| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1111/J.1365-2435.2007.01286.X |
| P50 | author | Janne S. Kotiaho | Q51724060 |
| P2093 | author name string | M. PUURTINEN | |
| P2860 | cites work | Lekking in the black grouse— a test of male viability | Q56020649 |
| The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek | Q56020653 | ||
| Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains | Q56156979 | ||
| Sexual selection, Handicaps and true fintess | Q56227340 | ||
| Unifying and Testing Models of Sexual Selection | Q56656959 | ||
| Convergent song preferences between female field crickets and acoustically orienting parasitoid flies | Q56690161 | ||
| Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird | Q56836087 | ||
| The Evolution of Costly Mate Preferences I. Fisher and Biased Mutation | Q57065637 | ||
| Meta-analysis, can it ever fail? | Q57266151 | ||
| Towards a resolution of the lek paradox | Q57266153 | ||
| Female choice for male drumming in the wolf spiderHygrolycosa rubrofasciata | Q57266159 | ||
| Heritable variation in a plumage indicator of viability in male great tits Parus major | Q59088505 | ||
| Flashing males win mate success | Q59096812 | ||
| The sexual selection continuum | Q22065942 | ||
| Sexual selection and mate choice | Q22162496 | ||
| Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits | Q24634925 | ||
| The evolution of mate choice and mating biases | Q24669654 | ||
| The indirect benefits of mating with attractive males outweigh the direct costs | Q24804341 | ||
| Mate selection—A selection for a handicap | Q28214988 | ||
| Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences | Q28277015 | ||
| The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle) | Q28304186 | ||
| Costs of sexual traits: a mismatch between theoretical considerations and empirical evidence | Q34092376 | ||
| Reproductive social behavior: cooperative games to replace sexual selection | Q34495379 | ||
| Genetic consequences of mate choice: a quantitative genetic method for testing sexual selection theory | Q34677846 | ||
| Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. | Q36479169 | ||
| Theories of sexual selection | Q37828230 | ||
| Sexually selected traits and adult survival: a meta-analysis | Q39104599 | ||
| How do animals choose their mates? | Q46244214 | ||
| Testing the genetics underlying the co-evolution of mate choice and ornament in the wild. | Q50773015 | ||
| Sexual selection for a handicap: a critical analysis of Zahavi's model. | Q50890881 | ||
| Sexual selection and the handicap principle. | Q50890892 | ||
| Relationships fade with time: a meta-analysis of temporal trends in publication in ecology and evolution. | Q51200927 | ||
| A large cost of female mate sampling in pronghorn. | Q51819418 | ||
| Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes. | Q52048621 | ||
| THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES II. THE "HANDICAP" PRINCIPLE. | Q53246092 | ||
| SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE CHOICE. | Q54018405 | ||
| Fluctuating paradigm. | Q55374232 | ||
| The Lek Paradox and the Capture of Genetic Variance by Condition Dependent Traits | Q55895821 | ||
| P433 | issue | 4 | |
| P304 | page(s) | 638-644 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2007-08-01 | |
| P1433 | published in | Functional Ecology | Q3090883 |
| P1476 | title | Mate choice for indirect genetic benefits: scrutiny of the current paradigm | |
| P478 | volume | 21 |
| Q30402765 | Context matters: sexual signaling loss in digital organisms |
| Q91155426 | Divergent color signals from homologous unfeathered ornaments in two congeneric grouse |
| Q40101244 | Do male moor frogs (Rana arvalis) lek with kin? |
| Q39108953 | Do males pay for sex? Sex-specific selection coefficients suggest not. |
| Q54432702 | Evidence of female-promoted polyandry in Trinidadian guppies |
| Q53640363 | Evolution of male and female choice in polyandrous systems. |
| Q56961574 | Experimental Removal of Sexual Selection Reveals Adaptations to Polyandry in Both Sexes |
| Q51150499 | Females choose gentle, but not healthy or macho males in Campbell dwarf hamsters (Phodopus campbelli Thomas 1905). |
| Q28547989 | Fitness Benefits of Mate Choice for Compatibility in a Socially Monogamous Species |
| Q51453321 | Fixed and dilutable benefits: female choice for good genes or fertility. |
| Q34044861 | Immune-mediated change in the expression of a sexual trait predicts offspring survival in the wild |
| Q46823153 | Increased hatching success as a direct benefit of polyandry in birds |
| Q35080113 | Is sexual ornamentation an honest signal of male quality in the Chinese grouse (Tetrastes sewerzowi)? |
| Q37243342 | Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin? |
| Q39057668 | Mate choice opportunity leads to shorter offspring development time in a desert insect |
| Q46475643 | Meta-analysis suggests choosy females get sexy sons more than "good genes". |
| Q37152895 | Multiple paternity in reptiles: patterns and processes |
| Q50594303 | Parents' genetic dissimilarity and offspring sex in a polygynous mammal. |
| Q42687390 | Relative weighting of acoustic information during mating decisions in grasshoppers indicates signatures of sexual selection |
| Q51287205 | Reproductive dynamics shapes genomotype composition in an allopolyploid complex. |
| Q51464031 | Sexual selection and temporal phenotypic variation in a damselfly population. |
| Q37599086 | Social and coevolutionary feedbacks between mating and parental investment |
| Q36477835 | Social pairing of Seychelles warblers under reduced constraints: MHC, neutral heterozygosity, and age. |
| Q48372694 | The deleterious effects of high inbreeding on male Drosophila melanogaster attractiveness are observed under competitive but not under non-competitive conditions |
| Q36081187 | The limits of sexual conflict in the narrow sense: new insights from waterfowl biology |
Search more.