Food industry sponsorship of academic research: investigating commercial bias in the research agenda

scientific article published on 30 August 2018

Food industry sponsorship of academic research: investigating commercial bias in the research agenda is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1017/S1368980018002100
P698PubMed publication ID30157979

P50authorLisa BeroQ16192607
P2093author name stringAlice Fabbri
Taylor J Holland
P2860cites workSugar industry influence on the scientific agenda of the National Institute of Dental Research's 1971 National Caries Program: a historical analysis of internal documentsQ21144587
Big food, food systems, and global healthQ21144608
Factors associated with findings of published trials of drug-drug comparisons: why some statins appear more efficacious than othersQ21563421
Constructing "sound science" and "good epidemiology": tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firmsQ24544116
Old ways, new means: tobacco industry funding of academic and private sector scientists since the Master Settlement AgreementQ24647726
Outcome reporting in industry-sponsored trials of gabapentin for off-label useQ28264491
Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusionsQ34066636
PLoS Medicine series on Big Food: the food industry is ripe for scrutinyQ34313739
The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrenceQ34373168
Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: an analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air ResearchQ34395036
Sugar Industry and Coronary Heart Disease Research: A Historical Analysis of Internal Industry DocumentsQ34540059
Conflicts of interest and critiques of the use of systematic reviews in policymaking: an analysis of opinion articlesQ34560163
Cocoa flavanol consumption improves cognitive function, blood pressure control, and metabolic profile in elderly subjects: the Cocoa, Cognition, and Aging (CoCoA) Study--a randomized controlled trialQ35120244
Scientific journals and conflict of interest disclosure: what progress has been made?Q35670547
The connection between academia and industryQ36013700
Quality of reviews on sugar-sweetened beverages and health outcomes: a systematic reviewQ37932299
Overstatement of results in the nutrition and obesity peer-reviewed literatureQ38153957
Association of Industry Sponsorship With Outcomes of Nutrition Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisQ38996088
Student loans and racial disparities in self-reported sleep duration: evidence from a nationally representative sample of US young adults.Q40646183
Findings from an online behavioural weight management programme provided with or without a fortified diet beverageQ44320060
Bias in reporting of end points of efficacy and toxicity in randomized, clinical trials for women with breast cancerQ44617042
Legislating “Sound Science”: The Role of the Tobacco IndustryQ45212689
Corporate Funding of Food and Nutrition Research: Science or Marketing?Q47903592
Coca-Cola - a model of transparency in research partnerships? A network analysis of Coca-Cola's research funding (2008-2016).Q55083840
P433issue18
P921main subjectresearch agendaQ121225075
academic researchQ62393045
P304page(s)3422-3430
P577publication date2018-08-30
P1433published inPublic Health NutritionQ15761419
P1476titleFood industry sponsorship of academic research: investigating commercial bias in the research agenda
P478volume21

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q92350816Adherence to dietary guidelines for the Spanish population and risk of overweight/obesity in the SUN cohort
Q99558735Declared funding and authorship by alcohol industry actors in the scientific literature: a bibliometric study
Q101058085Involvement of the food industry in nutrition conferences in Latin America and the Caribbean
Q59791694Methods for trustworthy nutritional recommendations NutriRECS (Nutritional Recommendations and accessible Evidence summaries Composed of Systematic reviews): a protocol
Q64939839The intersections of industry with the health research enterprise.

Search more.