| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1016/J.JPSYCHORES.2014.11.008 |
| P698 | PubMed publication ID | 25466321 |
| P50 | author | John Ioannidis | Q6251482 |
| P2860 | cites work | Who's Afraid of Peer Review? | Q15148669 |
| How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network | Q24260685 | ||
| Research grants: Conform and be funded | Q24495913 | ||
| The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor | Q29189750 | ||
| Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial | Q37809927 | ||
| Self-citations in six anaesthesia journals and their significance in determining the impact factor | Q51408866 | ||
| P433 | issue | 1 | |
| P921 | main subject | citation analysis | Q206276 |
| collaboration | Q1145523 | ||
| self-citation | Q22947386 | ||
| P304 | page(s) | 7-11 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2014-11-22 | |
| P1433 | published in | Journal of Psychosomatic Research | Q15709516 |
| P1476 | title | A generalized view of self-citation: direct, co-author, collaborative, and coercive induced self-citation | |
| P478 | volume | 78 |
| Q34504109 | Aberration of the Citation |
| Q47812171 | Academic criteria for appointment, promotion and rewards in medical research: where's the evidence? |
| Q38630073 | Author Self-Citation in the Otolaryngology Literature: A Pilot Study |
| Q64272578 | Authorship: From Credit to Accountability Reflections From the Editors´ Network |
| Q64881983 | Authorship: from credit to accountability : Reflections from the Editors' Network. |
| Q46051135 | Biases in obesity research: Identify, correct, endorse, or abandon effort? |
| Q60931019 | Critical Analysis of "X-Ray Imaging Is Essential for Contemporary Chiropractic and Manual Therapy Spinal Rehabilitation: Radiography Increases Benefits and Reduces Risks" by Oakley et al |
| Q89638184 | Does the h-index and self-citation affect external funding of orthopedic surgery research? An analysis of fellowship directors and their subspecialties |
| Q35992471 | From Excessive Journal Self-Cites to Citation Stacking: Analysis of Journal Self-Citation Kinetics in Search for Journals, Which Boost Their Scientometric Indicators |
| Q102318111 | How Many Neurosurgeons Does It Take to Author an Article and What Are The 'Other' Factors That Impact Citations? |
| Q38786387 | How do health behaviour interventions take account of social context? A literature trend and co-citation analysis. |
| Q36126349 | Identifying Anomalous Citations for Objective Evaluation of Scholarly Article Impact |
| Q24289253 | Increasing disparities between resource inputs and outcomes, as measured by certain health deliverables, in biomedical research |
| Q89481140 | JTB Editorial Malpractice: A Case Report |
| Q93112521 | Large-scale analysis of micro-level citation patterns reveals nuanced selection criteria |
| Q64097618 | Most UK scientists who publish extremely highly-cited papers do not secure funding from major public and charity funders: A descriptive analysis |
| Q64117445 | Reviewer-coerced citation: Case report, update on journal policy, and suggestions for future prevention |
| Q57903876 | Self-citation is the hallmark of productive authors, of any gender |
| Q26741971 | Statement on Publication Ethics for Editors and Publishers |
| Q51412048 | Temporal Trends (1999-2015) in the Impact Factor of Biomedical Journals Published by US and EU Scientific Societies |
| Q64097468 | The peer review process |
| Q38934708 | Top 50 most-cited articles on craniovertebral junction surgery |
| Q38738299 | Why do we think we know what we know? A metaknowledge analysis of the salt controversy |
Search more.