How a deliberative approach includes women in the decisions of screening mammography: a citizens' jury feasibility study in Andalusia, Spain.

scientific article

How a deliberative approach includes women in the decisions of screening mammography: a citizens' jury feasibility study in Andalusia, Spain. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1136/BMJOPEN-2017-019852
P932PMC publication ID5942446
P698PubMed publication ID29730621

P50authorEncarnación Benítez RodríguezQ73028973
P2093author name stringSoledad Márquez-Calderón
José M Baena-Cañada
Petra Rosado-Varela
Alicia Quílez-Cutillas
Juan Manuel Rivera-Bautista
Violeta Luque-Ribelles
P2860cites workDecision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisionsQ24200969
What is lacking in current decision aids on cancer screening?Q26822925
Content of invitations for publicly funded screening mammographyQ30476933
Deliberative democracy and cancer screening consent: a randomised control trial of the effect of a community jury on men's knowledge about and intentions to participate in PSA screeningQ30612397
Breast cancer in European Union: an update of screening programmes as of March 2014 (review)Q34372180
Abolishing mammography screening programs? A view from the Swiss Medical Board.Q34415457
Public knowledge of benefits of breast and prostate cancer screening in EuropeQ34996761
US women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross sectional surveyQ37339831
The use of citizens' juries in health policy decision-making: a systematic reviewQ38198441
Patients' expectations of the benefits and harms of treatments, screening, and tests: a systematic reviewQ38296894
CJCheck Stage 1: development and testing of a checklist for reporting community juries - Delphi process and analysis of studies published in 1996-2015.Q38972622
Women's Awareness and Perceived Importance of the Harms and Benefits of Mammography Screening: Results From a 2016 National SurveyQ40143717
Breast-cancer screening--viewpoint of the IARC Working GroupQ41697220
Assessment of the effects of decision aids about breast cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysisQ42376812
'Should a mammographic screening programme carry the warning: screening can damage your health!'?Q43201696
Enhancing citizen engagement in cancer screening through deliberative democracyQ44928498
Women's perceptions of breast cancer screening. Spanish screening programme survey.Q47780013
To nudge or not to nudge: cancer screening programmes and the limits of libertarian paternalismQ48420106
Challenges of informed choice in organised screening.Q53132485
A Public Health Framework for Screening Mammography: Evidence-Based vs Politically Mandated Care.Q53208550
Mammography screening is harmful and should be abandoned.Q53349179
The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent reviewQ57131263
Informed consent for screening by community samplingQ73730287
Making policy decisions about population screening for breast cancer: the role of citizens' deliberationQ81430788
A value framework for cancer screening: advice for high-value care from the American College of PhysiciansQ87328533
[Problematising disinformation in breast cancer awareness campaigns]Q89208693
P433issue5
P921main subjectmammographyQ324634
feasibility studyQ755009
P304page(s)e019852
P577publication date2018-05-05
P1433published inBMJ OpenQ17003470
P1476titleHow a deliberative approach includes women in the decisions of screening mammography: a citizens' jury feasibility study in Andalusia, Spain.
P478volume8