scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P50 | author | Melissa Haendel | Q28368079 |
Nicole Vasilevsky | Q42763131 | ||
P2093 | author name string | Matthew H Brush | |
Shreejoy J Tripathy | |||
Holly Paddock | |||
Gregory M Larocca | |||
Laura Ponting | |||
P2860 | cites work | Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research | Q22348097 |
ZFIN: enhancements and updates to the Zebrafish Model Organism Database | Q24614389 | ||
The costs of using unauthenticated, over-passaged cell lines: how much more data do we need? | Q27910526 | ||
Check your cultures! A list of cross-contaminated or misidentified cell lines | Q27910535 | ||
Toward interoperable bioscience data | Q28090939 | ||
ISA-TAB-Nano: a specification for sharing nanomaterial research data in spreadsheet-based format | Q28395696 | ||
Dealing with data: a case study on information and data management literacy | Q28729112 | ||
Research resources: curating the new eagle-i discovery system | Q28731217 | ||
Effective targeted gene 'knockdown' in zebrafish | Q29547445 | ||
Xenbase: gene expression and improved integration | Q30047279 | ||
Survey of the quality of experimental design, statistical analysis and reporting of research using animals | Q30941851 | ||
Genetic profiling reveals cross-contamination and misidentification of 6 adenoid cystic carcinoma cell lines: ACC2, ACC3, ACCM, ACCNS, ACCS and CAC2. | Q33474850 | ||
WormBase 2012: more genomes, more data, new website | Q34070082 | ||
PhenoMiner: quantitative phenotype curation at the rat genome database | Q34340506 | ||
Identifying targets of the Sox domain protein Dichaete in the Drosophila CNS via targeted expression of dominant negative proteins | Q34536871 | ||
A hybrid human and machine resource curation pipeline for the Neuroscience Information Framework | Q35840964 | ||
Open semantic annotation of scientific publications using DOMEO. | Q35914397 | ||
The mouse genome database: genotypes, phenotypes, and models of human disease | Q36491296 | ||
FlyBase: improvements to the bibliography | Q36491607 | ||
Quantifying the use of bioresources for promoting their sharing in scientific research | Q36847272 | ||
Regional and strain-specific gene expression mapping in the adult mouse brain | Q37271547 | ||
Electronic laboratory notebooks progress and challenges in implementation | Q38099619 | ||
Cell line cross-contamination: how aware are Mammalian cell culturists of the problem and how to monitor it? | Q40473671 | ||
Identification of essential genes in cultured mammalian cells using small interfering RNAs. | Q40756849 | ||
Retracted science and the retraction index | Q42931586 | ||
Retraction rates are on the rise | Q43050380 | ||
Intrastrain differences in seizure susceptibility, pharmacological response and basal neurochemistry of Wistar rats. | Q43260619 | ||
Apparent Hela cell contamination of human heteroploid cell lines | Q46945916 | ||
Involvement of early growth response-2 (Egr-2) in lipopolysaccharide-induced neuroinflammation | Q48216866 | ||
Defects of the fetal forebrain in mice with hereditary agenesis of the corpus callosum | Q48220949 | ||
Outbred Sprague-Dawley rats from two breeders exhibit different incidences of neuroanatomical abnormalities affecting the primary cerebellar fissure | Q48548635 | ||
Minimum information about a protein affinity reagent (MIAPAR) | Q56976161 | ||
P921 | main subject | reproducibility | Q1425625 |
P304 | page(s) | e148 | |
P577 | publication date | 2013-09-05 | |
P1433 | published in | PeerJ | Q2000010 |
P1476 | title | On the reproducibility of science: unique identification of research resources in the biomedical literature | |
P478 | volume | 1 |
Q81747275 | A Review on Blockchain Technology and Blockchain Projects Fostering Open Science |
Q41153277 | A computational modelling framework to quantify the effects of passaging cell lines. |
Q55031410 | A guideline for reporting experimental protocols in life sciences. |
Q45319895 | A snapshot of 3649 Web-based services published between 1994 and 2017 shows a decrease in availability after 2 years |
Q38370509 | Accelerating Biomedical Discoveries through Rigor and Transparency. |
Q24273255 | Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications |
Q21563519 | Addgene: making materials sharing "science as usual" |
Q30017586 | An Open Science Peer Review Oath |
Q91921020 | An evaluation of different Cripto-1 antibodies and their variable results |
Q38370537 | An evaluation of the status of living collections for plant, environmental, and microbial research |
Q24273259 | An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research |
Q24288821 | An open science peer review oath |
Q88580037 | Antibodies and methods for immunohistochemistry of extracellular matrix proteins |
Q39305217 | Antibody Validation in Bioimaging Applications Based on Endogenous Expression of Tagged Proteins |
Q112063296 | Antibody Watch: Text mining antibody specificity from the literature |
Q46815814 | Antibody anarchy: A call to order |
Q36051889 | Authentication: A Standard Problem or a Problem of Standards? |
Q52349779 | Baseline mRNA expression differs widely between common laboratory strains of zebrafish. |
Q52586099 | Biocuration: Distilling data into knowledge. |
Q38668893 | Biomedical text mining for research rigor and integrity: tasks, challenges, directions. |
Q24289019 | Brain-wide analysis of electrophysiological diversity yields novel categorization of mammalian neuron types |
Q28084530 | Bridging Translation by Improving Preclinical Study Design in AKI |
Q37403332 | Cell Biology. Fixing problems with cell lines |
Q63480002 | Challenges in Developing a Biochip for Intact Histamine Using Commercial Antibodies |
Q39401369 | Chemical Tools for Studying Lipid-Binding Class A G Protein-Coupled Receptors. |
Q91546464 | Complexity of Delivering Precision Medicine: Opportunities and Challenges |
Q48223263 | Counting Caenorhabditis elegans: Protocol Optimization and Applications for Population Growth and Toxicity Studies in Liquid Medium |
Q38383199 | Developing high-quality mouse monoclonal antibodies for neuroscience research - approaches, perspectives and opportunities |
Q26998575 | Disease insights through cross-species phenotype comparisons |
Q34962859 | Do corresponding authors take responsibility for their work? A covert survey |
Q50540641 | Editorial: Reporting guidelines for psychopharmacology |
Q42579603 | Editorial: Reproducibility in Research: A Cautionary Tale and Lessons Not Learned |
Q24288898 | Editorial: preclinical data reproducibility for R&D - the challenge for neuroscience |
Q49663011 | Enhancing Scientific Foundations to Ensure Reproducibility: A New Paradigm |
Q38378266 | Enhancing reproducibility: Failures from Reproducibility Initiatives underline core challenges |
Q90736546 | Fast Confirmation of Antibody Identity by MALDI-TOF MS Fingerprints |
Q28647341 | From Peer-Reviewed to Peer-Reproduced in Scholarly Publishing: The Complementary Roles of Data Models and Workflows in Bioinformatics |
Q30401051 | GeneWeaver: finding consilience in heterogeneous cross-species functional genomics data |
Q26771881 | Harnessing QbD, Programming Languages, and Automation for Reproducible Biology |
Q102203780 | Highly Versatile Cloud-Based Automation Solution for the Remote Design and Execution of Experiment Protocols during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
Q36489741 | How to avoid pitfalls in antibody use |
Q56976320 | I'll take that to go: Big data bags and minimal identifiers for exchange of large, complex datasets |
Q28658840 | ITK: enabling reproducible research and open science |
Q70934426 | Identification failure |
Q61453884 | Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing |
Q64083925 | Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing |
Q64083929 | Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing |
Q89243267 | In the name of reproducibility |
Q61443007 | Incidences of problematic cell lines are lower in papers that use RRIDs to identify cell lines |
Q47095951 | Indicators for the use of robotic labs in basic biomedical research: a literature analysis |
Q62673155 | Interactive Visualization for Large-Scale Multi-factorial Research Designs |
Q55061779 | Introducing the Affinity Binder Knockdown InitiativeA publicprivate partnership for validation of affinity reagents. |
Q38699688 | Irreproducibility in Preclinical Biomedical Research: Perceptions, Uncertainties, and Knowledge Gaps |
Q88752368 | Launch of an Infrastructure for Health Research: BBMRI-ERIC |
Q92843967 | Letter to the editor: A call for transparency in immunoassay techniques to enhance rigor and reproducibility |
Q24289508 | Managing risks in drug discovery: reproducibility of published findings |
Q35563659 | Mitogenome metadata: current trends and proposed standards |
Q47719218 | Modeling sources of inter-laboratory variability in electrophysiological properties of mammalian neurons |
Q91157099 | Mouse Phenome Database: a data repository and analysis suite for curated primary mouse phenotype data |
Q47162966 | Mouse Phenome Database: an integrative database and analysis suite for curated empirical phenotype data from laboratory mice |
Q24288979 | NIH Peer Review: Scored Review Criteria and Overall Impact |
Q36102424 | Navigating the Phenotype Frontier: The Monarch Initiative |
Q57294993 | Navigating the phenotype frontier: The Monarch Initiative |
Q88328407 | Never Waste a Good Crisis: Confronting Reproducibility in Translational Research |
Q37384418 | Non-clinical studies required for new drug development - Part I: early in silico and in vitro studies, new target discovery and validation, proof of principles and robustness of animal studies |
Q28655772 | OMICtools: an informative directory for multi-omic data analysis |
Q64085082 | On the Necessity of Validating Antibodies in the Immunohistochemistry Literature |
Q59765231 | Only Human: Scientists, Systems, and Suspect Statistics |
Q57459998 | Oxygenation in cell culture: Critical parameters for reproducibility are routinely not reported |
Q29616124 | Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility |
Q88193980 | Pragmatic statistical issues in biological research: Introduction to special series |
Q86523501 | Preclinical data reproducibility for R&D--the challenge for neuroscience |
Q42328113 | Propelling the paradigm shift from reductionism to systems nutrition |
Q58763186 | Protocols.io: Reducing the knowledge that perishes because we do not publish it |
Q27826378 | Public Data Archiving in Ecology and Evolution: How Well Are We Doing? |
Q26751289 | Quality Issues of Research Antibodies |
Q42346464 | Quality assurance and best research practices for non-regulated veterinary clinical studies. |
Q90463275 | Quantity and Reporting Quality of Kidney Research |
Q38392866 | RRIDs: A Simple Step toward Improving Reproducibility through Rigor and Transparency of Experimental Methods |
Q89174583 | Reagent Validation to Facilitate Experimental Reproducibility |
Q63363356 | Reforms in Academic Publishing: Should Behavioral Disorders and Special Education Journals Embrace Them? |
Q88615239 | Replications Everywhere: Why the replication crisis might be less severe than it seems at first |
Q42837023 | Reporting of results from animal studies |
Q26765395 | Reporting transparency: making the ethical mandate explicit |
Q31032633 | Reproducibility and conflicts in immune epitope data |
Q52969782 | Reproducibility: Standardize antibodies used in research. |
Q27910523 | Reproducibility: changing the policies and culture of cell line authentication |
Q30491562 | Reproducible and reusable research: are journal data sharing policies meeting the mark? |
Q43070094 | Research antibodies: do not use them to stain your reputation |
Q66677998 | Research data management at Elsevier: Supporting networks of data and workflows |
Q74440995 | Researchers argue for standard format to cite lab resources |
Q58034053 | STRENDA DB: enabling the validation and sharing of enzyme kinetics data |
Q90983210 | Semi-automated generation of pictures for the Mouse Grimace Scale: A multi-laboratory analysis (Part 2) |
Q106498418 | Sharing biological data: why, when, and how |
Q33576182 | Sources of error in the retracted scientific literature |
Q28602480 | Sustainable funding for biocuration: The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) as a case study of a subscription-based funding model |
Q27967892 | Target discovery from protein databases: challenges for curation |
Q50234072 | Ten Basic Rules of Antibody Validation |
Q98198003 | The Antibody Society's antibody validation webinar series |
Q57983323 | The CEDAR Workbench: An Ontology-Assisted Environment for Authoring Metadata that Describe Scientific Experiments |
Q28548038 | The Economics of Reproducibility in Preclinical Research |
Q26260861 | The Resource Identification Initiative: A Cultural Shift in Publishing |
Q35847548 | The Resource Identification Initiative: A Cultural Shift in Publishing |
Q28607382 | The Resource Identification Initiative: A cultural shift in publishing |
Q28604129 | The Resource Identification Initiative: a cultural shift in publishing |
Q102069963 | The Rigor and Transparency Index Quality Metric for Assessing Biological and Medical Science Methods |
Q87465203 | The antibody challenge |
Q30976796 | The center for expanded data annotation and retrieval |
Q96434860 | The effect of journal guidelines on the reporting of antibody validation |
Q97539797 | The effect of repeated passaging on the susceptibility of human proximal tubular HK-2 cells to toxic compounds |
Q57371725 | The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate |
Q41528654 | The explicit mentioning of reporting guidelines in urogynecology journals in 2013: A bibliometric study |
Q27943351 | The health care and life sciences community profile for dataset descriptions |
Q35553385 | The hemiptera (insecta) of Canada: constructing a reference library of DNA barcodes |
Q41451956 | The impact of preclinical irreproducibility on drug development |
Q30487147 | The increasing urgency for standards in basic biologic research |
Q50112393 | The need for a formalised system of Quality Control for environmental policy-science |
Q30488048 | The preclinical data forum network: A new ECNP initiative to improve data quality and robustness for (preclinical) neuroscience. |
Q39023051 | The reproducibility of biomedical research: Sleepers awake! |
Q42025855 | The trouble with apparent diffusion coefficient papers. |
Q46320906 | Toward standard practices for sharing computer code and programs in neuroscience. |
Q57455337 | Toward the Geoscience Paper of the Future: Best practices for documenting and sharing research from data to software to provenance |
Q110950202 | Towards FAIR protocols and workflows: the OpenPREDICT use case |
Q57264878 | Towards standard practices for sharing computer code and programs in neuroscience |
Q35985522 | Use of semantic workflows to enhance transparency and reproducibility in clinical omics |
Q104260530 | Use of the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (Tidier) Checklist in Social Work Research |
Q40463386 | Utility of checklist to describe experimental methods for investigating molecular biomarkers. |
Q64786929 | Validation of anti-glucocerebrosidase antibodies for western blot analysis on protein lysates of murine and human cells |
Q30487507 | Variations in Scientific Data Production: What Can We Learn from #Overlyhonestmethods? |
Q94500078 | What are innovations in peer review and editorial assessment for? |
Q52671014 | While it is not deliberate, much of today's biomedical research contains logical and technical flaws, showing a need for corrective action. |
Q47746054 | [Letter to the Editor] The need for improved education and training in research antibody usage and validation practices. |
Q91327837 | snapMRF: GPU-accelerated magnetic resonance fingerprinting dictionary generation and matching using extended phase graphs |
Search more.