Socio-psychological determinants of public acceptance of technologies: A review.

scientific article published on March 2011

Socio-psychological determinants of public acceptance of technologies: A review. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1177/0963662510392485
P932PMC publication ID3546631
P698PubMed publication ID23832558
P5875ResearchGate publication ID247157264

P50authorArnout R H FischerQ48357701
Lynn FrewerQ57625030
P2093author name stringNidhi Gupta
P2860cites workProspect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under RiskQ29540774
Risk as feelingsQ33943609
Attitudes as an expression of knowledge and "political anchoring": the case of nuclear power in the United KingdomQ40070224
Perceived risks from radiation and nuclear testing near Semipalatinsk, Kazakhstan: a comparison between physicians, scientists, and the publicQ43879822
Belief in public efficacy, trust, and attitudes toward modern genetic scienceQ45872137
Technology and fear: is wonder the key?Q47739144
Communicating about the risks and benefits of genetically modified foods: the mediating role of trust.Q48569813
The "Silent Springs" of Rachel Carson: mass media and the origins of modern environmentalismQ48739135
Controversial medical and agri-food biotechnology: a cultivation analysisQ51796884
Information technology risks as seen by the public.Q52280125
The social shaping of technologyQ55954617
The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each OtherQ56602441
GM Foods and the Misperception of Risk PerceptionQ57257864
How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefitsQ57697547
Exploring the Structure of Attitudes Toward Genetically Modified FoodQ58254072
Nanotechnology and the need for risk governanceQ58311959
Risk Communication – Consumers Between Information and Irritation1Q58311970
Laypeople's and Experts' Perception of Nanotechnology HazardsQ58391233
A Psychological Study of the Inverse Relationship Between Perceived Risk and Perceived BenefitQ64118034
Perceived risk, trust, and the politics of nuclear wasteQ81028831
Cloning sensations: mass mediated articulation of social responses to controversial biotechnologyQ81282739
P433issue7
P304page(s)782-795
P577publication date2011-03-01
P1433published inPublic Understanding of ScienceQ7257650
P1476titleSocio-psychological determinants of public acceptance of technologies: A review
P478volume21

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q47299511Acceptance of new sanitation: The role of end-users' pro-environmental personal norms and risk and benefit perceptions
Q53051509Changes in the influence of affect and cognition over time on consumer attitude formation toward nanotechnology: A longitudinal survey study.
Q36337397Consumer acceptance of and willingness to pay for food nanotechnology: a systematic review.
Q38259349Economic aspects of thermal treatment of solid waste in a sustainable WM system
Q35952635Ethics, Risk and Benefits Associated with Different Applications of Nanotechnology: a Comparison of Expert and Consumer Perceptions of Drivers of Societal Acceptance
Q57950254Extrapolating understanding of food risk perceptions to emerging food safety cases
Q30520416Factors influencing societal response of nanotechnology: an expert stakeholder analysis
Q90065239How the public imagines the energy future: Exploring and clustering non-experts' techno-economic expectations towards the future energy system
Q41684184Nanotechnology: An Untapped Resource for Food Packaging.
Q33747655North American Public Opinion Survey on the Acceptability of Crowdsourcing Basic Life Support for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest With the PulsePoint Mobile Phone App.
Q64243654Perceived Risk of Genetically Modified Foods Among Residents in Xi'an, China: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach
Q39934035Predictors of trust in the general science and climate science research of US federal agencies
Q58795555Protocol for the avatar acceptability study: a multiperspective cross-sectional study evaluating the acceptability of using patient-derived xenografts to guide personalised cancer care in Australia and New Zealand
Q36247202Reproductive modification in forest plantations: impacts on biodiversity and society
Q50122157Risk analysis and technology assessment in support of technology development: Putting responsible innovation in practice in a case study for nanotechnology.
Q50212079Social acceptability of phytoremediation: The role of risk and values
Q50895166Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the "Integrative Worldview Framework".
Q45393552Value predispositions as perceptual filters: Comparing of public attitudes toward nanotechnology in the United States and Singapore.

Search more.