| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P819 | ADS bibcode | 2015PLoSO..1027872K |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0127872 |
| P932 | PMC publication ID | 4463849 |
| P698 | PubMed publication ID | 26061881 |
| P5875 | ResearchGate publication ID | 278043580 |
| P2093 | author name string | Michał Krawczyk | |
| P2860 | cites work | "Positive" results increase down the Hierarchy of the Sciences | Q21136404 |
| How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data | Q21143770 | ||
| Editors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence? | Q24273213 | ||
| An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings | Q24273224 | ||
| False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant | Q24273231 | ||
| The life of p: "just significant" results are on the rise. | Q51143505 | ||
| P-curve: A key to the file-drawer | Q51186445 | ||
| A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values | Q51898263 | ||
| Beyond Publication Bias | Q56051090 | ||
| The Behavior of the P-Value When the Alternative Hypothesis is True | Q56337305 | ||
| Sorry everyone, but it didn't work (p = 0.06) | Q58257928 | ||
| Pressure to publish and fraud in science | Q70011023 | ||
| Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability | Q24273236 | ||
| Sifting the evidence-what's wrong with significance tests? | Q24524896 | ||
| Scientists behaving badly | Q28255365 | ||
| The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals | Q28923488 | ||
| The earth is round (p < .05). | Q29012835 | ||
| Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias | Q29619094 | ||
| Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 1: The P value fallacy | Q33866199 | ||
| Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling | Q34031507 | ||
| The p-value fallacy and how to avoid it | Q34274163 | ||
| Redefine misconduct as distorted reporting | Q34327687 | ||
| HARKing: hypothesizing after the results are known | Q34383905 | ||
| A Vast Graveyard of Undead Theories: Publication Bias and Psychological Science's Aversion to the Null | Q34484639 | ||
| Fostering integrity in research: definitions, current knowledge, and future directions | Q40348027 | ||
| A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05. | Q43447558 | ||
| An unexpected influence of widely used significance thresholds on the distribution of reported P-values | Q44951222 | ||
| P275 | copyright license | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International | Q20007257 |
| P6216 | copyright status | copyrighted | Q50423863 |
| P433 | issue | 6 | |
| P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
| P921 | main subject | p-value | Q253255 |
| P304 | page(s) | e0127872 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2015-06-10 | |
| P1433 | published in | PLOS One | Q564954 |
| P1476 | title | The Search for Significance: A Few Peculiarities in the Distribution of P Values in Experimental Psychology Literature | |
| P478 | volume | 10 |
| Q24288636 | Conservative Tests under Satisficing Models of Publication Bias |
| Q28604318 | Distributions of p-values smaller than .05 in psychology: what is going on? |
| Q48094320 | Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure |
| Q64052497 | Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis |
| Q28922888 | Reanalyzing Head et al. (2015): investigating the robustness of widespread p-hacking |
| Q42370783 | Why prudence is needed when interpreting articles reporting clinical trial results in mental health |
Search more.