scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P356 | DOI | 10.1016/J.APPET.2007.03.002 |
P698 | PubMed publication ID | 17442455 |
P50 | author | Arnim Wiek | Q57401620 |
Michael Siegrist | Q61312859 | ||
P2093 | author name string | Hans Kastenholz | |
Marie-Eve Cousin | |||
P2860 | cites work | Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality | Q28255959 |
Risk as feelings | Q33943609 | ||
P433 | issue | 2 | |
P1104 | number of pages | 8 | |
P304 | page(s) | 459-466 | |
P577 | publication date | 2007-09-01 | |
P1433 | published in | Appetite | Q13430275 |
P1476 | title | Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: The influence of affect and trust | |
P478 | volume | 49 |
Q38231400 | A review of poly(lactic acid)-based materials for antimicrobial packaging |
Q50606569 | Affective imagery and acceptance of replacing nuclear power plants. |
Q57438148 | Altruism and skepticism in public attitudes toward food nanotechnologies |
Q53411756 | Applications of nanotechnology in food packaging and food safety: barrier materials, antimicrobials and sensors. |
Q57155707 | Avoiding empty rhetoric: engaging publics in debates about nanotechnologies |
Q53051509 | Changes in the influence of affect and cognition over time on consumer attitude formation toward nanotechnology: A longitudinal survey study. |
Q57826555 | Cognitive reappraisal and pro-environmental behavior: The role of global climate change perception |
Q40540554 | Communication About Micropollutants in Drinking Water: Effects of the Presentation and Psychological Processes |
Q37189801 | Confluence and Contours: Reflexive Management of Environmental Risk |
Q36337397 | Consumer acceptance of and willingness to pay for food nanotechnology: a systematic review. |
Q59293873 | Current Trends in Green Technologies in Food Production and Processing |
Q45086530 | Disentangling the influence of value predispositions and risk/benefit perceptions on support for nanotechnology among the American public |
Q35546009 | Effects of disciplinary cultures of researchers and research trainees on the acceptability of nanocarriers for drug delivery in different contexts of use: a mixed-methods study |
Q35952635 | Ethics, Risk and Benefits Associated with Different Applications of Nanotechnology: a Comparison of Expert and Consumer Perceptions of Drivers of Societal Acceptance |
Q52777154 | Exploring Consumer Acceptance of Entomophagy: A Survey and Experiment in Australia and the Netherlands. |
Q30520416 | Factors influencing societal response of nanotechnology: an expert stakeholder analysis |
Q44040104 | Fruit and vegetable consumption - the influence of aspects associated with trust in food and safety and quality of food |
Q38070327 | Graphene oxide nanoribbons (GNO), reduced graphene nanoribbons (GNR), and multi-layers of oxidized graphene functionalized with ionic liquids (GO-IL) for assembly of miniaturized electrochemical devices. |
Q57437481 | Heterogeneous Consumer Preferences for Nanotechnology and Genetic-modification Technology in Food Products |
Q58168952 | How Technology Features Influence Public Response to New Agrifood Technologies |
Q41974907 | How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: results of a longitudinal study before and after the Fukushima disaster |
Q57425884 | Hungry for Information: Public Attitudes Toward Food Nanotechnology and Labeling |
Q33648351 | Impact of Knowledge and Misconceptions on Benefit and Risk Perception of CCS |
Q38863784 | International Implications of Labeling Foods Containing Engineered Nanomaterials |
Q57437052 | Investigating factors influencing consumer willingness to buy GM food and nano-food |
Q46744683 | Knowledge, attitudes and behavioral intentions of agricultural professionals toward genetically modified (GM) foods: a case study in Southwest Iran |
Q46662628 | Labeling of nanotechnology consumer products can influence risk and benefit perceptions |
Q58391121 | Nanotechnology for sustainability: what does nanotechnology offer to address complex sustainability problems? |
Q58391159 | Nanotechnology for sustainability: what does nanotechnology offer to address complex sustainability problems? |
Q38307043 | Nanotechnology in meat processing and packaging: potential applications - a review |
Q39686838 | Nanotechnology risk perceptions and communication: emerging technologies, emerging challenges |
Q36320447 | Not in My Backyard: CCS Sites and Public Perception of CCS. |
Q38219176 | Novel trends to revolutionize preservation and packaging of fruits/fruit products: microbiological and nanotechnological perspectives |
Q34333064 | Of risks and regulations: how leading U.S. nanoscientists form policy stances about nanotechnology |
Q57345415 | Outlook and Challenges of Nanotechnologies for Food Packaging |
Q35562442 | Perceptions of risk from nanotechnologies and trust in stakeholders: a cross sectional study of public, academic, government and business attitudes |
Q57331356 | Polymeric Nanocomposites and Nanocoatings for Food Packaging: A Review |
Q39025373 | Predicting Vaccination Intention and Benefit and Risk Perceptions: The Incorporation of Affect, Trust, and Television Influence in a Dual-Mode Model |
Q30392795 | Risk, Benefit, and Moderators of the Affect Heuristic in a Widespread Unlawful Activity: Evidence from a Survey of Unlawful File-Sharing Behavior. |
Q38313040 | Risk/Benefit Communication about Food-A Systematic Review of the Literature. |
Q38937939 | The Role of Affect in Attitude Formation toward New Technologies: The Case of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection |
Q92703939 | The Role of Trust in Explaining Food Choice: Combining Choice Experiment and Attribute Best-Worst Scaling |
Q35201516 | The acceptability of nanocarriers for drug delivery in different contexts of use: perceptions of researchers and research trainees in the field of new technologies |
Q82253613 | The communication challenges presented by nanofoods |
Q47820930 | The impact of accident attention, ideology, and environmentalism on American attitudes toward nuclear energy |
Q49057520 | The public understanding of nanotechnology in the food domain: the hidden role of views on science, technology, and nature |
Q39993438 | Understanding Local Policy Elites' Perceptions on the Benefits and Risks Associated with High-Voltage Power Line Installations in the State of Arkansas |
Q45393552 | Value predispositions as perceptual filters: Comparing of public attitudes toward nanotechnology in the United States and Singapore. |
Q44211710 | Vulnerability and social justice as factors in emergent U.S. nanotechnology risk perceptions |
Search more.