A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well-field history

scientific article published in 1946

A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well-field history is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1029/TR027I004P00526

P2093author name stringC. E. Jacob
H. H. Cooper
P2860cites workThe relation between the lowering of the Piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground-water storageQ107371276
P433issue4
P304page(s)526
P577publication date1946-01-01
P1433published inTransactions, American Geophysical UnionQ53953311
P1476titleA generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well-field history
P478volume27

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q58074500A field assessment of the value of steady shape hydraulic tomography for characterization of aquifer heterogeneities
Q47622002A single recovery type curve from Theis' exact solution
Q61736912An evaluation of Jacob's Method for the interpretation of pumping tests in heterogeneous formations
Q96963565Analysis of aquifer framework and hydraulic properties of Lovelock Valley, Lovelock, Nevada
Q51530914Applications of the Time‐Naught Term in the Cooper and Jacob (1946) Equation
Q83562657Assessment of Managed Aquifer Recharge Potential Using Ensembles of Local Models
Q35541092Causal factors for seismicity near Azle, Texas
Q95839892Causal mechanism of injection-induced earthquakes through the Mw 5.5 Pohang earthquake case study
Q44878659Determination of Storage Coefficients During Pumping and Recovery
Q46173826Drawdown Distribution in the Vicinity of Nonvertical Wells
Q46040546Ecological and genomic profiling of anaerobic methane-oxidizing archaea in a deep granitic environment.
Q44008004Estimating Hydraulic Parameters When Poroelastic Effects Are Significant
Q61736779Generalizing Agarwal's Method for the Interpretation of Recovery Tests Under Non-Ideal Conditions
Q61469885Hydraulic tests in highly permeable aquifers
Q61469618Hydrogeologic controls imposed by mechanical stratigraphy in layered rocks of the Châteauguay River Basin, a U.S.-Canada transborder aquifer
Q61737209Inferring spatial distribution of the radially integrated transmissivity from pumping tests in heterogeneous confined aquifers
Q61737223Influence of heterogeneity on the interpretation of pumping test data in leaky aquifers
Q44121060Interpretation of a Pumping Test with Interference from a Neighboring Well
Q59865325Measuring the effect of local water storage changes on in situ gravity observations: Case study of the Geodetic Observatory Wettzell, Germany
Q56387127Numerical evaluation of exponential integral: Theis well function approximation
Q51413569On the Utility of Calculating and Interpreting Apparent Storativity
Q57690639Pathogen and chemical transport in the karst limestone of the Biscayne aquifer: 1. Revised conceptualization of groundwater flow
Q107371079Permeable groundwater pathways and tritium migration patterns from the HANDLEY underground nuclear test, Pahute Mesa, Nevada
Q61736908Pumping tests in heterogeneous aquifers: An analytical study of what can be obtained from their interpretation using Jacob's Method
Q61737232Representative hydraulic conductivities in saturated groundwater flow
Q58074496Sensitivity and resolution of tomographic pumping tests in an alluvial aquifer
Q58074507Steady shape analysis of tomographic pumping tests for characterization of aquifer heterogeneities
Q61906632Traditional analysis of aquifer tests: Comparing apples to oranges?
Q59363417Two-dimensional characterization of hydraulic heterogeneity by multiple pumping tests
Q34135924Using Recovery Data to Extend the Effective Duration of Pumping Tests
Q30657903“An Assessment of the Huntley (2000) Baildown Test Data Analysis Method,”

Search more.