual colonoscopy using oral contrast compared with colonoscopy for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps.Q53645572
Colorectal Cancer Screening with CT Colonography, Colonoscopy, and Double-Contrast Barium Enema Examination: Prospective Assessment of Patient Perceptions and PreferencesQ53653309
Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography.Q53658149
A comparison of air, CO2 and an air/CO2 mixture as insufflation agents for double contrast barium enema*Q57624933
CT Colonography Reporting and Data System: A Consensus ProposalQ57944377
The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectumQ67352990
Use of air in double contrast barium enema--is it still acceptable?Q68005028
The use of air or CO2 as insufflation agents for double contrast barium enema (DCBE): Is there a qualitative difference?Q72014000
Patient acceptance for CT colonography: what is the real issue?Q74221814
CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positionsQ74578262
Computerized detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography on the basis of volumetric features: pilot studyQ77570119
Laxative-free CT colonographyQ80600575
Reader training in CT colonography: how much is enough?Q81260820
Computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colon diseases: a prospective, blinded studyQ30482172
Computer-assisted reader software versus expert reviewers for polyp detection on CT colonographyQ33234668
Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening populationQ35049261
Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy.Q36053311
Spasmolysis at CT colonography: butyl scopolamine versus glucagonQ36179072
Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displaysQ36238947
Intra-individual comparison of patient acceptability of multidetector-row CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema.Q40452272
CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility studyQ43619556
Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptanceQ44082747
Efficacy of IV Buscopan as a muscle relaxant in CT colonographyQ44564420
Optimizing colonic distention for multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of hyoscine butylbromide and rectal balloon catheterQ44566095
Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polypsQ45134564
CT colonography practice in the UK: a national surveyQ46854167
Supine/left decubitus scanning: a valuable alternative to supine/prone scanning in CT colonographyQ48014557
Automated insufflation of carbon dioxide for MDCT colonography: distension and patient experience compared with manual insufflation.Q51303919
Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography.Q51641043
Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.Q52957499
Polyp measurement using CT colonography: agreement with colonoscopy and effect of viewing conditions on interobserver and intraobserver agreement.Q53004265
Potentially serious adverse events at CT colonography in symptomatic patients: national survey of the United Kingdom.Q53544818
P433issue2
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)575-579
P577publication date2007-02-01
P1433published inEuropean RadiologyQ5413071
P1476titleEuropean Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography.
P478volume17