Individual differences in visual attention: A short, reliable, open-source, and multilingual test of multiple object tracking in PsychoPy

scientific article published on 03 June 2020

Individual differences in visual attention: A short, reliable, open-source, and multilingual test of multiple object tracking in PsychoPy is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.3758/S13428-020-01413-4
P698PubMed publication ID32495028

P2093author name stringFrank Papenmeier
Hauke S Meyerhoff
P2860cites workPsychoPy--Psychophysics software in PythonQ24684122
Inhibition of returnQ28140156
Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic eventsQ28145639
A feature-integration theory of attentionQ28281952
Orienting of attentionQ28282162
To See or not to See: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in ScenesQ30054798
Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative reviewQ34021872
Tracking planets and moons: mechanisms of object tracking revealed with a new paradigmQ34114922
Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in visionQ34304767
What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness.Q34381527
Multiple object tracking in people with Williams syndrome and in normally developing childrenQ34464411
Delineating the neural signatures of tracking spatial position and working memory during attentive trackingQ35800510
Attentional costs in multiple-object trackingQ36727174
Neural measures of individual differences in selecting and tracking multiple moving objectsQ36943543
Studying visual attention using the multiple object tracking paradigm: A tutorial reviewQ39353592
Effects of target enhancement and distractor suppression on multiple object tracking capacityQ43275334
Splitting attention reduces temporal resolution from 7 Hz for tracking one object to <3 Hz when tracking threeQ43487009
Bottom-up and top-down attention are independent.Q45264887
How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanismQ46903745
The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences.Q48187941
Tracking multiple objects is limited only by object spacing, not by speed, time, or capacityQ48811406
The mathematics of multiple object tracking: from proportions correct to number of objects trackedQ48950297
The attentional field has a Mexican hat distributionQ49056394
Multiple object tracking and attentional processingQ49065770
Multielement visual tracking: attention and perceptual organizationQ49161539
The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two ThingsQ50368932
Object tracking: absence of long-range spatial interference supports resource theories.Q50611387
Exhausting attentional tracking resources with a single fast-moving object.Q50670247
Feature-based interference from unattended visual field during attentional tracking in younger and older adults.Q50688588
Attentional interference at small spatial separations.Q52177778
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactionsQ55882047
Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual searchQ55982827
Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displaysQ56095959
The Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology, or: The Disunity of Psychology as a Working HypothesisQ57564316
Natural-scene perception requires attentionQ84762380
Individual differences in long-term memoryQ90821301
P921main subjectopen-source softwareQ1130645
P577publication date2020-06-03
P1433published inBehavior Research MethodsQ15752712
P1476titleIndividual differences in visual attention: A short, reliable, open-source, and multilingual test of multiple object tracking in PsychoPy

Search more.