| Q56561235 | Adaptive geographical clines in the growth and defense of a native plant |
| Q56488094 | An assessment of potential responses of Melaleuca genus to global climate change |
| Q111160004 | Biogeographic variation in resistance of the invasive plant, Alliaria petiolata, to a powdery mildew fungus and effect of resistance on competitive dynamics |
| Q56567411 | Biological control of Melaleuca quinquenervia: an Everglades invader |
| Q111171196 | Breakdown of a geographic cline explains high performance of introduced populations of a weedy invader |
| Q56745683 | Comparison of the herbivore defense and competitive ability of ancestral and modern genotypes of an invasive plant, Lespedeza cuneata |
| Q56559104 | Decreased indirect defense in the invasive tree, Triadica sebifera |
| Q56533559 | Decreased resistance and increased tolerance to native herbivores of the invasive plantSapium sebiferum |
| Q56749707 | Does Superior Competitive Ability Explain Yellow Starthistle's (Centaurea solstitialis) Successful Invasion of Annual Grasslands in California? |
| Q62557117 | Does release from natural belowground enemies help explain the invasiveness of Lygodium microphyllum? A cross-continental comparison |
| Q34778646 | Evidence for shifts to faster growth strategies in the new ranges of invasive alien plants |
| Q111591530 | Evolution of growth but not structural or chemical defense in Verbascum thapsus (common mullein) following introduction to North America |
| Q37593567 | Evolution of plant defenses in nonindigenous environments |
| Q56435581 | Genetic differentiation and phenotypic plasticity in life-history traits between native and introduced populations of invasive maple trees |
| Q34240432 | Genetic variation and evolution of secondary compounds in native and introduced populations of the invasive plant Melaleuca quinquenervia |
| Q56764877 | Greater performance of introduced vs. native range populations of Microstegium vimineum across different light environments |
| Q56699716 | Improved Understanding of Weed Biological Control Safety and Impact with Chemical Ecology: A Review |
| Q110809122 | Increased reproductive capacity and physical defense but decreased tannin content in an invasive plant |
| Q56768355 | Invasibility or invasiveness? Effects of habitat, genotype, and their interaction on invasive Rhododendron ponticum populations |
| Q33921725 | Lower resistance and higher tolerance of invasive host plants: biocontrol agents reach high densities but exert weak control |
| Q36709209 | Meta-analysis reveals evolution in invasive plant species but little support for Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability (EICA). |
| Q40250079 | No difference in the competitive ability of introduced and native Trifolium provenances when grown with soil biota from their introduced and native ranges |
| Q56556777 | No evidence for evolutionarily decreased tolerance and increased fitness in invasive Chromolaena odorata: implications for invasiveness and biological control |
| Q56763850 | No evidence for increased performance of a specialist psyllid on invasive French broom |
| Q56425935 | No evolution of reduced resistance and compensation for psyllid herbivory by the invasive Genista monspessulana |
| Q56114505 | Potential for water salvage by removal of non-native woody vegetation from dryland river systems |
| Q56487876 | Progress toward understanding the ecological impacts of nonnative species |
| Q57609734 | The effect of host plant intraspecific genetic variation on the fitness of a monophagous biological control agent |
| Q110531552 | The green thorns of Ulex europaeus play both defensive and photosynthetic roles: consequences for predictions of the enemy release hypothesis |
| Q56949647 | Tree invasions: a comparative test of the dominant hypotheses and functional traits |