scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P2093 | author name string | Iljana Schubert | |
Judith I M de Groot | |||
Elisa Schweiger | |||
P2860 | cites work | Online Information Sharing About Risks: The Case of Organic Food. | Q51415652 |
Better negative than positive? Evidence of a bias for negative information about possible health dangers. | Q52931073 | ||
Changes in the influence of affect and cognition over time on consumer attitude formation toward nanotechnology: A longitudinal survey study. | Q53051509 | ||
Attitudes in the social context: the impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. | Q53877005 | ||
Communicating Low-Probability High-Consequence Risk, Uncertainty and Expert Confidence: Induced Seismicity of Deep Geothermal Energy and Shale Gas. | Q54083217 | ||
Perception of risk | Q56602912 | ||
Lightning Rods, Earthquakes, and Regional Identities: Towards a Multi-Scale Framework of Assessing Fracking Risk Perception | Q57093205 | ||
GM Foods and the Misperception of Risk Perception | Q57257864 | ||
Perception of hazards: the role of social trust and knowledge | Q73280033 | ||
Reconciling scientists' beliefs about radiation risks and social norms: explaining preferred radiation protection standards | Q80639557 | ||
Morality and nuclear energy: perceptions of risks and benefits, personal norms, and willingness to take action related to nuclear energy | Q84094938 | ||
Framing 'fracking': Exploring public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom | Q28584494 | ||
Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation | Q30883418 | ||
Personal values, beliefs, and ecological risk perception | Q31087502 | ||
Natural gas: Should fracking stop? | Q34020443 | ||
Social Norms and Global Environmental Challenges: The Complex Interaction of Behaviors, Values, and Policy | Q34059697 | ||
Values, perceived risks and benefits, and acceptability of nuclear energy | Q34285068 | ||
Social contagion of risk perceptions in environmental management networks | Q34508606 | ||
Social influence and the collective dynamics of opinion formation | Q35040913 | ||
Risk perception research: socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution | Q35761545 | ||
Consumers' Risk Perception of Household Cleaning and Washing Products | Q38869220 | ||
The future of nuclear power: value orientations and risk perception | Q40028713 | ||
The Strength of Weak Ties | Q41779230 | ||
Human and nature-caused hazards: the affect heuristic causes biased decisions | Q41963940 | ||
How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: results of a longitudinal study before and after the Fukushima disaster | Q41974907 | ||
Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging | Q44224298 | ||
Energy choices and risk beliefs: is it just global warming and fear of a nuclear power plant accident? | Q46541511 | ||
Social networks and HIV/AIDs risk perceptions | Q46969136 | ||
Influence of Risk Perception on Attitudes and Norms Regarding Electronic Cigarettes | Q47245488 | ||
Acceptance of new sanitation: The role of end-users' pro-environmental personal norms and risk and benefit perceptions | Q47299511 | ||
A social network contagion theory of risk perception | Q47932632 | ||
The Roles of Three Types of Knowledge and Perceived Uncertainty in Explaining Risk Perception, Acceptability, and Self-Protective Response-A Case Study on Endocrine Disrupting Surfactants | Q50117467 | ||
Affective imagery and acceptance of replacing nuclear power plants. | Q50606569 | ||
P921 | main subject | nuclear power | Q12739 |
P577 | publication date | 2020-02-13 | |
P1433 | published in | Risk Analysis | Q7336230 |
P1476 | title | Social Influence, Risk and Benefit Perceptions, and the Acceptability of Risky Energy Technologies: An Explanatory Model of Nuclear Power Versus Shale Gas |