CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance.

scientific article

CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1007/S00330-004-2262-Z
P698PubMed publication ID14872280

P50authorStuart A TaylorQ55482817
Paul BassettQ43140096
Wendy AtkinQ43256547
P2093author name stringSteve Halligan
David Burling
Simon Morley
Clive I Bartram
P2860cites workObserver Variation in the Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia on Double-contrast Barium Enema: Implications for Colorectal Cancer Screening and TrainingQ57078723
A Comparison of Virtual and Conventional Colonoscopy for the Detection of Colorectal PolypsQ59790145
CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polypsQ77378305
An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colography (virtual colonoscopy)Q78172244
Error review: can this improve reporting performance?Q34390634
Diagnostic performance of virtual colonoscopyQ34782047
Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologistsQ34803438
Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy).Q35360536
How experience and training influence mammography expertiseQ39519552
Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patientsQ43619552
Just how valuable is double reporting in screening mammography?Q50182514
Standardized abnormal interpretation and cancer detection ratios to assess reading volume and reader performance in a breast screening program.Q50659712
Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection.Q51709081
Use of multidetector-row CT colonography for detection of colorectal neoplasia in patients referred via the Department of Health "2-Week-wait" initiative.Q52098571
Effect of investigator experience in CT colonography.Q52119164
CT colonography: multiobserver diagnostic performance.Q52945251
Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography.Q53658149
Subspecialist radiology.Q53663334
Detection of flat lesions in the colon with CT colonography.Q53673798
P433issue6
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)1025-1033
P577publication date2004-02-10
P1433published inEuropean RadiologyQ5413071
P1476titleCT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance.
P478volume14

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q8887780525th Anniversary of European Radiology
Q36660461A comparison of primary two- and three-dimensional methods to review CT colonography
Q36545130ACG colorectal cancer prevention action plan: update on CT-colonography
Q51986281Automated mass detection in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast and volume.
Q45994028CT Colonography to exclude colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients.
Q38932020CT colonography for population screening of colorectal cancer: hints from European trials
Q53002767CT colonography interpretation times: effect of reader experience, fatigue, and scan findings in a multi-centre setting.
Q53261385CT colonography training for radiographers — a formal evaluation
Q45258593CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy
Q46693501CT colonography with reduced bowel preparation after incomplete colonoscopy in the elderly.
Q36953294CT colonography: an update
Q53557041CT colonography: comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps.
Q50641074Colonoscopy for colonic wall thickening at computed tomography: a worthwhile pursuit?
Q85125286Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and interpretation times for a standard and an advanced 3D visualisation technique in CT colonography
Q37811249Computed Tomographic Colonography: Ready for Prime Time?
Q38064744Computed tomographic and magnetic resonance colonography: challenge for colonoscopy
Q35049261Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population
Q53032124Computer-aided detection for CT colonography: incremental benefit of observer training.
Q51872198Computer-aided detection in computed tomography colonography: current status and problems with detection of early colorectal cancer.
Q56547559Computer-based self-training for CT colonography with and without CAD
Q54567015Diagnostic accuracy of CT colonography for the detection of polyps in the diverticular disease.
Q53495585Effect of computer-aided detection as a second reader in multidetector-row CT colonography.
Q53520748European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography.
Q36143703Feasibility study of computed tomography colonography using limited bowel preparation at normal and low-dose levels study
Q43407526How should we train capsule endoscopy? A pilot study of performance changes during a structured capsule endoscopy training program
Q36167732Importance of extracolonic findings at IV contrast medium-enhanced CT colonography versus those at non-enhanced CT colonography
Q47340468Polyp measurement and size categorisation by CT colonography: effect of observer experience in a multi-centre setting
Q37250291Primary uncleansed 2D versus primary electronically cleansed 3D in limited bowel preparation CT-colonography. Is there a difference for novices and experienced readers?
Q42648573Radiological error: analysis, standard setting, targeted instruction and teamworking
Q40324983Reader error during CT colonography: causes and implications for training
Q38733985Serrated Polyps at CT Colonography: Prevalence and Characteristics of the Serrated Polyp Spectrum
Q34658118The influence of interpreters' professional background and experience on the interpretation of multimodality imaging of pulmonary lesions using 18F-3'-deoxy-fluorothymidine and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT.
Q53597289Unbiased studies are needed before virtual colonoscopy can be dismissed.
Q53618502Virtual endoscopy of the nasopharynx in the evaluation of its normal anatomy and alterations due to lymphoid hyperplasia: preliminary report.

Search more.