Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: The influence of affect and trust

article by Michael Siegrist et al published September 2007 in Appetite

Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: The influence of affect and trust is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/J.APPET.2007.03.002
P698PubMed publication ID17442455

P50authorArnim WiekQ57401620
Michael SiegristQ61312859
P2093author name stringHans Kastenholz
Marie-Eve Cousin
P2860cites workRisk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationalityQ28255959
Risk as feelingsQ33943609
P433issue2
P1104number of pages8
P304page(s)459-466
P577publication date2007-09-01
P1433published inAppetiteQ13430275
P1476titlePublic acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: The influence of affect and trust
P478volume49

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q38231400A review of poly(lactic acid)-based materials for antimicrobial packaging
Q50606569Affective imagery and acceptance of replacing nuclear power plants.
Q57438148Altruism and skepticism in public attitudes toward food nanotechnologies
Q53411756Applications of nanotechnology in food packaging and food safety: barrier materials, antimicrobials and sensors.
Q57155707Avoiding empty rhetoric: engaging publics in debates about nanotechnologies
Q53051509Changes in the influence of affect and cognition over time on consumer attitude formation toward nanotechnology: A longitudinal survey study.
Q57826555Cognitive reappraisal and pro-environmental behavior: The role of global climate change perception
Q40540554Communication About Micropollutants in Drinking Water: Effects of the Presentation and Psychological Processes
Q37189801Confluence and Contours: Reflexive Management of Environmental Risk
Q36337397Consumer acceptance of and willingness to pay for food nanotechnology: a systematic review.
Q59293873Current Trends in Green Technologies in Food Production and Processing
Q45086530Disentangling the influence of value predispositions and risk/benefit perceptions on support for nanotechnology among the American public
Q35546009Effects of disciplinary cultures of researchers and research trainees on the acceptability of nanocarriers for drug delivery in different contexts of use: a mixed-methods study
Q35952635Ethics, Risk and Benefits Associated with Different Applications of Nanotechnology: a Comparison of Expert and Consumer Perceptions of Drivers of Societal Acceptance
Q52777154Exploring Consumer Acceptance of Entomophagy: A Survey and Experiment in Australia and the Netherlands.
Q30520416Factors influencing societal response of nanotechnology: an expert stakeholder analysis
Q44040104Fruit and vegetable consumption - the influence of aspects associated with trust in food and safety and quality of food
Q38070327Graphene oxide nanoribbons (GNO), reduced graphene nanoribbons (GNR), and multi-layers of oxidized graphene functionalized with ionic liquids (GO-IL) for assembly of miniaturized electrochemical devices.
Q57437481Heterogeneous Consumer Preferences for Nanotechnology and Genetic-modification Technology in Food Products
Q58168952How Technology Features Influence Public Response to New Agrifood Technologies
Q41974907How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: results of a longitudinal study before and after the Fukushima disaster
Q57425884Hungry for Information: Public Attitudes Toward Food Nanotechnology and Labeling
Q33648351Impact of Knowledge and Misconceptions on Benefit and Risk Perception of CCS
Q38863784International Implications of Labeling Foods Containing Engineered Nanomaterials
Q57437052Investigating factors influencing consumer willingness to buy GM food and nano-food
Q46744683Knowledge, attitudes and behavioral intentions of agricultural professionals toward genetically modified (GM) foods: a case study in Southwest Iran
Q46662628Labeling of nanotechnology consumer products can influence risk and benefit perceptions
Q58391121Nanotechnology for sustainability: what does nanotechnology offer to address complex sustainability problems?
Q58391159Nanotechnology for sustainability: what does nanotechnology offer to address complex sustainability problems?
Q38307043Nanotechnology in meat processing and packaging: potential applications - a review
Q39686838Nanotechnology risk perceptions and communication: emerging technologies, emerging challenges
Q36320447Not in My Backyard: CCS Sites and Public Perception of CCS.
Q38219176Novel trends to revolutionize preservation and packaging of fruits/fruit products: microbiological and nanotechnological perspectives
Q34333064Of risks and regulations: how leading U.S. nanoscientists form policy stances about nanotechnology
Q57345415Outlook and Challenges of Nanotechnologies for Food Packaging
Q35562442Perceptions of risk from nanotechnologies and trust in stakeholders: a cross sectional study of public, academic, government and business attitudes
Q57331356Polymeric Nanocomposites and Nanocoatings for Food Packaging: A Review
Q39025373Predicting Vaccination Intention and Benefit and Risk Perceptions: The Incorporation of Affect, Trust, and Television Influence in a Dual-Mode Model
Q30392795Risk, Benefit, and Moderators of the Affect Heuristic in a Widespread Unlawful Activity: Evidence from a Survey of Unlawful File-Sharing Behavior.
Q38313040Risk/Benefit Communication about Food-A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Q38937939The Role of Affect in Attitude Formation toward New Technologies: The Case of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection
Q92703939The Role of Trust in Explaining Food Choice: Combining Choice Experiment and Attribute Best-Worst Scaling
Q35201516The acceptability of nanocarriers for drug delivery in different contexts of use: perceptions of researchers and research trainees in the field of new technologies
Q82253613The communication challenges presented by nanofoods
Q47820930The impact of accident attention, ideology, and environmentalism on American attitudes toward nuclear energy
Q49057520The public understanding of nanotechnology in the food domain: the hidden role of views on science, technology, and nature
Q39993438Understanding Local Policy Elites' Perceptions on the Benefits and Risks Associated with High-Voltage Power Line Installations in the State of Arkansas
Q45393552Value predispositions as perceptual filters: Comparing of public attitudes toward nanotechnology in the United States and Singapore.
Q44211710Vulnerability and social justice as factors in emergent U.S. nanotechnology risk perceptions

Search more.