Academic criteria for appointment, promotion and rewards in medical research: where's the evidence?

scientific article published on 29 February 2016

Academic criteria for appointment, promotion and rewards in medical research: where's the evidence? is …
instance of (P31):
editorialQ871232
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1111/ECI.12612
P698PubMed publication ID26924551

P50authorJohn IoannidisQ6251482
David MoherQ28036061
P2093author name stringSteven N Goodman
P2860cites workHow to make more published research trueQ24288766
The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational studyQ28650039
Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metricsQ29649990
Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescenceQ34494429
Assessing value in biomedical research: the PQRST of appraisal and rewardQ36395292
Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical researchQ38177450
A generalized view of self-citation: direct, co-author, collaborative, and coercive induced self-citationQ38281484
Declaration of transparency for each research articleQ42544317
Publish or perish: a proposalQ52944442
P433issue5
P304page(s)383-385
P577publication date2016-02-29
P1433published inEuropean Journal of Clinical InvestigationQ15745208
P1476titleAcademic criteria for appointment, promotion and rewards in medical research: where's the evidence?
P478volume46

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q52622119Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure
Q55249125Collaboration in orthodontic clinical trials: prevalence and association with sample size and funding.
Q64112154How to design preclinical studies in nanomedicine and cell therapy to maximize the prospects of clinical translation
Q89402010Klasse statt Masse!
Q38952681Mass Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: An Exercise in Mega-silliness?
Q53412315Randomly auditing research labs could be an affordable way to improve research quality: A simulation study
Q27886969The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise
Q64067578The impact of caring for children on women's research output: A retrospective cohort study

Search more.