scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P356 | DOI | 10.1177/1368430217690908 |
P50 | author | Fiona K. Barlow | Q51779374 |
P2093 | author name string | Pirathat Techakesari | |
Linda R. Tropp | |||
Hema Preya Selvanathan | |||
P2860 | cites work | Negative Intergroup Contact Makes Group Memberships Salient: Explaining Why Intergroup Conflict Endures | Q30047610 |
Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena | Q34232066 | ||
Establishing a causal chain: why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes | Q34481738 | ||
Anger is an approach-related affect: evidence and implications. | Q37404817 | ||
Transforming "apathy into movement": the role of prosocial emotions in motivating action for social change | Q37597823 | ||
Affective mediators of intergroup contact: a three-wave longitudinal study in South Africa | Q39732397 | ||
Friend or ally: whether cross-group contact undermines collective action depends on what advantaged group members say (or don't say). | Q44233141 | ||
White guilt and racial compensation: the benefits and limits of self-focus | Q46088628 | ||
Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action | Q46311588 | ||
Perspective and prejudice: antecedents and mediating mechanisms | Q46594796 | ||
Acting in solidarity: Testing an extended dual pathway model of collective action by bystander group members | Q47587422 | ||
The irony of harmony: intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality | Q47624677 | ||
The role of efficacy and moral outrage norms in creating the potential for international development activism through group-based interaction. | Q47681150 | ||
Intergroup Contact and Social Change: Implications of Negative and Positive Contact for Collective Action in Advantaged and Disadvantaged Groups. | Q47696907 | ||
Multiple emotions: a person-centered approach to the relationship between intergroup emotion and action orientation | Q47886655 | ||
Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: the role of anger, shame, and guilt. | Q48407124 | ||
Differential relationships between intergroup contact and affective and cognitive dimensions of prejudice. | Q50962942 | ||
How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators | Q56112977 | ||
Generalized Intergroup Contact Effects on Prejudice | Q56335546 | ||
The Contact Caveat | Q57258893 | ||
Negative intergroup contact is more influential, but positive intergroup contact is more common: Assessing contact prominence and contact prevalence in five Central European countries | Q57258896 | ||
Positive and extensive intergroup contact in the past buffers against the disproportionate impact of negative contact in the present | Q57258897 | ||
An Investigation of Positive and Negative Contact As Predictors of Intergroup Attitudes in the United States, Hong Kong, and Thailand | Q57591923 | ||
Saving Bulgaria's Jews: an analysis of social identity and the mobilisation of social solidarity | Q57916240 | ||
“Let Them Eat Harmony” | Q59181343 | ||
P433 | issue | 6 | |
P921 | main subject | collective action | Q1471594 |
P304 | page(s) | 893-912 | |
P577 | publication date | 2017-03-09 | |
P1433 | published in | Group Processes & Intergroup Relations | Q15710068 |
P1476 | title | Whites for racial justice: How contact with Black Americans predicts support for collective action among White Americans | |
P478 | volume | 21 |
Q47689737 | How negative contact and positive contact with Whites predict collective action among racial and ethnic minorities. | cites work | P2860 |