Randomized controlled trials: Often flawed, mostly useless, clearly indispensable: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright

scientific article published on 21 April 2018

Randomized controlled trials: Often flawed, mostly useless, clearly indispensable: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2018.04.029
P698PubMed publication ID29776687

P50authorJohn IoannidisQ6251482
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectrandomized controlled trialQ1436668
P304page(s)53-56
P577publication date2018-04-21
P1433published inSocial Science and MedicineQ7550785
P1476titleRandomized controlled trials: Often flawed, mostly useless, clearly indispensable: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright
P478volume210

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q92345753Alternative causal inference methods in population health research: Evaluating tradeoffs and triangulating evidence
Q92759961Five good reasons to be disappointed with randomized trials
Q101241316Preserving equipoise and performing randomized trials for COVID-19 social distancing interventions
Q64075761Re-evaluation of Significance and the Implications of Placebo Effect in Antidepressant Therapy
Q88582103Reflections on Randomized Control Trials

Search more.