Whites for racial justice: How contact with Black Americans predicts support for collective action among White Americans

article by Hema Preya Selvanathan et al published 9 March 2017 in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

Whites for racial justice: How contact with Black Americans predicts support for collective action among White Americans is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1177/1368430217690908

P50authorFiona K. BarlowQ51779374
P2093author name stringPirathat Techakesari
Linda R. Tropp
Hema Preya Selvanathan
P2860cites workNegative Intergroup Contact Makes Group Memberships Salient: Explaining Why Intergroup Conflict EnduresQ30047610
Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomenaQ34232066
Establishing a causal chain: why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processesQ34481738
Anger is an approach-related affect: evidence and implications.Q37404817
Transforming "apathy into movement": the role of prosocial emotions in motivating action for social changeQ37597823
Affective mediators of intergroup contact: a three-wave longitudinal study in South AfricaQ39732397
Friend or ally: whether cross-group contact undermines collective action depends on what advantaged group members say (or don't say).Q44233141
White guilt and racial compensation: the benefits and limits of self-focusQ46088628
Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political actionQ46311588
Perspective and prejudice: antecedents and mediating mechanismsQ46594796
Acting in solidarity: Testing an extended dual pathway model of collective action by bystander group membersQ47587422
The irony of harmony: intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equalityQ47624677
The role of efficacy and moral outrage norms in creating the potential for international development activism through group-based interaction.Q47681150
Intergroup Contact and Social Change: Implications of Negative and Positive Contact for Collective Action in Advantaged and Disadvantaged Groups.Q47696907
Multiple emotions: a person-centered approach to the relationship between intergroup emotion and action orientationQ47886655
Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: the role of anger, shame, and guilt.Q48407124
Differential relationships between intergroup contact and affective and cognitive dimensions of prejudice.Q50962942
How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediatorsQ56112977
Generalized Intergroup Contact Effects on PrejudiceQ56335546
The Contact CaveatQ57258893
Negative intergroup contact is more influential, but positive intergroup contact is more common: Assessing contact prominence and contact prevalence in five Central European countriesQ57258896
Positive and extensive intergroup contact in the past buffers against the disproportionate impact of negative contact in the presentQ57258897
An Investigation of Positive and Negative Contact As Predictors of Intergroup Attitudes in the United States, Hong Kong, and ThailandQ57591923
Saving Bulgaria's Jews: an analysis of social identity and the mobilisation of social solidarityQ57916240
“Let Them Eat Harmony”Q59181343
P433issue6
P921main subjectcollective actionQ1471594
P304page(s)893-912
P577publication date2017-03-09
P1433published inGroup Processes & Intergroup RelationsQ15710068
P1476titleWhites for racial justice: How contact with Black Americans predicts support for collective action among White Americans
P478volume21

Reverse relations

Q47689737How negative contact and positive contact with Whites predict collective action among racial and ethnic minorities.cites workP2860