Making policy decisions about population screening for breast cancer: the role of citizens' deliberation

scientific article published on 10 October 2007

Making policy decisions about population screening for breast cancer: the role of citizens' deliberation is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/J.HEALTHPOL.2007.08.007
P698PubMed publication ID17931738

P50authorPatricia PriestQ90190637
Rob McGeeQ61851056
Charlotte PaulQ87699034
P2093author name stringRachel Nicholls
P433issue3
P304page(s)314-320
P577publication date2007-10-10
P1433published inHealth PolicyQ15758180
P1476titleMaking policy decisions about population screening for breast cancer: the role of citizens' deliberation
P478volume85

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q30577573A Community Jury on PSA screening: what do well-informed men want the government to do about prostate cancer screening--a qualitative analysis
Q33786044Assessing the public's views in research ethics controversies: deliberative democracy and bioethics as natural allies
Q33838431Assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: a case study of public deliberation on the ethics of surrogate consent for research
Q38972622CJCheck Stage 1: development and testing of a checklist for reporting community juries - Delphi process and analysis of studies published in 1996-2015.
Q50326407Cystic fibrosis: to screen or not to screen? Involving a Citizens' jury in decisions on screening carrier
Q30612397Deliberative democracy and cancer screening consent: a randomised control trial of the effect of a community jury on men's knowledge about and intentions to participate in PSA screening
Q90436218Effect of Public Deliberation on Patient Attitudes Regarding Consent and Data Use in a Learning Health Care System for Oncology
Q50709977Eliciting youth and adult recommendations through citizens' juries to improve school based adolescent immunisation programs.
Q47642418Genuine participation in participant-centred research initiatives: the rhetoric and the potential reality.
Q40214278Harnessing the potential to quantify public preferences for healthcare priorities through citizens' juries
Q55310327How a deliberative approach includes women in the decisions of screening mammography: a citizens' jury feasibility study in Andalusia, Spain.
Q44060039How do we achieve informed choice for women considering breast screening?
Q30392755Including the public in pandemic planning: a deliberative approach
Q35889895Involving a Citizens' Jury in Decisions on Individual Screening for Prostate Cancer
Q37251838Modified Policy-Delphi study for exploring obesity prevention priorities
Q36219257Obtaining consumer perspectives using a citizens' jury: does the current country of origin labelling in Australia allow for informed food choices?
Q53158091Prioritizing government funding of adolescent vaccinations: recommendations from young people on a citizens' jury.
Q60045746Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in women aged 40-74 years who are not at increased risk for breast cancer
Q55362945Should women aged 70-74 be invited to participate in screening mammography? A report on two Australian community juries.
Q39741081The evidence base for breast cancer screening
Q89665690Using Democratic Deliberation to Engage Veterans in Complex Policy Making for the Veterans Health Administration
Q47645096Valuing Healthcare Improvement: Implicit Norms, Explicit Normativity, and Human Agency
Q30532790Women's views on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: a qualitative study